Texas to conduct a lawful audit of election

Page 15 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Hail The Brain Slug

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2005
3,177
1,529
136
My personal experience where i was not replaced on California's rolls for 10 years after leaving the State.

Can you cite a non-anecdotal source that shows this is a widespread or common problem?

I'm not your step and fetch it or your gopher. Look it up yourself.

WOW you really like to make claims and then put the burden of proof on everyone else.

Here's how it works: You claimed states are not correctly following requirements to keep voter registration information up to date. You made this claim, now you have to cite a source.

Are you 13 years old?

Edit: as a sidenote, you just replied with two totally different viewpoints to the same post I made. Are you drinking, schizophrenic, or just dumb?
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,719
2,064
136
No, Gerrymanding is 100% illegal and has been ruled as unconstitutional. Drawing up districts which is called redistricting, not gerrymanding, is for changes in population and required every 10 years per the constitution to adjust for population changes. Gerrymanding is adjusting districts for political party favoritism, racial purposes, etc and nothing to do with redistricting based on population as the constitution intended. Gerrymanding is also used to suppress voting. Federal cases about Gerrymanding have been ruled unconstitutional via the SCOTUS. Yet it is still done. Have Democrats done it, yes, but not to the extent the Republican party has done to suppress voters and win elections. It's not ok for either party to do it. You know this, but as usual you are lying and manipulating shit.
Since "Gerrymandering is 100% illegal" we can all rest assured that the Districts in Texas have passed Judicial muster. You are just pissed that some political districting doesn't give Democrats a clear advantage.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pohemi

Pohemi

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2004
8,939
11,575
146
Are you a willful fucking moron?
Does a bear shit in the forest?
Well........ by dictionary definition... sort off. But history has proven otherwise, and the best example would be U.S.S.R. (United Soviet Socialist "Republics"). But then again, "Republic"ans claim they are not socialist. So the term Republic really has many meanings to it.
Stop trying to sound knowledgeable, please. You are failing miserably.
First you'll have to give me a list or publications or references you'd accept. Only left wing sources? mainstream media? corporate media ? Fox news ?
Distract, deflect...doesn't matter, as you won't give anything stating what you claim anyway, even if it's from a reasonable source.

Fling more shit, you fucking clown. You have nothing legitimate to offer. You are a waste of space and oxygen.
 

Amol S.

Platinum Member
Mar 14, 2015
2,390
709
136
Since "Gerrymandering is 100% illegal" we can all rest assured that the Districts in Texas have passed Judicial muster. You are just pissed that some political districting doesn't give Democrats a clear advantage.
Tell me, what are the chances of 4 federal house seats that cover a large area of Houston, was coincidentally and not intentional put in a manner to make a shape of a fetus in a pool of red?


How is making a single federal house seat like "Texas 35" that looks like a stretched piece of blob, when majority of house seats in Texas are nearly nice straight edged polygons, not called gerrymandering?
 

NWRMidnight

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2001
2,953
2,558
136
Since "Gerrymandering is 100% illegal" we can all rest assured that the Districts in Texas have passed Judicial muster. You are just pissed that some political districting doesn't give Democrats a clear advantage.
Did you even read my response past the first sentence? Your response indicates you didn't. You just keep cruising around on your idiot cycle without your helmet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54 and Pohemi

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
21,365
19,826
136
Did you even read my response past the first sentence? Your response indicates you didn't. You just keep cruising around on your idiot cycle without your helmet.
You are talking to a piece of fascist right wing shit that talks. They can't be anything but what they are. Shit.



04099fece74db668afa24216c1548958.jpg
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,084
27,830
136
Since "Gerrymandering is 100% illegal" we can all rest assured that the Districts in Texas have passed Judicial muster. You are just pissed that some political districting doesn't give Democrats a clear advantage.
Racist gerrymandering isn't legal. You people were found guilty in court doing that very thing in North Carolina. Even SCOTUS agreed

The racist party continues to uphold their reputation
North Carolina's Racial Gerrymandering Was Unconstitutional - The Atlantic
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,530
5,046
136
No, facts are facts, you are entitled to your own opinion, but NOT your own facts.

True, facts are facts. So where are any/all those facts that you’ve shared in this thread? I dare you to link them. And, of course, all we’ll get is static, white noise, and nonsense in response.

BTW…Opinion pieces are NOT facts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi and VW MAN
Feb 16, 2005
14,030
5,321
136
True, facts are facts. So where are any/all those facts that you’ve shared in this thread? I dare you to link them. And, of course, all we’ll get is static, white noise, and nonsense in response.

BTW…Opinion pieces are NOT facts.

They are when he agrees with them, or they're in line with his hate filled. toxic ideologies
 
  • Like
Reactions: ch33zw1z
Jul 9, 2009
10,719
2,064
136
Tell me, what are the chances of 4 federal house seats that cover a large area of Houston, was coincidentally and not intentional put in a manner to make a shape of a fetus in a pool of red?


How is making a single federal house seat like "Texas 35" that looks like a stretched piece of blob, when majority of house seats in Texas are nearly nice straight edged polygons, not called gerrymandering?
What house map are you looking at ? Certainly not Texas.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,719
2,064
136
True, facts are facts. So where are any/all those facts that you’ve shared in this thread? I dare you to link them. And, of course, all we’ll get is static, white noise, and nonsense in response.

BTW…Opinion pieces are NOT facts.
They may contain facts though, even if they are opinion pieces.

Contains many instances of actual prosecutions and convictions of vote fraud. Facts are facts, convictions are indisputable facts.

Another FACT.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pohemi

NWRMidnight

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2001
2,953
2,558
136
Not Texas.
Are you trying to say that SCOTUS rulings and the US Constitution don't apply to Texas and that they are not bound by such rulings and the Constitution? Because that is what your "Not Texas" answer implies. Are you really that stupid?? Never mind, I forgot, you ride thru life on your idiot cycle without your helmet, of course you are that stupid.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Pohemi

NWRMidnight

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2001
2,953
2,558
136
They may contain facts though, even if they are opinion pieces.

Contains many instances of actual prosecutions and convictions of vote fraud. Facts are facts, convictions are indisputable facts.

Another FACT.
What the fuck are you trying to prove? Nobody has said that there are zero instances of voter fraud. We have said there is absolutely no proof of wide spread voter fraud, and non that would change the outcome of any election. The number of instance of voter fraud is so small that it is basically non existent, which does not equal "many" as you imply when you actually look at it realistically and logically. (I know, something you are incapable of doing).

Per your heritage right wing bias web site: 1333 proven instances of voter fraud in recent elections across the United states.. Do you know how many votes and elections that covers when you calculate local, state and federal elections.? Just a unrealistic low estimate off the top of my head, probably 1/2 a billion to a billion ballots/votes and hundreds of elections counting all state, local, and federal elections with multiple local and state elections taking place per year. (That is not even calculating in any primaries or similar voting). But just for shits and grins, lets just use 1 single election to show just how fucking stupid you are, and the fact that your "many" instances are not "many" at all, but so fucking low, that there isn't a scale that goes that low, so it translates to non existence. We had about 155 Million votes cast in the 2020 federal presidential election.. lets just say all of those 1333 instance where from that single election, and not from the 100's of state and local election that have taken place recently. That is a .0000086% proven fraud rate using your own bias source.. Of course, the reality of it is that those 1333 proven instances of voter fraud are from all the 100's of recent elections across the United states, and not just the the 2020 Presidential election.. Which means that micro spec of fraud percent of .0000086% is actually even smaller. So small, that it wouldn't register sitting next to an atom.. you know, the smallest unit of ordinary matter that takes one of the most powerful microscopes to see.. yes, you are arguing about something that would take the most powerful microscope to even attempt to see, if we where talking about matter.

Basically, your whole argument of voter fraud, makes as much sense as sitting here arguing that 1333 grains of nutritious top soil in the Sahara Desert will turn the Sahara Desert into plush nutritious farm land.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi and pmv

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,615
29,269
146
The entire premise of ALL these audits is the big lie where Trump and his minions got all his idiots riled up claiming the election was stolen.

BTW - you are included in "all his idiots"

This also serves as constant self-justification for traitors that their traitoring on Jan 6 was valid. All they need to do is keep pointing to these "audits" and in their mind, the idiot mudpeople like Taj, that the treason committed by himself and his fellow traitors, was at the very worst a bit of mild, necessary criming, or at the very best: extremely patriotic because look at all the "audits!" Obviously they were right!

it's the Bengazi strategy. These people are irredeemable scum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
16,702
13,480
146
My personal experience where i was not replaced on California's rolls for 10 years after leaving the State.
Since it was worth your time to check on whether you were still on Californias rolls answer some questions for us.

So walk us through how you would have voted in CA and your new state. Were you in driving distance or would you have had to fly back and forth?

When you moved, did someone else move into your old place? What would you have done if you tried to vote in CA and they did too from the same address?

How much would your ability to cast a single fraudulent vote in CA make a difference in the elections you could have influenced?

Would it have been worth the travel time and money?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pmv

Pohemi

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2004
8,939
11,575
146
So walk us through how you would have voted in CA and your new state.
It's amusing how Taj's dumbass would have you believe it's just SOO easy to commit voting fraud because he was still listed on another state's rolls, as if that is enough evidence in itself.

Fucking idiot ignores the fact that you can't even hold a valid (ie current) driver's license and declaration of residency in more than one state at a time, much less register to vote in numerous states.

Besides, only well-to-do rethugli-cons with vacation homes around the country have been caught doing that...so ofc he has to project it onto Democrats because derp reasons (and just plain being a dishonest c*nt like always...it IS taj, after all).