Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Blazin Trav
I guess, but the woman with the kid looked like she almost died.
no ******.
the kid looked almost in the line of fire. WTF that was idiotic!
Camera angle. The bystanders were well outside of the line of fire.
that's HIGHLY debatable. I contend that they weren't as "well outside of the line of fire" as you claim.
No, its really not debatable.
Did she or her child get shot?
Nope, they sure didnt.
Did she or her child suffer powder burns?
Nope, they sure didnt.
Its a matter of persespective and skill. For .mil guys, they will ocasionally move downrange to change out their targets while their buddies continue to fire right next to them.
You could stand at 100 yards and hold a quarter between your fingers and I could put a hole in the quarter and never so much as scuff your fingers with my varminter.
You could stand within 4 feet of the target at 100 yards with my iron sights M4gery.
With a pistol at 10 yards a few feet.
Can you do that? Whats considered a safe distance to the line of fire is dependent upon the shooters abilities. In this case the shooter was well trained and obviously the woman was well outside his line of fire. If it was some ghetto gansta wanna be who holds his gun sideways and "throws" the gun while shooting the woman may very well have been in real danger.
Facebook
Twitter