Originally posted by: DingDingDao
Awesome. Awesome to the max. (can't remember who said it, but it applies) :beer:
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!
It's an arch.
Ummm.... why is that not realistic?Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ummm.... why is that not realistic?
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!
Seriously, there's no physical difference between those bricks and the empty spaces. So stop trying to prove to me and yourself that you have superhuman eyes with the can (Ed: What the fvck does that mean?) distinguish the difference, because THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE TO THE HUMAN EYE.
Amazing how many people could convince themselves that there is a difference. :roll:
- M4H
Originally posted by: edro13
I challenge you all to Pull out as many blocks as possible, without dropping the top cube!
(I have 107 blocks left standing, before I destroyed it.)
Ultimate Jenga!
Originally posted by: dmw16
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ummm.... why is that not realistic?
nCred is right. After almost 4 years of engineering I would say that looks about right to me..
Also, there are full retail games out there w/ far inferior phyisics engines.