Not likely. Actually trying to reproduce with the opposite sex would be a crime against nature in this case.
Not likely. Actually trying to reproduce with the opposite sex would be a crime against nature in this case.
DrPizza
Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Maybe she's an out of control teenager and the parents are using the help of the state police... by getting her charged, they can more easily force her into some sort of program.
At which point she cheats her way through by sleeping with the coed counseling staff?
As per my fantasy?
Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?
I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well?
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?
I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well?
If she was, would she be charged for having sex with a minor?
waggy
No Lifer
- Dec 14, 2000
- 68,143
- 10
- 81
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?
I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well?
nope. wouldn't she get charged with child molestation?
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?
I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well?
nope. wouldn't she get charged with child molestation?
Hey, you could do like Jocelyn Elders and even suggest that masturbation be mentioned in public school curricula, then get fired for it.
When I was 15, I was known to masterbate like five times a day. They should arrest me for molestation...
though quite foolish, I don't think that it will matter that she's been charged. As a young offender, they won't do much to her anyway.
haahha...
interesting! charging a child for child porn of her own pictures.... wow did'nt think that was possible.
interesting! charging a child for child porn of her own pictures.... wow did'nt think that was possible.
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?
I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well?
god dangit I thought you were gone for good!!!
:|:|
waggy
No Lifer
- Dec 14, 2000
- 68,143
- 10
- 81
Originally posted by: Crazymofo
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?
I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well?
god dangit I thought you were gone for good!!!
whoa! twins!
gg Judicial System... maybe try and get this screwed up kid some therapy. She is taking pictures of her underaged self and distributing them to older men... she obviously has some issues...
People can be so clueless.
People can be so clueless.
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Crazymofo
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Well, it's not child porn if she's not playing with herself... OK, now I've done it, I've put thoughts into your heads.....Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?
I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well?
god dangit I thought you were gone for good!!!
whoa! twins!
Yeah, I just saw that too... :Q
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter