• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Texas to conduct a lawful audit of election

Page 13 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
510 incidences by 43 people.... How many of those 510 are all from the same election with the same ballot? What it comes down to is it's most likely 43 actual attempts of voter fraud with each attempt having multiple charges. The whole damn article is blowing smoke up your ass, with Paxton as the source.
One of the people arrested was a election official.


"The office of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced 134 felony charges were filed against Gregg County Commissioner Shannon Brown and three co-defendants in connection to an alleged vote harvesting scheme involving a Democratic primary in 2018. "
 
One of the people arrested was a election official.


"The office of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced 134 felony charges were filed against Gregg County Commissioner Shannon Brown and three co-defendants in connection to an alleged vote harvesting scheme involving a Democratic primary in 2018. "
Another article about 4 people involving 134 charges that have yet to be proven in court... I am not sure what you are trying to prove other than there is not wide spread election fraud.

Why are you not posting the shit about your boy Trump who has done far worse from trying to illegally overturn a legal and fair election to being the terrorist ring leader of the insurrection/terrist act of attacking Congress? Yet you are throwing out crap about .000025% election fraud in Texas. What you are trying to use to support the bullshit audit in Texas goes against your argument. Hell, your articles show that the elections and security measures already in place are working and catching suspected voter fraud, and it is not anything substantial, quite the opposite. All you are doing is showing just how stupid you and your position is.

Why are they not doing it in all the Republican counties if it was for legitimate reasons that actually had to do with catching voter fraud?
 
Last edited:
Import's boy Kenny .....







 
You do know that Trump won Texas in the election?
You do know the fraudit in TX is being done in 3 counties he lost and 1 that had more blue votes then expected right?

How does one such as you function on projection and stupidity in modern society? That's a serious question and we know your stupid broken brain wont provide an answer.
 
Another article about 4 people involving 134 charges that have yet to be proven in court... I am not sure what you are trying to prove other than there is not wide spread election fraud.

Why are you not posting the shit about your boy Trump who has done far worse from trying to illegally overturn a legal and fair election to being the terrorist ring leader of the insurrection/terrist act of attacking Congress? Yet you are throwing out crap about .000025% election fraud in Texas. What you are trying to use to support the bullshit audit in Texas goes against your argument. Hell, your articles show that the elections and security measures already in place are working and catching suspected voter fraud, and it is not anything substantial, quite the opposite. All you are doing is showing just how stupid you and your position is.

Why are they not doing it in all the Republican counties if it was for legitimate reasons that actually had to do with catching voter fraud?
Here's what we do know. How many of the Trump voter fraud claims were found to be true when everyone was put under oath in court?

wait for it....

ZERO
 
Yes, this article helps to explain why vote auditing is Texas is being done.

Sorry if i'm a bit late giving other examples to you

"Do you have a non biased source that does not contradict itself? "
Is there such a thing as a non biased source? Please list them.



Meh, I'll bite. Election fraud prosecutions since 2005 = 155. That's about 10 per year for a total of 534 votes out of millions.
534
Successfully prosecuted election fraud offenses against 155 individuals by the Office of the Attorney General since 2005.
510
The number of pending offenses against 43 defendants, currently pending prosecution.
386
The number of currently active election fraud investigations.



Only one of the pending cases is from the 2020 election.
In defending his controversial voting bill on CNN on Sunday, Texas state Sen. Bryan Hughes claimed half a dozen times that the attorney general's office had 400 open voter fraud cases.

“That's the fact,” Hughes, R-Mineola, said in an interview with CNN host Pamela Brown. “It's documented. There's no question about that.”

Yet that number is almost 10 times larger than the number of people with pending voter fraud charges in Texas, which is 43, according to data from the attorney general’s office. Only one of those pending cases stems from the 2020 election, in which more than 11 million Texans cast ballots.



Shitty record for voter fraud.
The Texas attorney general’s office spent nearly twice as much time working on voter fraud cases this year as it did in 2018 — logging more than 22,000 staff hours — yet resolved just 16 prosecutions, half as many as two years ago, records show.

All 16 cases involved Harris County residents who gave false addresses on their voter registration forms. None received any jail time.
In its 15 years of its existence, the unit has prosecuted a few dozen cases in which offenders received jail time, none of them involving widespread fraud.




What all this boils down to is that there always has been a very small degree of voter fraud in every election in every state since the US started having elections. There will always be a very small degree of voter fraud. All of these Republican audits is a waste of time and money and undercuts the legitimacy of US elections.
 
This is not about catching voter fraud, at least not in the way you think about it. These audits are an excuse for the GOP to get its hands one some very granular data that will help them redraw the district lines in those areas. This is not about the type of fraud people think it is, it is about they type that politicians have made legal, gerrymandering.
 
What you are saying is that we have an acceptable level of voter (+500 incidents) fraud in Texas and any effort by the Texas Attorney General to limit or find more or audit elections is not a good idea?
As I stated before, yes it is a good idea to audit election results, but only when it is worth auditing. The current situation does not show any need to conduct any audit.

You still have not answered my question. What did you mean when you said the word "limit" in your quoted post above?
 
The problem with progressives and Democrats is they think they're talking to people that have some sense of ethics and morals. They don't. As is clearly evidenced here. Pieces of shit don't have any ethics or any morals. There is no discussion to be had with anybody that supports the attempts of the GQP to invalidate the Democratic process going forward. Need to stop wasting time talking to filth, then maybe the Dems will have the energy to fix this country.
 
This is not about catching voter fraud, at least not in the way you think about it. These audits are an excuse for the GOP to get its hands one some very granular data that will help them redraw the district lines in those areas. This is not about the type of fraud people think it is, it is about they type that politicians have made legal, gerrymandering.
I haven't heard of that before. I guess with the aduit they can see how many votes came from each polling station.
 
Meh, I'll bite. Election fraud prosecutions since 2005 = 155. That's about 10 per year for a total of 534 votes out of millions.




Only one of the pending cases is from the 2020 election.




Shitty record for voter fraud.






What all this boils down to is that there always has been a very small degree of voter fraud in every election in every state since the US started having elections. There will always be a very small degree of voter fraud. All of these Republican audits is a waste of time and money and undercuts the legitimacy of US elections.
You state the obvious that there has always been voter fraud and that audits are a waste of time and money. I disagree. Audits are a necessary part of keeping vote fraud from becoming a greater problem.
 
This is not about catching voter fraud, at least not in the way you think about it. These audits are an excuse for the GOP to get its hands one some very granular data that will help them redraw the district lines in those areas. This is not about the type of fraud people think it is, it is about they type that politicians have made legal, gerrymandering.
Drawing up districts is not only legal, but a Constitutional part of governing, you just call it gerrymandering when Republicans do it, not Democrats.
 
As I stated before, yes it is a good idea to audit election results, but only when it is worth auditing. The current situation does not show any need to conduct any audit.

You still have not answered my question. What did you mean when you said the word "limit" in your quoted post above?
Kind of like preventive maintenance for automobiles. Finding areas of potential problems and passing legislation to keep them from happening. Such as mailing out absentee ballots when none have been requested.
 
Back
Top