Zorkorist
Diamond Member
- Apr 17, 2007
- 6,861
- 3
- 76
Does that include the victim who wants this dropped?All of you that support this sick fuck are as morally culpable as he is. :thumbsdown:
Does that include the victim who wants this dropped?
Her and the makers of Viagra.Last time I checked no one in this thread is a victim of his. The argument that he's too old to go to prison, or that it wasn't "rape rape" is about as good of an excuse as pardoning him because he makes good movies.
And victims don't get to decide if someone is prosecuted. If he did this again, would she be willing to take the blame?
Last time I checked no one in this thread is a victim of his. The argument that he's too old to go to prison, or that it wasn't "rape rape" is about as good of an excuse as pardoning him because he makes good movies.
And victims don't get to decide if someone is prosecuted. If he did this again, would she be willing to take the blame?
You're being stupid, it's been a long time and I haven't seen a whole gaggle of children running around crying about how this guy raped them.
Do you feel the same way about former Nazi guards? Justice is justice. It doesn't matter how long it's been.
Do you feel the same way about former Nazi guards? Justice is justice. It doesn't matter how long it's been.
Pfizer made me do it! :awe:Her and the makers of Viagra.
So you're saying he won't do it again because no one has come forward and he hasn't done it yet? LOL, seriously?You're being stupid, it's been a long time and I haven't seen a whole gaggle of children running around crying about how this guy raped them.
It was the US justice that failed - not the Swiss justice system.
Ask why did the DA not provide the documentation that the Swiss requested to justify the extradition.
Nazis... really, that's the comparison you want to go with?
Yes it is. Are you saying he should get a free pass because his crimes do not stand up to Hitler's?
So you're saying he won't do it again because no one has come forward and he hasn't done it yet? LOL, seriously?
And as if once isn't enough to punish him.![]()
There are any number of better ways to spend time and money other than chasing down this old man just because you think it's a good idea.
And if your aunt had a dick she'd be your uncle. Prosecutors are obligated to pursue justice and Polanski got off scott-free.
All of you that support this sick fuck are as morally culpable as he is. :thumbsdown:
Prosecutors are obligated to pursue justice and Polanski got off scott-free.
Last time I checked no one in this thread is a victim of his. The argument that he's too old to go to prison, or that it wasn't "rape rape" is about as good of an excuse as pardoning him because he makes good movies.
And victims don't get to decide if someone is prosecuted. If he did this again, would she be willing to take the blame?
We live in a world of limited resources. Pursuing this guy after all these years is a waste and most likely motivated by ego not some noble desire for justice.
And judges are obligated to perform their duties free of political considerations. As has been widely reported, Polanski's judge allowed his re-election fears to lead him to renege on the terms of the plea bargain he'd previously agreed to.
That being the case, Polanski would have been within his rights to rescind his guilty plea, but it is highly questionable whether he could have received a fair trial at that point. In other words, Polanski's ability to successfully defend himself was severely compromised by the actions of the judge.
Naturally, your concept of "justice" extends only to the obligations of the government, and you seem unable to fathom that "justice" also means not using the system to screw over defendants.
how much time has he served for evading the law?