• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Stupid AntiAbortion Photo circulating Social Media

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Stayfr0sty said:
A woman that got raped doesnt want to see a "little" version of her rapist running around years later.


Your comparing a human fetus to bacteria?
Wow Im sure you got all A+ in science class!!
Click to expand...

NO, the picture compares a human fetus to something like bacteria. Did you read the OP or look at the image? We're all commenting on the absurdity of the image.
 
airdata said:
masturbation = genocide

I will say though... once the fetus has features, if you abort you're taking a life.
Click to expand...

That is why you're a retarded human being. one that doesn't understand that a fetus has a feture even before it becomes a fetus.

What it isn't is alive and if we are to use the same measurement that we do when someone is dead, a fetus isn't alive until week 25.

A human with that brain activity is dead, in uteri or exterio uteri.

I'd like to hear a proper objection to that.
 
GundamW said:
How about no abortion after the 1st heart beat?
Click to expand...

How about a 60 or 90 day warranty period? If you do not like the baby before the first 60 or 90 days, just return it to the hospital where it was born for a full refund. The hospital will then take care of the disposal.
 
homercles337 said:
Ichinisan said:
TechBoyJK said:
I'll eat my foot on that statement, but I would bet on it. Maybe not my 'hand' but based on what we know about Titan, I think it's more than likely there is something primordial going on there.

I've watched a lot of 'universe' stuff including many Hawkins documentary. However, I don't agree with the statement that science has ruled out 'life' among planetary bodies in our solar system.
Click to expand...
I didn't mean to suggest that it's ruled out, but it's highly improbable.
Click to expand...

Thats not what you said:

Ichinisan said:
... Scientists believe it's a mathematical certainty that life exists elsewhere in the universe, but not in our own Solar system and NOT on Titan.
Click to expand...

Mathematical certainty (perfect knowledge) is a much higher bar than probabilistic certainty. Your post claims perfect knowledge, VERY far from where we are scientifically.
Click to expand...

It's not clear which point you are contesting. I said that some scientists believe it's a "mathematical certainty" that life exists somewhere else in the universe...and you correctly pointed out that I should have said "probabilistic certainty." Thanks for that clarification.

...anyway, I was saying that life elsewhere in the universe is considered extremely probable, but life on other planets in our own Solar System is considered to be highly improbable.
 
Ichinisan said:
...anyway, I was saying that life elsewhere in the universe is considered extremely probable, but life on other planets in our own Solar System is considered to be highly improbable.
Click to expand...

And this is because we've already been able to get a decent idea of what's going on with all of the planetary bodies in our solar system and make conclusions that on this small group of objects, besides Earth, any kind of life, simple or complex, is unlikely, based on what it takes to allow life as 'we know it'.

However, the vast numbers of planetary bodies across the universe flips the scale the other direction making the probability in favor of life.

correct?
 
TechBoyJK said:
And this is because we've already been able to get a decent idea of what's going on with all of the planetary bodies in our solar system and make conclusions that on this small group of objects, besides Earth, any kind of life, simple or complex, is unlikely, based on what it takes to allow life as 'we know it'.

However, the vast numbers of planetary bodies across the universe flips the scale the other direction making the probability in favor of life.

correct?
Click to expand...
Yes.

...and the scientists can only work on the assumption of life "as we know it." We don't have a good explanation for the development of the first single-celled DNA-based organism, so I really don't know how they can calculate the odds...but I'm sure Stephen Hawking (and the rest) thought about it much more than I.

Of course, you could say that there are forms of life we can't conceive. Would we really consider it "life?"

Anyway, just having non-water seas and precipitation doesn't really increase the chances of life forming versus other odds.
 
the worst part about the whole pro/anti abortion issue is that its so heated that it detracts from what really should be able to largely solve the issue - sex education and contraception
 
bunnyfubbles said:
the worst part about the whole pro/anti abortion issue is that its so heated that it detracts from what really should be able to largely solve the issue - sex education and contraception
Click to expand...


sex education and contraception "might" help, but wht we really need is more oral and anal sex.

If she would have given me a blowjob like I had asked, maybe she would not have gotten knocked up.
 
mnewsham said:
A woman who had sex with an asshole at a party and later founds out she really hates the bastard because all he does is smoke pot and lay around all day looking to have sex doesn't want to see a "little" version of her one night stand running around years later.
Click to expand...
1)If she had sex with some dude at a party thats her choice. She wasnt forced to like getting raped.... Two adults having consenting sex with each other should be responsible and know that a baby could happen if no contraceptive is used. If they are irresponsible and get knocked up thats her problem, and killing the kid is nothing but a cowardly "get out of jail free" card.
2) What does pot have anything to do with this subject?


homercles337 said:
You're comparing a human fetus to a zygote? Wow Im sure you are a total failure in life.
Click to expand...
Its still a life, nuff said now go away n00b.
 
Last edited:
lol

Life in the solar system besides us... LOL

Yeah, ok. It's also possible that there are hundreds of tripod alien ships underneath the ground that we haven't detected... and they're gonna have aliens beamed into them... THEN WORLD DOMINATION! PEW PEW PEW! But, that's just 'highly improbable.'

Btw, highly improbable is also a synonym with 'not gonna fucking happen'.
 
Stayfr0sty said:
1)If she had sex with some dude at a party thats her choice. She wasnt forced to like getting raped.... Two adults having consenting sex with each other should be responsible and know that a baby could happen if no contraceptive is used. If they are irresponsible and get knocked up thats her problem, and killing the kid is nothing but a cowardly "get out of jail free" card.
Click to expand...

If the mommy and daddy to be don't want a kid, they shouldn't be forced to have one because they made a mistake. That's just what we need, more "mistakes" in the world.

In the bigger picture, abortion is the more sane of the two options. You can't change basic human behavior, but you can give them options in the event of the inevitable.
 
Eli said:
If the mommy and daddy to be don't want a kid, they shouldn't be forced to have one because they made a mistake. That's just what we need, more "mistakes" in the world.

In the bigger picture, abortion is the more sane of the two options. You can't change basic human behavior, but you can give them options in the event of the inevitable.
Click to expand...

Riddle me this riddle me that, can you name any animals in the animal kingdom that willfully kill their child while its still in womb with the exception of male lions eating cubs of other males once they are already born?
 
Stayfr0sty said:
Riddle me this riddle me that, can you name any animals in the animal kingdom that willfully kill their child while its still in womb with the exception of male lions eating cubs of other males once they are already born?
Click to expand...

.. so what? Can you name any other animals that <insert one of the billion things that humans do/can do that animals are incapable of>?
 
Stayfr0sty said:
You seem to miss my point.....
Click to expand...

I guess I did too, because that was my thought. So what's your point? 😛

If we went about everything like that, we would still be living pre-stone age. The ability to make decisions like that is a large part of what makes us human and differentiates us from other animals in the first place.

Would you argue that it would be better to terminate the offspring after it's out of the womb? Because there are certainly other animals that do that.
 
Stayfr0sty said:
1)If she had sex with some dude at a party thats her choice. She wasnt forced to like getting raped.... Two adults having consenting sex with each other should be responsible and know that a baby could happen if no contraceptive is used. If they are irresponsible and get knocked up thats her problem, and killing the kid is nothing but a cowardly "get out of jail free" card.
Click to expand...
Consent to sex is not consent to become nor remain pregnant.

Its still a life, nuff said now go away n00b.
Click to expand...
Please find, read, and comprehend my first post in this thread.
 
Pro lifers are stupid to begin with so I am not at all surprised that they are circulating a stupid photo online...
 
Stayfr0sty said:
Riddle me this riddle me that, can you name any animals in the animal kingdom that willfully kill their child while its still in womb with the exception of male lions eating cubs of other males once they are already born?
Click to expand...

They do worse. They kill after the kids are born. Check out some of our closest living relatives (genetically speaking). They practice infanticide regularly in some species. If you prefer we can move to that method instead.
 
Eli said:
I guess I did too, because that was my thought. So what's your point? 😛

If we went about everything like that, we would still be living pre-stone age. The ability to make decisions like that is a large part of what makes us human and differentiates us from other animals in the first place.

Would you argue that it would be better to terminate the offspring after it's out of the womb? Because there are certainly other animals that do that.
Click to expand...
I already said there are lions that eat other males cubs....
But my point is that abortion is not natural, animals dont do it, and we are basically animals with big brains.

Cerpin Taxt said:
Consent to sex is not consent to become nor remain pregnant.
.
Click to expand...

Yes it is. Education is whats needed and contraceptives period. If the dumb skank and douche bangin her dont wear protection thats their fault.
DesiPower said:
Pro lifers are stupid to begin with so I am not at all surprised that they are circulating a stupid photo online...
Click to expand...

Care to back up your claim? Heres some food for thought from a leftist point of view may I add.
http://slv80.tripod.com/prowoman.html

http://anarchyinabottle.blogspot.co...11/abortion-anarchism-and-date-with-emma.html

Read up and try to use your brain a bit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top