Test this physics engine...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

arcenite

Lifer
Dec 9, 2001
10,660
7
81
It is strangely amusing throwing a few tiny balls at the scaffolding then launching a huge one right through it. Made me laugh in a freaky scientist way...
 

mobobuff

Lifer
Apr 5, 2004
11,099
1
81
Originally posted by: DingDingDao
Awesome. Awesome to the max. (can't remember who said it, but it applies) :beer:

Don't you worry about Planet Express, let me worry about blank.
 

dmw16

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2000
7,608
0
0
quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Ummm.... why is that not realistic?


nCred is right. After almost 4 years of engineering I would say that looks about right to me..

Also, there are full retail games out there w/ far inferior phyisics engines.
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!

Seriously, there's no physical difference between those bricks and the empty spaces. So stop trying to prove to me and yourself that you have superhuman eyes with the can (Ed: What the fvck does that mean?) distinguish the difference, because THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE TO THE HUMAN EYE.

Amazing how many people could convince themselves that there is a difference. :roll:

- M4H
 

mAdMaLuDaWg

Platinum Member
Feb 15, 2003
2,437
1
0
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!

Seriously, there's no physical difference between those bricks and the empty spaces. So stop trying to prove to me and yourself that you have superhuman eyes with the can (Ed: What the fvck does that mean?) distinguish the difference, because THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE TO THE HUMAN EYE.

Amazing how many people could convince themselves that there is a difference. :roll:

- M4H

Wahahahah! 0wnage!
 

Kelemvor

Lifer
May 23, 2002
16,928
8
81
Anyone get the car to drive through the spiral loop ramp thingie? I can't get it to stay on, always falls off because it goes too slow.

 

SonicIce

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2004
4,771
0
76
I saw something exactly the block demo on an Unreal Engine 3.0 E3 dvd. The guy poined at one of the lower blocks and pulled it up and everything crumbled realistically like in that Meqon thing. We'll have physics like this soon I hope!
 

yhelothar

Lifer
Dec 11, 2002
18,409
39
91
Originally posted by: dmw16
quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Ummm.... why is that not realistic?


nCred is right. After almost 4 years of engineering I would say that looks about right to me..

Also, there are full retail games out there w/ far inferior phyisics engines.

OK Mr. Engineer. Explain how the laws of physics allow these two blocks to hang on the ledge without falling?
:disgust:

I agree that this is a great physics engine -the best we've seen yet - but it's certainly not realistic.
 

no0b

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2001
3,804
1
0
after having the race car hit a 6 in bumb having it fly 15 feet in the air and rotate atleast 20 times while in the air, and landing on its feet. I would not call this realistic at all.