The #1 reason Bush is not impeached

glugglug

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2002
5,340
1
81
Can you imagine how things would be like with President Cheney and A$$Croft or Rump$felt as VP?
 

spaceman

Lifer
Dec 4, 2000
17,611
172
106
impeached for what exactly?
or are you just putting your asshat fantasies in writing for all to see?
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Impeachment can only be done by the Senate. And guess which party controls the Senate?
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
...thought that party controlled every branch of government?
Did you read what I wrote?
rolleye.gif
 

friedpie

Senior member
Oct 1, 2002
703
0
0
Originally posted by: ncircle
impeached for what exactly?
or are you just putting your asshat fantasies in writing for all to see?

He's trying to fit in with all the other liberals because he thinks it is the cool thing to do.

I'm not a Bush lapdog. I didn't even vote for him because I was kind of scared him for a number of reasons, but after 9-11 he has done exactly what I think should have been done. He's not perfect, but I feel better about our security. I don't think Gore would have done what Bush did, he boss set the tone. Gore seems more of the liberal appeaser than the warrior. Bush stepped up to the plate and responded to the terrorists and I'm glad he did.

 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
Originally posted by: her209
Impeachment can only be done by the Senate. And guess which party controls the Senate?

no party controls the senate, its a front, for me
 

phillyTIM

Golden Member
Jan 12, 2001
1,942
10
81
We don't need Bush impeached, the White House as a whole needs an aenema.

Let Election '04 FINALLY be that aenema, if the American people don't take matters into their own hands beforehand, or unless other countries finally get smart, band together, and come over to take out the Bush Regime, just the same way as Bush tried to depose Saddam's administration.

Let Russia, NK & China band together to remove the Bush Regime!
 

spaceman

Lifer
Dec 4, 2000
17,611
172
106
Originally posted by: phillyTIM
We don't need Bush impeached, the White House as a whole needs an aenema.

Let Election '04 FINALLY be that aenema, if the American people don't take matters into their own hands beforehand, or unless other countries finally get smart, band together, and come over to take out the Bush Regime, just the same way as Bush tried to depose Saddam's administration.

Let Russia, NK & China band together to remove the Bush Regime!

rolleye.gif
consider seeking help.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,344
5,910
126
Originally posted by: glugglug
Can you imagine how things would be like with President Cheney and A$$Croft or Rump$felt as VP?

Hehe, everyone else missed it, very good point.
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,389
29
91
Can you imagine how things would be like with President Cheney and A$$Croft or Rump$felt as VP?

It would be great, the sniveling, whining liberals deserve the very best.





consider seeking help.

There is no help for what afflicts him, just keep him away from sharp objects and his chinstrap tight.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
or unless other countries finally get smart, band together, and come over to take out the Bush Regime, just the same way as Bush tried to depose Saddam's administration.

Let Russia, NK & China band together to remove the Bush Regime!

You consider North Korea's government a better option than Bush. What a completely ignorant f@cktard you are, even if you're kidding.
 

Jmman

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 1999
5,302
0
76
Let me see......very tough question.......hmmmmmm....maybe because he hasn't committed an impeachable offense? :confused:
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: glenn1
or unless other countries finally get smart, band together, and come over to take out the Bush Regime, just the same way as Bush tried to depose Saddam's administration.

Let Russia, NK & China band together to remove the Bush Regime!

You consider North Korea's government a better option than Bush. What a completely ignorant f@cktard you are, even if you're kidding.

He's not kidding. His hatred drives him. In another thread he said he hoped more soldiers would get killed, driving us out of Iraq which would make Bush look bad.

 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: glenn1
or unless other countries finally get smart, band together, and come over to take out the Bush Regime, just the same way as Bush tried to depose Saddam's administration.

Let Russia, NK & China band together to remove the Bush Regime!

You consider North Korea's government a better option than Bush. What a completely ignorant f@cktard you are, even if you're kidding.

He's not kidding. His hatred drives him. In another thread he said he hoped more soldiers would get killed, driving us out of Iraq which would make Bush look bad.


C'mon Dave. I'm assuming this is the thread you're referring to. Although I don't agree with his sentiments he feels about the deaths of the Iraqis, I don't see where he said, or even suggested, what you claim he said in your reply in that thread. It's up to you if you choose to launch a vendetta against another member, but you really shouldn't resort to using dishonest tactics. I seem to remember you using the word LIAR a lot a while back.

If there is a different thread where he said what you claim he said, I'm unaware of it (which doesn't mean it doesn't exist). But I don't see it in the thread I linked to.

 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: glenn1
or unless other countries finally get smart, band together, and come over to take out the Bush Regime, just the same way as Bush tried to depose Saddam's administration.

Let Russia, NK & China band together to remove the Bush Regime!

You consider North Korea's government a better option than Bush. What a completely ignorant f@cktard you are, even if you're kidding.

He's not kidding. His hatred drives him. In another thread he said he hoped more soldiers would get killed, driving us out of Iraq which would make Bush look bad.


C'mon Dave. I'm assuming this is the thread you're referring to. Although I don't agree with his sentiments he feels about the deaths of the Iraqis, I don't see where he said, or even suggested, what you claim he said in your reply in that thread. It's up to you if you choose to launch a vendetta against another member, but you really shouldn't resort to using dishonest tactics. I seem to remember you using the word LIAR a lot a while back.

If there is a different thread where he said what you claim he said, I'm unaware of it (which doesn't mean it doesn't exist). But I don't see it in the thread I linked to.


So you explain it to me Gaard. What exactly did his post mean if not what I said?

"Let their deaths fuel the anger already growing in Iraq, and allow them to become stronger to kick Bush's Regime out of there pretty directly."

Seems to be pretty clear to me.

 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
I take it to mean that he hopes that the killing of the Iraqi policemen makes the Iraqis angry enough to kick out the USA.
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Don't want to ruffle any feathers but, the House impeaches and the Senate holds the trial.

The House can't Willy nilly hold impeachment hearings based on what is in the public domain at this point in time. Full deference historically has been given the President while attempting to follow his oath of office. Hold hearings on possible lies and all but, in this case you'll need a motive. A motive that isn't "In the furtherance of his oath of office"
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,389
29
91
I take it to mean that he hopes that the killing of the Iraqi policemen makes the Iraqis angry enough to kick out the USA.

......and they'll (Iraqis) will accomplish this feat, how? With bad language?

I appears that drawing logical conclusions is beyond your grasp........either deficient altogether or that partisanship and hatred act as a temporary blockage.
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
I appears that drawing logical conclusions is beyond your grasp........either deficient altogether or that partisanship and hatred act as a temporary blockage.

Go fvck yourself Corn. Save the insults for those who share your penchant for mudslinging.
 
Jan 12, 2003
3,498
0
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
I appears that drawing logical conclusions is beyond your grasp........either deficient altogether or that partisanship and hatred act as a temporary blockage.

[/b]Go fvck yourself Corn. Save the insults for those who share your penchant for mudslinging.


Ditto.




 
Jan 12, 2003
3,498
0
0
Originally posted by: Corn
I take it to mean that he hopes that the killing of the Iraqi policemen makes the Iraqis angry enough to kick out the USA.

......and they'll (Iraqis) will accomplish this feat, how? With bad language?

I appears that drawing logical conclusions is beyond your grasp........either deficient altogether or that partisanship and hatred act as a temporary blockage.


Maybe they'll get France and the U.N. to come and bail them out from under American oppression.