Student Loan Forgiveness is Set to Expire: This is Going to be Painful for Many!

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
30,988
2,680
126
I never signed a contract to give PPP handouts to all the asshole local business owners that are now flooding my community Facebook page with posts about how much they hate government handouts, yet here we are. Fuck off.

You do realize PPP money went right into employees pockets, correct?

Granted there were dirt bags who just bought lambo's and/or created fake businesses to steal the money but many of those idiots are facing time in federal prison for their efforts.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: KMFJD and iRONic

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,918
2,883
136
You do realize PPP money went right into employees pockets, correct?

Granted there were dirt bags who just bought lambo's and/or created fake businesses to steal the money but many of those idiots are facing time in federal prison for their efforts.

Oh so you're fine with handouts to the employees then? Great, me too! Anyways I know plenty of people who still had their company going full time that got PPP loans forgiven.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,290
32,788
136
You do realize PPP money went right into employees pockets, correct?

Granted there were dirt bags who just bought lambo's and/or created fake businesses to steal the money but many of those idiots are facing time in federal prison for their efforts.
Which face do we listen to when you are cool with PPP loans being forgiven in full but not 10K in student loans forgiven?

Who knew Tom Brady and Kanye West are too poor to pay their loans back
 

kitkat22

Golden Member
Feb 10, 2005
1,464
1,333
136
Thankfully my undergraduate debt was <$10000. I graduated from a private medical school with $420000 in debt. I currently pay $3250/mo on a 15yr term and I am now approaching $260000.

I am ok with some loan forgiveness.I make way more than $125000 and to be honest 10k really won't make that much of a difference to me.

I did transfer my loans into Sofi for the lower interest rate. Went from 8.4% on some of the larger loans to about 5%.

I spent several years working for a private practice so I didn't qualify for the PSLF stuff.

My biggest complaint is why the freak is tuition so expensive!
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

NWRMidnight

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,563
3,081
136
Student loans are a voluntary system, you have to actively seek them out and agree to pay them back. Tax cuts are a reduction in the amount of money we have to pay under threat of force. They are completely different situations.
I only read a couple of the responses to you on this. What I am going to add to what others have said is this:. Until advanced education isn't for the most part a requirement to earn a living wage, taking on such debt is not a voluntary choice, it is a requirement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54 and KMFJD

NWRMidnight

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,563
3,081
136
You do realize PPP money went right into employees pockets, correct?

Granted there were dirt bags who just bought lambo's and/or created fake businesses to steal the money but many of those idiots are facing time in federal prison for their efforts.
Only a portion of it was required to go to pay employee wages. The majority went to the actual business and used with in the approved guidelines. Example is it could be used for business improvements, upgrades, equipment repair/replacement, renovations, etc., As well as other expenses required to keep the doors open. Not just employee wages.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,039
136
You do realize PPP money went right into employees pockets, correct?


How does that change anything? If a profit-making business takes a 'loan' and uses it to pay their employees - then gets the loan forgiven and then complains about "irresponsibility" with regard to student loan forgiveness, how does the fact the money went to the employees make any difference to the hypocrisy involved? Whether its Prager U, Steven Crowder or the Daily Caller. Money going to their employees (who tend to share the politics of their employer) is still indirectly benefiting the business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KMFJD

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
How does that change anything? If a profit-making business takes a 'loan' and uses it to pay their employees - then gets the loan forgiven and then complains about "irresponsibility" with regard to student loan forgiveness, how does the fact the money went to the employees make any difference to the hypocrisy involved? Whether its Prager U, Steven Crowder or the Daily Caller. Money going to their employees (who tend to share the politics of their employer) is still indirectly benefiting the business.
The counter argument is that the government forced business to close and no one forced students to take loans. Also, that PPP loans were always intended to be forgiven unlike student loans.

I think the former argument is pretty reductive and I don't support either argument, but they have SOME merit which makes them good talking points for those who don't want anything more than superficial discussion.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,749
20,323
146
The counter argument is that the government forced business to close and no one forced students to take loans. Also, that PPP loans were always intended to be forgiven unlike student loans.

I think the former argument is pretty reductive and I don't support either argument, but they have SOME merit which makes them good talking points for those who don't want anything more than superficial discussion.

fair point, yet nobody forced a business to run a thin margins and subsequently require a government bailout.

I think keeping the economy from complete collapse was a good move, and this student loan move is also a good move for Economic reasons
 

Lezunto

Golden Member
Oct 24, 2020
1,070
968
106
Naturally, Trump whined about Biden's loan forgiveness program.

He also had the nerve to complain about schools fleecing students when his shuttered Trump University had to pay $25 million to settle lawsuits from former students who charged the for-profit and unlicensed school with fraud.

The school, shut down in 2010, offered fake diplomas, according to some critics.

 
  • Like
Reactions: KMFJD and Fenixgoon

GoPackGo

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2003
6,518
591
126
The counter argument is that the government forced business to close and no one forced students to take loans. Also, that PPP loans were always intended to be forgiven unlike student loans.

I think the former argument is pretty reductive and I don't support either argument, but they have SOME merit which makes them good talking points for those who don't want anything more than superficial discussion.

No one forced people to take student loans... but when you are young until you finish high school you are told to go to college. Not just by the schools, but parents, other family members, etc... You are a failure / loser if you don't go. I go back to my main point... high interest rates along with capitalized interest make getting out from under the debt nearly impossible for many people. If what you earn vs what you can afford in student loan repayments is less than the interest, at the end of that year you will owe more than what you started with. You now start paying interest on interest.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
No one forced people to take student loans... but when you are young until you finish high school you are told to go to college. Not just by the schools, but parents, other family members, etc... You are a failure / loser if you don't go. I go back to my main point... high interest rates along with capitalized interest make getting out from under the debt nearly impossible for many people. If what you earn vs what you can afford in student loan repayments is less than the interest, at the end of that year you will owe more than what you started with. You now start paying interest on interest.

Don't need to convince me that the student loan system is essentially indentured servitude.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KMFJD

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,601
46,252
136
The counter argument is that the government forced business to close and no one forced students to take loans. Also, that PPP loans were always intended to be forgiven unlike student loans.

I think the former argument is pretty reductive and I don't support either argument, but they have SOME merit which makes them good talking points for those who don't want anything more than superficial discussion.

Politically having Republcian members of congress stumble through questions about why they took out hundreds of thousands or millions in forgivable loans while opposing this is a productive line of attack. A lot of regular people think thats weird and is sort of offensive when their mumbly defenses are paired with the usual "well people who want this are freeloaders, bootstraps etc" conservative stuff. It's also somewhat inconvenient to be the the party "against inflation" and turn around to say there is no way to lower education prices and that we shouldn't even try.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,572
126
What happens now? What about the people who are going to start school next year? Do they get a 10K gift as well? Have controls been put in place to prevent this from happening again? Has the program been restructured in some way?
This is my problem - nothing about student loans has changed.

the relief for people going forward is the new IBR rules and no interest accruing on amounts above the repayment amount.



Actually she's not an intern. She started as an intern in Phil Murphy's campaign, and was head of the New Jersey official Twitter account which got a lot of buzz under her. She's now a deputy director of the White House social media platforms
as i said. twitter intern.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,230
6,428
136
the relief for people going forward is the new IBR rules and no interest accruing on amounts above the repayment amount.
That's not bad solution. I wonder how many people will utilize the program for the entire 25 years and have the balance forgiven? I also wonder how surprised they're going to be when the IRS comes looking for it's cut at that time.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,287
136
That's not bad solution. I wonder how many people will utilize the program for the entire 25 years and have the balance forgiven? I also wonder how surprised they're going to be when the IRS comes looking for it's cut at that time.
They won’t be surprised at all because it’s not taxed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uclaLabrat

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,230
6,428
136
They won’t be surprised at all because it’s not taxed.
The amount forgiven is taxable according to the article I read. It points to this section of the IRS Q&A.

The tax impact of debt forgiveness or cancellation depends on your individual facts and circumstances. Generally, if you borrow money from a commercial lender and the lender later cancels or forgives the debt, you may have to include the cancelled amount in income for tax purposes. The lender is usually required to report the amount of the canceled debt to you and the IRS on a Form 1099-C, Cancellation of Debt. There are several exceptions to the taxability of cancelled debt, such as insolvency or bankruptcy.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,287
136
The amount forgiven is taxable according to the article I read. It points to this section of the IRS Q&A.

The tax impact of debt forgiveness or cancellation depends on your individual facts and circumstances. Generally, if you borrow money from a commercial lender and the lender later cancels or forgives the debt, you may have to include the cancelled amount in income for tax purposes. The lender is usually required to report the amount of the canceled debt to you and the IRS on a Form 1099-C, Cancellation of Debt. There are several exceptions to the taxability of cancelled debt, such as insolvency or bankruptcy.
Generally that is true, not true for forgiven student loans.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,230
6,428
136
Generally that is true, not true for forgiven student loans.
I didn't see that exception in the IRS Q&A.
The idea makes sense from an IRS prospective. If you borrow money and don't have to repay it, that's income. What the money was spent on doesn't enter the equation unless it's specifically delineated by the IRS.

My guess is that it won't matter for most people. If you've been in the system for twenty five years and still have a balance large enough to make a difference on your taxable income, you've never had much income.

My fundamental issue with all of this is that we created a program to help out people that couldn't afford higher education. That's a good thing, but there were no controls put in place. Clearly that's a problem as we now have a large group of people that can't repay the cost of their education. That "good thing" we did has become a huge burden to the vary people it was designed to help.
We flooded the system with money, drove prices to stratospheric levels, and now have a "crisis" that requires us to add a whole bunch more money to the national debt.
Maybe it's time to consider solving problems by methods other than throwing cash at them.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,287
136
I didn't see that exception in the IRS Q&A.
The idea makes sense from an IRS prospective. If you borrow money and don't have to repay it, that's income. What the money was spent on doesn't enter the equation unless it's specifically delineated by the IRS.

My guess is that it won't matter for most people. If you've been in the system for twenty five years and still have a balance large enough to make a difference on your taxable income, you've never had much income.

My fundamental issue with all of this is that we created a program to help out people that couldn't afford higher education. That's a good thing, but there were no controls put in place. Clearly that's a problem as we now have a large group of people that can't repay the cost of their education. That "good thing" we did has become a huge burden to the vary people it was designed to help.
We flooded the system with money, drove prices to stratospheric levels, and now have a "crisis" that requires us to add a whole bunch more money to the national debt.
Maybe it's time to consider solving problems by methods other than throwing cash at them.
If you look up PSLF you’ll see they are tax free, at least federally.

As far as the problem goes essentially student loans were created to offload the cost of educating people onto the kids because they parents didn’t want to pay for it anymore. It’s too late for the boomers to be responsible but the right answer is to return responsibility.