• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Test this physics engine...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
It is strangely amusing throwing a few tiny balls at the scaffolding then launching a huge one right through it. Made me laugh in a freaky scientist way...
 
quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Ummm.... why is that not realistic?
Click to expand...


nCred is right. After almost 4 years of engineering I would say that looks about right to me..

Also, there are full retail games out there w/ far inferior phyisics engines.
 
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!
Click to expand...

Seriously, there's no physical difference between those bricks and the empty spaces. So stop trying to prove to me and yourself that you have superhuman eyes with the can (Ed: What the fvck does that mean?) distinguish the difference, because THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE TO THE HUMAN EYE.

Amazing how many people could convince themselves that there is a difference. :roll:

- M4H
 
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!
Click to expand...

Seriously, there's no physical difference between those bricks and the empty spaces. So stop trying to prove to me and yourself that you have superhuman eyes with the can (Ed: What the fvck does that mean?) distinguish the difference, because THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE TO THE HUMAN EYE.

Amazing how many people could convince themselves that there is a difference. :roll:

- M4H
Click to expand...

Wahahahah! 0wnage!
 
Anyone get the car to drive through the spiral loop ramp thingie? I can't get it to stay on, always falls off because it goes too slow.

 
I saw something exactly the block demo on an Unreal Engine 3.0 E3 dvd. The guy poined at one of the lower blocks and pulled it up and everything crumbled realistically like in that Meqon thing. We'll have physics like this soon I hope!
 
Originally posted by: dmw16
quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
the physics sucks ass, not realistic!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Ummm.... why is that not realistic?
Click to expand...


nCred is right. After almost 4 years of engineering I would say that looks about right to me..

Also, there are full retail games out there w/ far inferior phyisics engines.
Click to expand...

OK Mr. Engineer. Explain how the laws of physics allow these two blocks to hang on the ledge without falling?
:disgust:

I agree that this is a great physics engine -the best we've seen yet - but it's certainly not realistic.
 
after having the race car hit a 6 in bumb having it fly 15 feet in the air and rotate atleast 20 times while in the air, and landing on its feet. I would not call this realistic at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top