funny stuff...it would be great if she went to apply for a job and they did a background check and found she was charge with child pornography
NICE MOVE!
NICE MOVE!
Originally posted by: tagej
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?
I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well?
according to their interpretation of the law, apparently yes.
HA, I live in Greensburg. Latrobe is like 5 minutes away from my house. Who'da thought my town would've made ATOT top topic of the minute.
Anyways, it sounds like the typical crap people do around here. I always said that there was nothing to do around here, but as you can see, people amuse themselves.
I don't agree that the charges should be so harsh though. Probably just trying to set an example and try to keep kids safe. Lots of online stalker stuff going on or whatever.
Anyways, it sounds like the typical crap people do around here. I always said that there was nothing to do around here, but as you can see, people amuse themselves.
I don't agree that the charges should be so harsh though. Probably just trying to set an example and try to keep kids safe. Lots of online stalker stuff going on or whatever.
Where do you draw the line though? If they don't prosecute for this, then in theory, all a pervert has to do is talk the child into taking their own pictures and giving them to him. Child porn is illegal, doesn't matter who made it.
neutralizer
Lifer
- Oct 4, 2001
- 11,552
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: jonMEGA
When I was 15, I was known to masterbate like five times a day. They should arrest me for molestation...
something i didnt NEED to know
Does this mean....
If I was to take "explicit" pictures of myself when I was, say 14, and then distrubute them when I was, say 40, I would suffer the full force of the child pornography laws?
Even if, for lack of a better reason, it envolved no one else but me? I was exploiting myself when I was 14, because I am 40 at the time of distribution?
I call paradox!
If I was to take "explicit" pictures of myself when I was, say 14, and then distrubute them when I was, say 40, I would suffer the full force of the child pornography laws?
Even if, for lack of a better reason, it envolved no one else but me? I was exploiting myself when I was 14, because I am 40 at the time of distribution?
I call paradox!
AreaCode707
Lifer
- Sep 21, 2001
- 18,447
- 133
- 106
They're using legal methods to prevent her from spreading child porn pics to perverts. It's an attempt to limit what's going out to the internet pervs of the world such as yourselves. And yeah, this gets her in a position where maybe she'll never try something like this until she's of age.
Well, at least get her to wait until one minute after she turns 18, because that's better somehow...
I love how our society is structured.
No, I think that just means she has to knock on her own door and inform herself that she is a convicted sex offender.
lol...Originally posted by: AvesPKS
No, I think that just means she has to knock on her own door and inform herself that she is a convicted sex offender.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter