• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The #1 reason Bush is not impeached

Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
...thought that party controlled every branch of government?
Did you read what I wrote?
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: ncircle
impeached for what exactly?
or are you just putting your asshat fantasies in writing for all to see?

He's trying to fit in with all the other liberals because he thinks it is the cool thing to do.

I'm not a Bush lapdog. I didn't even vote for him because I was kind of scared him for a number of reasons, but after 9-11 he has done exactly what I think should have been done. He's not perfect, but I feel better about our security. I don't think Gore would have done what Bush did, he boss set the tone. Gore seems more of the liberal appeaser than the warrior. Bush stepped up to the plate and responded to the terrorists and I'm glad he did.

 
We don't need Bush impeached, the White House as a whole needs an aenema.

Let Election '04 FINALLY be that aenema, if the American people don't take matters into their own hands beforehand, or unless other countries finally get smart, band together, and come over to take out the Bush Regime, just the same way as Bush tried to depose Saddam's administration.

Let Russia, NK & China band together to remove the Bush Regime!
 
Originally posted by: phillyTIM
We don't need Bush impeached, the White House as a whole needs an aenema.

Let Election '04 FINALLY be that aenema, if the American people don't take matters into their own hands beforehand, or unless other countries finally get smart, band together, and come over to take out the Bush Regime, just the same way as Bush tried to depose Saddam's administration.

Let Russia, NK & China band together to remove the Bush Regime!

rolleye.gif
consider seeking help.
 
Can you imagine how things would be like with President Cheney and A$$Croft or Rump$felt as VP?

It would be great, the sniveling, whining liberals deserve the very best.





consider seeking help.

There is no help for what afflicts him, just keep him away from sharp objects and his chinstrap tight.
 
or unless other countries finally get smart, band together, and come over to take out the Bush Regime, just the same way as Bush tried to depose Saddam's administration.

Let Russia, NK & China band together to remove the Bush Regime!

You consider North Korea's government a better option than Bush. What a completely ignorant f@cktard you are, even if you're kidding.
 
Let me see......very tough question.......hmmmmmm....maybe because he hasn't committed an impeachable offense? 😕
 
Originally posted by: glenn1
or unless other countries finally get smart, band together, and come over to take out the Bush Regime, just the same way as Bush tried to depose Saddam's administration.

Let Russia, NK & China band together to remove the Bush Regime!

You consider North Korea's government a better option than Bush. What a completely ignorant f@cktard you are, even if you're kidding.

He's not kidding. His hatred drives him. In another thread he said he hoped more soldiers would get killed, driving us out of Iraq which would make Bush look bad.

 
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: glenn1
or unless other countries finally get smart, band together, and come over to take out the Bush Regime, just the same way as Bush tried to depose Saddam's administration.

Let Russia, NK & China band together to remove the Bush Regime!

You consider North Korea's government a better option than Bush. What a completely ignorant f@cktard you are, even if you're kidding.

He's not kidding. His hatred drives him. In another thread he said he hoped more soldiers would get killed, driving us out of Iraq which would make Bush look bad.


C'mon Dave. I'm assuming this is the thread you're referring to. Although I don't agree with his sentiments he feels about the deaths of the Iraqis, I don't see where he said, or even suggested, what you claim he said in your reply in that thread. It's up to you if you choose to launch a vendetta against another member, but you really shouldn't resort to using dishonest tactics. I seem to remember you using the word LIAR a lot a while back.

If there is a different thread where he said what you claim he said, I'm unaware of it (which doesn't mean it doesn't exist). But I don't see it in the thread I linked to.

 
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: glenn1
or unless other countries finally get smart, band together, and come over to take out the Bush Regime, just the same way as Bush tried to depose Saddam's administration.

Let Russia, NK & China band together to remove the Bush Regime!

You consider North Korea's government a better option than Bush. What a completely ignorant f@cktard you are, even if you're kidding.

He's not kidding. His hatred drives him. In another thread he said he hoped more soldiers would get killed, driving us out of Iraq which would make Bush look bad.


C'mon Dave. I'm assuming this is the thread you're referring to. Although I don't agree with his sentiments he feels about the deaths of the Iraqis, I don't see where he said, or even suggested, what you claim he said in your reply in that thread. It's up to you if you choose to launch a vendetta against another member, but you really shouldn't resort to using dishonest tactics. I seem to remember you using the word LIAR a lot a while back.

If there is a different thread where he said what you claim he said, I'm unaware of it (which doesn't mean it doesn't exist). But I don't see it in the thread I linked to.


So you explain it to me Gaard. What exactly did his post mean if not what I said?

"Let their deaths fuel the anger already growing in Iraq, and allow them to become stronger to kick Bush's Regime out of there pretty directly."

Seems to be pretty clear to me.

 
I take it to mean that he hopes that the killing of the Iraqi policemen makes the Iraqis angry enough to kick out the USA.
 
Don't want to ruffle any feathers but, the House impeaches and the Senate holds the trial.

The House can't Willy nilly hold impeachment hearings based on what is in the public domain at this point in time. Full deference historically has been given the President while attempting to follow his oath of office. Hold hearings on possible lies and all but, in this case you'll need a motive. A motive that isn't "In the furtherance of his oath of office"
 
I take it to mean that he hopes that the killing of the Iraqi policemen makes the Iraqis angry enough to kick out the USA.

......and they'll (Iraqis) will accomplish this feat, how? With bad language?

I appears that drawing logical conclusions is beyond your grasp........either deficient altogether or that partisanship and hatred act as a temporary blockage.
 
I appears that drawing logical conclusions is beyond your grasp........either deficient altogether or that partisanship and hatred act as a temporary blockage.

Go fvck yourself Corn. Save the insults for those who share your penchant for mudslinging.
 
Originally posted by: Corn
I take it to mean that he hopes that the killing of the Iraqi policemen makes the Iraqis angry enough to kick out the USA.

......and they'll (Iraqis) will accomplish this feat, how? With bad language?

I appears that drawing logical conclusions is beyond your grasp........either deficient altogether or that partisanship and hatred act as a temporary blockage.


Maybe they'll get France and the U.N. to come and bail them out from under American oppression.
 
Back
Top