• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Terrorist Test Run?

illusion88 said:
Did you?
"Almurisi, 28, of Vallejo, Calif., has no clear or known ties to terrorism, authorities say"
Click to expand...
This. Because the witnesses undoubtedly had it wrong. He was probably saying Almond Joy bar, not Allahu Akbar, merely wanted some candy from the pilots, and was going to beat down the cockpit door to get it. Poor, misunderstood guy.
 
TastesLikeChicken said:
This. Because the witnesses undoubtedly had it wrong. He was probably saying Almond Joy bar, not Allahu Akbar, merely wanted some candy from the pilots, and was going to beat down the cockpit door to get it. Poor, misunderstood guy.
Click to expand...

Ok how would any of that make this a "test run"
 
This is what an actual test run looks like.

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/woods.asp


​
One of the practice flights may have occurred in August. Actor James Woods was so shaken by a flight he took from Boston to Los Angeles about a month before the attacks that he told an attendant and authorities of his suspicions when he landed. Woods was in first-class and the only other passengers in the section were four men who appeared to be Middle Eastern in origin.
During the entire six-hour flight, Woods noticed the men neither ate nor drank. They talked to each other in whispers and did not read or sleep. On Sept. 12, Woods called the FBI to tell investigators about his experience. He was interviewed by agents on Sept. 13. Woods’s spokesman told Reuters the actor thought it ”prudent not to comment on this and let the FBI continue to do their job, which they seem to be doing superbly right now.”​
Click to expand...
If it wasn't for 9/11 would you label Woods as a fear mongering bigot (what exactly did the 4 men do that implied malicious intent besides being Middle Eastern) or a concerned citizen?
 
1prophet said:
This is what an actual test run looks like.

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/woods.asp


​
If it wasn't for 9/11 would you label Woods as a fear mongering bigot (what exactly did the 4 men do that implied malicious intent besides being Middle Eastern) or a concerned citizen?
Click to expand...

5_aug_s_Tragedy.gif
 
No reason to think this was a trial for anything, what did he learn? The same thing we've all learned a half dozen times since 911 which is that passengers obviously have no qualms whatsoever interdicting and seizing people who act badly on planes? These people assume, and rightly, that if somebody gets in the cockpit they are going to die anyway, so there is little reason to not get involved. Contrast with a similar type event in public people will stand there and just watch, but not on a plane, not anymore.
 
JSt0rm said:
oh and dont forget my little republicans

http://goodmenproject.com/newsroom/study-of-the-day-conservative-brains-have-bigger-fear-centers/
Click to expand...
Oh, how I've been longing to bring this up yet again...

http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=51327

- Conservatives have no courage, which means all the courageous soldiers in the world are progressives. Those war mongering, baby killers!

-Conservatives have larger amygdalas which accounts for their fear of terrorism. But the fear of global catastrophic weather, acid rain, DDT, freon, the Zeitgeist, inside jobs, the patriot act, carbon dioxide, sugar, salt, Wal-Mart, alar, non-unions, prayer in school, SUV’s, guns, cul-de-sacs, pesticides, the white nuclear family, Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, black conservatives, job performance testing, David Horowitz lecture tours, Fox News, drawing Mohammad etc. remains a mystery to researchers.

-conservatives like to plan based on the worst-case scenario, while liberals tend towards rosier outlooks which is a fancy way of saying that conservatives are more responsible for their actions, while liberals do not care about, nor try to foresee, the consequences of their dumbass theories.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the opportunity.
 
boomerang said:
Oh, how I've been longing to bring this up yet again...

http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=51327

- Conservatives have no courage, which means all the courageous soldiers in the world are progressives. Those war mongering, baby killers!

-Conservatives have larger amygdalas which accounts for their fear of terrorism. But the fear of global catastrophic weather, acid rain, DDT, freon, the Zeitgeist, inside jobs, the patriot act, carbon dioxide, sugar, salt, Wal-Mart, alar, non-unions, prayer in school, SUV’s, guns, cul-de-sacs, pesticides, the white nuclear family, Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, black conservatives, job performance testing, David Horowitz lecture tours, Fox News, drawing Mohammad etc. remains a mystery to researchers.

-conservatives like to plan based on the worst-case scenario, while liberals tend towards rosier outlooks which is a fancy way of saying that conservatives are more responsible for their actions, while liberals do not care about, nor try to foresee, the consequences of their dumbass theories.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the opportunity.
Click to expand...


LMAO!!!!!
 
TastesLikeChicken said:
It could certainly viewed as a possibility. Those with known ties to terrorism are unlikely to be flying in the first place.
Click to expand...

TLC Logic:

No links to terrorism = hey, he could be one anyway
No proof of test run = hey, it could be one anyway

Conclusion:

Anyone that flies on a plane in TLC's twisted mind could be a terrorist on a test run.

Amazing logic TLC, you have just made everyone in the world a terrorist suspect.Waterboarding for all!
 
Terrorist Test Run?
Click to expand...



Is that where you grab a gas station attendant or taxi driver, shoot him twice with a paintball gun, and then toss him into a swimming pool?
 
Last edited:
I noticed how the media was falling all over itself saying "he was yelling unintelligibly", then they changed the story to he was yelling "god is great."

Then passengers corrected them saying "nope, he was yelling 'alah akbar'"

The media and president have shown this pattern of anything that looks like muslim terrorism, they will deny it is any such thing.
 
GarfieldtheCat said:
TLC Logic:

No links to terrorism = hey, he could be one anyway
No proof of test run = hey, it could be one anyway

Conclusion:

Anyone that flies on a plane in TLC's twisted mind could be a terrorist on a test run.

Amazing logic TLC, you have just made everyone in the world a terrorist suspect.Waterboarding for all!
Click to expand...
Anyone who flies on a plane could be a terrorist? Really? Is that what I'm saying?

How about when someone bulls down the ailse of a plane yelling "Allahu Akbar" and tries to break down the cockpit door? I guess "logic," in your mind, is completely ignoring the facts of the situation?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top