• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Texas to conduct a lawful audit of election

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
MrSquished said:
The problem with progressives and Democrats is they think they're talking to people that have some sense of ethics and morals. They don't. As is clearly evidenced here. Pieces of shit don't have any ethics or any morals. There is no discussion to be had with anybody that supports the attempts of the GQP to invalidate the Democratic process going forward. Need to stop wasting time talking to filth, then maybe the Dems will have the energy to fix this country.
Click to expand...
I treasure your input.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
Kind of like preventive maintenance for automobiles. Finding areas of potential problems and passing legislation to keep them from happening. Such as mailing out absentee ballots when none have been requested.
Click to expand...
When you change your oil you don just change 1qt. Doing that is pointless.

Audits are being done in the most populated districts where there are the most Dems, not the entire state. Again, if what you say is true (haha) that kind of audit is pointless.

But that's your point, right? It's pointless.
 
@imported_tajmahal loves soaking in his own filth with his lips securely fastened to his orange gods asshole! All these half truths, cherry picking and flat out conspiracy bullshit he spews on here daily is 100% factual and truthful evidence of my claim...unless he can produce evidence to the contrary...maybe a partisan "lawful" audit of his entire life is in order...and keep auditing until I am proven right!
 
VW MAN said:
@imported_tajmahal loves soaking in his own filth with his lips securely fastened to his orange gods asshole! All these half truths, cherry picking and flat out conspiracy bullshit he spews on here daily is 100% factual and truthful evidence of my claim...unless he can produce evidence to the contrary...maybe a partisan "lawful" audit of his entire life is in order...and keep auditing until I am proven right!
Click to expand...
Sounds like the standard Democratic ploy of continuing to count ballots until we count enough so we win. (Fla, 2000 and Minn, 2008) At least the Supreme Court finally stepped in in 2000 and stopped the fraud.
 
HomerJS said:
When you change your oil you don just change 1qt. Doing that is pointless.

Audits are being done in the most populated districts where there are the most Dems, not the entire state. Again, if what you say is true (haha) that kind of audit is pointless.
Click to expand...



Wouldn't it a kick if there was a full statewide audit by a genuinely independant professional auditor and they found all the fraud in (R) counties?
 
VW MAN said:
Which ones do and which ones dont? Be specific and use a non bullshit source to back your claim up.
Click to expand...
I didn't even think it was news. You can start with a NPR story.
www.npr.org

Are States Purging Or Cleaning Voter Registration Rolls?

Several states are removing voters from their rolls in preparation for the 2020 elections. Critics say voters are being unfairly "purged" but states say they're "cleaning up" the lists.
www.npr.org www.npr.org
 
@imported_tajmahal I am going to remind you this once again. Not everything you see on the internet is true. Just tell me an explanation to the two following questions, this way it is better to comprehend why you are saying what you are saying. It might just be a slight misconception that is causing you to get this much backlash and you are not realizing. I am willing to hear your explanation on this thread, I am willing to hear on this thread those explanations without proof to back them up as well, not saying I am going to believe them, just want you to open up fully on your point of view.

Why do you feel there was fraud in those counties in Texas?
Why do you feel that Democrats are responsible for the most voter fraud in 2020, and why do you belive news reports on them are true?
 
imported_tajmahal said:
Drawing up districts is not only legal, but a Constitutional part of governing, you just call it gerrymandering when Republicans do it, not Democrats.
Click to expand...
No, Gerrymanding is 100% illegal and has been ruled as unconstitutional. Drawing up districts which is called redistricting, not gerrymanding, is for changes in population and required every 10 years per the constitution to adjust for population changes. Gerrymanding is adjusting districts for political party favoritism, racial purposes, etc and nothing to do with redistricting based on population as the constitution intended. Gerrymanding is also used to suppress voting. Federal cases about Gerrymanding have been ruled unconstitutional via the SCOTUS. Yet it is still done. Have Democrats done it, yes, but not to the extent the Republican party has done to suppress voters and win elections. It's not ok for either party to do it. You know this, but as usual you are lying and manipulating shit.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
Why would i bother trying to "prove" anything to you? I honestly asked you what type a link/reference you wanted and got the typical ATP&N "get fucked". You seem more concerned with what "the source" is rather than the accuracy of the claim. So i'll ask you, what's more important, "the source" or the accuracy of the report?


One more thing, how about the "source" for "Russia,Russia,Russia"
Click to expand...
Are you really that goofy? The source has everything to do with the accuracy........what don`t you understand???
 
imported_tajmahal said:
Damn, and here in the United States i thought you actually had to be prosecuted and convicted before you're found guilty of crimes. Isn't there some kind of rule or law? Oh yeah


"Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense."
Click to expand...
you don`t know what your talkin g about..........or your a lying sack of ........you decide!
 
imported_tajmahal said:
I didn't even think it was news. You can start with a NPR story.
www.npr.org

Are States Purging Or Cleaning Voter Registration Rolls?

Several states are removing voters from their rolls in preparation for the 2020 elections. Critics say voters are being unfairly "purged" but states say they're "cleaning up" the lists.
www.npr.org www.npr.org
Click to expand...
Way to go dipshit you shared a source that didn't back your claim...again..

What's your next trick? Backflips while gobbling the orange cock?
 
Justinus said:
In your infinite genius, you have once again linked to a source that literally says the opposite of what you are claiming.
Click to expand...
You're a simpleton.

"States call this list maintenance, which, in fact, is something that they're required to do by federal law under certain restrictions.

If the state thinks that a voter has died or moved and is no longer eligible, they can be taken off the rolls, but only after they don't vote in the next two federal elections. But it's a really complicated process. And that's one reason that federal law requires that any of this list maintenance be done well before an election. And that's why we're seeing all this activity right now before the primary season begins."

Purging of the rolls is required by Federal law.
 
I'm currently playing Diablo II resurrected with my wife, the hyperbole here in ATP&N closely matches the hyperbole in that video game.

OOOhhhh the Prime evil once again stalks the land! Gotta love it.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
You're a simpleton.

"States call this list maintenance, which, in fact, is something that they're required to do by federal law under certain restrictions.

If the state thinks that a voter has died or moved and is no longer eligible, they can be taken off the rolls, but only after they don't vote in the next two federal elections. But it's a really complicated process. And that's one reason that federal law requires that any of this list maintenance be done well before an election. And that's why we're seeing all this activity right now before the primary season begins."

Purging of the rolls is required by Federal law.
Click to expand...

Yes and you made a claim that many states do not do it. Yet linked to a source that discusses many states.... doing it. So, where's the source that shows states are not doing it?
 
imported_tajmahal said:
I'm currently playing Diablo II resurrected with my wife, the hyperbole here in ATP&N closely matches the hyperbole in that video game.

OOOhhhh the Prime evil once again stalks the land! Gotta love it.
Click to expand...

You must be reviewing your own posting history then, right bitch-boy!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top