• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Dark Knight Rises: Offical Review Thread (Spoilers). $162MM Weekend

Page 15 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
back to tdkr...the orphanage is called st swithin's, and there are several mentions in tdkr. As they say in the movie, there are no coincidences...

There's some kind of inside joke or nod there. Kinda curious what it is. Its too obscure to be a coincidence. Also, i like the billy bragg song.

where is the triigger, where is it!
 
My GF's conclusion (since we never see the necklace on catwoman at the end) is that Bruce put the necklace in the batcave and then gave Robin (JGL) the GPS transmitter so he could find the batcave.

I refuse to believe that Bruce left it on Catwoman so that Alfred can find them, because that totally destroys the scene where Alfred tells Bruce that is his dream.

For me, it is clear that Alfred is surprised when he sees Bruce sitting there at the end, which is what makes the scene so powerful. Bruce said "Bye" to Alfred yet found it important enough to give Alfred some closure.

So, I saw it last night and I'm wondering what the whole point of introducing Robin was at the very end of the movie. Were they just paying homage to the Batman mythology, or do you think maybe they're considering another trilogy? I thought this was supposed to be the end of the movies but now that I think about it, they always were careful to say "end of the trilogy."

Oh, and I thought Anne Hathaway kicked total ass as Catwoman. I was skeptical when she was named to the role but she did a great job.
 
The TV menu describing what is on (at least on Fios) isn't even accurately reflecting what they are showing. I went through NBC, CNBC, MSNBC and a few others last night and DVR'ed what looked interesting. This morning, I see womens volleyball instead of field hockey, and men's gymnastics instead of women's weight lifting. Don't judge my choices, just sayin'!

Wrong thread? 🙂
 
So, I saw it last night and I'm wondering what the whole point of introducing Robin was at the very end of the movie. Were they just paying homage to the Batman mythology, or do you think maybe they're considering another trilogy? I thought this was supposed to be the end of the movies but now that I think about it, they always were careful to say "end of the trilogy."

Oh, and I thought Anne Hathaway kicked total ass as Catwoman. I was skeptical when she was named to the role but she did a great job.

The whole point is a muse, nothing more- for the audience to say "Ohh!! That's Robin who's gonna take up after the retired Batman!" I liked that little kick in the end. Nolan isn't making more Batman. I don't see other directors taking up Nolan's work (not their own), and turn it into Robin franchise.

Also I don't think Robin franchise will sell at all. Too weak of a 'brand'. It won't do well in US and no one will watch it outside of US.

I thought Hathaway's Catwoman was bad.... I just think Pfeffer did the perfect cat woman. Hathaway isn't slender enough.. also no claws and whip?
 
The whole point is a muse, nothing more- for the audience to say "Ohh!! That's Robin who's gonna take up after the retired Batman!" I liked that little kick in the end. Nolan isn't making more Batman. I don't see other directors taking up Nolan's work (not their own), and turn it into Robin franchise.

Also I don't think Robin franchise will sell at all. Too weak of a 'brand'. It won't do well in US and no one will watch it outside of US.

I thought Hathaway's Catwoman was bad.... I just think Pfeffer did the perfect cat woman. Hathaway isn't slender enough.. also no claws and whip?

If she was any more slender, she'd be dead.
 
I could see a Nightwing spin-off if they dropped the whole "Robin" thing.

not as well-known of a character, but it's a cool concept and doesn't come burdened with the sidekick stigma.
 
The whole point is a muse, nothing more- for the audience to say "Ohh!! That's Robin who's gonna take up after the retired Batman!" I liked that little kick in the end. Nolan isn't making more Batman. I don't see other directors taking up Nolan's work (not their own), and turn it into Robin franchise.

Also I don't think Robin franchise will sell at all. Too weak of a 'brand'. It won't do well in US and no one will watch it outside of US.

I thought Hathaway's Catwoman was bad.... I just think Pfeffer did the perfect cat woman. Hathaway isn't slender enough.. also no claws and whip?

isn't slender enough?!?!?!? are you kidding me?!?!?!
 
I thought Hathaway's Catwoman was bad.... I just think Pfeffer did the perfect cat woman. Hathaway isn't slender enough.. also no claws and whip?

DKR-37268.jpeg


Looks fine to me. They should have done a full mask to cover head and hair, not just the face. Agreed on why they didn't include whip and claws. at least in one scene. :\
 
What I thought was odd about her Catwoman is that... she doesn't really feel like Catwoman. I think that's more of an issue with the script than her acting, because essentially... I don't think the script ever comes out and calls her Catwoman. There were numerous references to "cat" (in newspaper articles, etc.) and the fact that she has the same name as Catwoman (Selena Kyle).

I guess you could say that it's more of a re-imagining of Catwoman that doesn't really go along with everything that we're used to.
 
yeah, Catwoman definitely felt more like a new character who just used the same name as an old one.

she didn't really have that unhinged personality to morph her from cat burglar to Catwoman.
 
It was good, but nowhere near as good as TDK. I dont think the script was quite as good, but my biggest problem was with the villains.

Specifically, Talia being revealed as who she is, ruins Bane. During the whole movie, Bane had been built up to be this bad ass, who feels no pain, who escaped from the prison, etc etc. Then, right at the end, he is revealed to be Talia's bodyguard. And then Selina takes him out quicker than an anonymous cadet on a Star Trek episode vs the Borg.

And I think thats why I prefer TDK - the Joker. I liked Bane, although like some I couldnt hear him all of the time. He was pretty menacing. Its just that the ending made him far less menacing, because he went from a terrorist with a mission to a puppy dog bodyguard. The Joker, on the other hand, is as much a symbol as Batman is - he is pure chaos.

It did plod along in some places, too.
 
It was good, but nowhere near as good as TDK. I dont think the script was quite as good, but my biggest problem was with the villains.

Specifically, Talia being revealed as who she is, ruins Bane. During the whole movie, Bane had been built up to be this bad ass, who feels no pain, who escaped from the prison, etc etc. Then, right at the end, he is revealed to be Talia's bodyguard. And then Selina takes him out quicker than an anonymous cadet on a Star Trek episode vs the Borg.

And I think thats why I prefer TDK - the Joker. I liked Bane, although like some I couldnt hear him all of the time. He was pretty menacing. Its just that the ending made him far less menacing, because he went from a terrorist with a mission to a puppy dog bodyguard. The Joker, on the other hand, is as much a symbol as Batman is - he is pure chaos.

It did plod along in some places, too.
I think of it more like this - Until the point you find out who Bane really is you are meant to think he is a terrorist so he is made out to be one, after that point the villain mantel and terrorist focus is passed to Talia and so Bane just gets out of the way, thanks to Catwoman. It makes sense to me.

Also, not spoiler tagging it because if you're this deep in this thread you're fucked now.
 
I was hoping for the Catwoman goggles but can't have everything I suppose. All in all the movie was a good 9/10 for the great tension.
 
I found it funny that batman could get into gotham and set up his little bat signal on the bridge without anyone noticing...

It's a movie though, and a pretty good one. I give it 7 or 8 out of 10.
 
My GF's conclusion (since we never see the necklace on catwoman at the end) is that Bruce put the necklace in the batcave and then gave Robin (JGL) the GPS transmitter so he could find the batcave.

I refuse to believe that Bruce left it on Catwoman so that Alfred can find them, because that totally destroys the scene where Alfred tells Bruce that is his dream.

For me, it is clear that Alfred is surprised when he sees Bruce sitting there at the end, which is what makes the scene so powerful. Bruce said "Bye" to Alfred yet found it important enough to give Alfred some closure.

I think he gave him the GPS coordinates in that bag....
 
Catwoman was much better than I expected her to be.

Much better. I hadn't expected much.

The inclusion of catwoman and robin really is a sign IMO of Nolan just getting tired of the series, since a big part of batman begins was stripping out the "campy" parts of batman.

I felt that overall the performances weren't as intense as the first or second movie, something about the actors just seemed a little too relaxed. The writing isn't as poetic as the first two movies, it's just not as tight overall. It's more sprawling and grandiose.

Didn't like the batwing at all. It's clearly CGI, while the cool part of the batmobile was that it was a real operational car.

Also, hate to say this, but I suspect that the Aurora shooting will overall knock like $200 million off the value of this movie due to "stigma"

I myself already had tickets when Aurora happened, and I probably would have skipped it if I had the option.
 
Back
Top