Teenager Charged With Child Pornography

[Rogue]

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: pulse8
Does that mean if I photograph myself masturbating it would be considered gay porn?

In your case it'd be a crime against nature.

Not likely. Actually trying to reproduce with the opposite sex would be a crime against nature in this case. 😉😀

 

[DrPizza]

Maybe she's an out of control teenager and the parents are using the help of the state police... by getting her charged, they can more easily force her into some sort of program.

 

[Orsorum]

Originally posted by: DrPizza
Maybe she's an out of control teenager and the parents are using the help of the state police... by getting her charged, they can more easily force her into some sort of program.

At which point she cheats her way through by sleeping with the coed counseling staff?





As per my fantasy?

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: DrPizza
Maybe she's an out of control teenager and the parents are using the help of the state police... by getting her charged, they can more easily force her into some sort of program.

At which point she cheats her way through by sleeping with the coed counseling staff?





As per my fantasy?

i thought you were leaving this thread?

 

[sillymofo]

Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?

I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well? 😕

Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....😱

 

[Orsorum]

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: DrPizza
Maybe she's an out of control teenager and the parents are using the help of the state police... by getting her charged, they can more easily force her into some sort of program.

At which point she cheats her way through by sleeping with the coed counseling staff?





As per my fantasy?

i thought you were leaving this thread?

It was too good to resist. 🙁

 

[Nebor]

This is ridiculous...

 

[SSP]

Its Redicu-ras.

 

[Pepsei]

By the way, do not post a link to her pic, you'll be contributing to the delinquency of a minor, plus a string of other offenses.

 

[ShotgunSteven]

Originally posted by: cr4zymofo

Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?

I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well? 😕

Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....😱

If she was, would she be charged for having sex with a minor?

 

[fs5]

Originally posted by: nick1985
:camera:'s?

she's 15 ya sicko.

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: cr4zymofo

Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?

I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well? 😕

Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....😱

nope. wouldn't she get charged with child molestation?

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: fivespeed5

Originally posted by: nick1985
:camera:'s?

she's 15 ya sicko.

dude hes like 15

 

[Orsorum]

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: cr4zymofo

Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?

I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well? 😕

Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....😱

nope. wouldn't she get charged with child molestation?

Hey, you could do like Jocelyn Elders and even suggest that masturbation be mentioned in public school curricula, then get fired for it.

 

[jonMEGA]

When I was 15, I was known to masterbate like five times a day. They should arrest me for molestation... 😛

 

[Kenazo]

though quite foolish, I don't think that it will matter that she's been charged. As a young offender, they won't do much to her anyway.

 

[fs5]

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: fivespeed5

Originally posted by: nick1985
:camera:'s?

she's 15 ya sicko.

dude hes like 15

he's 18 (assuming 1985 is his birth year)

 

[FuZoR]

haahha...

interesting! charging a child for child porn of her own pictures.... wow did'nt think that was possible.

 

[nick1985]

Originally posted by: fivespeed5

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: fivespeed5

Originally posted by: nick1985
:camera:'s?

she's 15 ya sicko.

dude hes like 15

he's 18 (assuming 1985 is his birth year)

1985 + 18 != 2004 :Q

 

[Crazymofo]

Originally posted by: cr4zymofo

Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?

I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well? 😕

Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....😱

god dangit I thought you were gone for good!!! 😛:|😛:|😀

 

[halik]

Originally posted by: nick1985

Originally posted by: fivespeed5

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: fivespeed5

Originally posted by: nick1985
:camera:'s?

she's 15 ya sicko.

dude hes like 15

he's 18 (assuming 1985 is his birth year)

1985 + 18 != 2004 :Q

hes 19.... o well pics anyway....

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: Crazymofo

Originally posted by: cr4zymofo

Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?

I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well? 😕

Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....😱

god dangit I thought you were gone for good!!! 😛:|😛:|😀

whoa! twins!

 

[fs5]

Originally posted by: nick1985

Originally posted by: fivespeed5

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: fivespeed5

Originally posted by: nick1985
:camera:'s?

she's 15 ya sicko.

dude hes like 15

he's 18 (assuming 1985 is his birth year)

1985 + 18 != 2004 :Q

I was ALSO assuming your birthday hasn't passed yet since it's only march/april.

 

[Mallow]

gg Judicial System... maybe try and get this screwed up kid some therapy. She is taking pictures of her underaged self and distributing them to older men... she obviously has some issues...

People can be so clueless.

 

[Amorphus]

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: Crazymofo

Originally posted by: cr4zymofo

Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?

I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well? 😕

Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....😱

god dangit I thought you were gone for good!!! 😛:|😛:|😀

whoa! twins!

Yeah, I just saw that too... :Q