Stop FCC

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

FoBoT

No Lifer
Apr 30, 2001
63,084
15
81
fobot.com
wow, no posts supporting the raising of the fines yet

i want the fines raised because i think it is funny

big corps are about money and they will change the programming to avoid paying out big $

it cracks me up

also, some of the big radio corps are changing the policy so that the "radio personality" is liable for 1/2 of the fine. that cracks me up too :p

 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
In addition to signing the petition, I have written my congressman and Senator McCain (I am a longtime fan, but he is a co-sponsor of the new "broadcast decency" legislation), and can't wait to wear my new Free Stern t-shirt. I don't want to live in a country taken over by the religious right . . .

That link might not be work safe, depending on where you are working (blonde in a white tank top, kind of scantily clad) ;)

I want the Kippah!
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: FoBoT
wow, no posts supporting the raising of the fines yet

i want the fines raised because i think it is funny

big corps are about money and they will change the programming to avoid paying out big $

it cracks me up

also, some of the big radio corps are changing the policy so that the "radio personality" is liable for 1/2 of the fine. that cracks me up too :p

How can you possibly find all of this funny? I don't care about the last one, maybe the djays should be responsible for some of the fine, but this is all just a stupid knee jerk reaction from idiots that don't realize what those knobs on the radio are for.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: FoBoT
wow, no posts supporting the raising of the fines yet

i want the fines raised because i think it is funny

big corps are about money and they will change the programming to avoid paying out big $

it cracks me up

also, some of the big radio corps are changing the policy so that the "radio personality" is liable for 1/2 of the fine. that cracks me up too :p

Yeah, it's pretty funny to surrender our constitutional freedoms. Enjoy the Fourth Reich!
 

Electrode

Diamond Member
May 4, 2001
6,063
2
81
Originally posted by: Kaervak
Originally posted by: Freejack2
So basically you are saying that you want children to see and hear things that they shouldn't be exposed to?

I neither expect nor want the government to be telling me or my kids (if I ever have them) what I can/can't see or hear. That's my job to do, not theirs.

Signed.
 

FoBoT

No Lifer
Apr 30, 2001
63,084
15
81
fobot.com
yeah, we're all doomed cause HS can't tell potty jokes and discuss anal sex with actors/actresses

you guys crack me up

its as bad as the conservatives crying about gay marriage

everybody has to be an extremist these days :roll:
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
In addition to signing the petition, I have written my congressman and Senator McCain (I am a longtime fan, but he is a co-sponsor of the new "broadcast decency" legislation), and can't wait to wear my new Free Stern t-shirt. I don't want to live in a country taken over by the religious right . . .

That link might not be work safe, depending on where you are working (blonde in a white tank top, kind of scantily clad) ;)

I want the Kippah!

Duly noted and edited. Please spread the word about the petition - this is on the level, and to me this is one of the most important political issues to emerge in my 33 years.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: FoBoT
yeah, we're all doomed cause HS can't tell potty jokes and discuss anal sex with actors/actresses

you guys crack me up

its as bad as the conservatives crying about gay marriage

everybody has to be an extremist these days
rolleye.gif

Did I say doomed? No, don't think I did (although I guess it is possible...). If you don't like what he is saying, TURN THE STATION or TURN IT OFF. Simple. Why should I limit what I can say or be limited in what I can listen to because some idiot 30 miles from me can't get it through his head that he doesn't have to listen to it. Simple solutions for simple problems. Don't punish me (and I don't like Howard Stern, he isn't funny anymore) because irresponsible people keep spreading everyone's favorite sexually transmitted disease.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: FoBoT
yeah, we're all doomed cause HS can't tell potty jokes and discuss anal sex with actors/actresses

you guys crack me up

its as bad as the conservatives crying about gay marriage

everybody has to be an extremist these days
rolleye.gif

I don't consider it an "extremist" position to stick up for civil rights. As far as I can see the extremist position is that of the federal government, which is taking a hardline, religious-right perspective toward censorship of broadcasting. I won't argue further with you, since you appear to be trolling. PM me if you want more discussion on the subject.
 

Spencer278

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 2002
3,637
0
0
Signed I think that only way there will be free speech on the radio again is if CC get broken up or broadcasting becomes a free for all.
 

Led Zeppelin

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 2002
3,555
0
71
Signed. Fvck the FCC and this wannabe-know-nothing-I-only-got-the-job-because-my-daddy's-Colin-Powell Jackass Michael Powell.
 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
Originally posted by: BostonRedSox
Signed. Fvck the FCC and this wannabe-know-nothing-I-only-got-the-job-because-my-daddy's-Colin-Powell Jackass Michael Powell.

my thoughts exactly. :) signed.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
f*ck the children.



considering little johnny is downloading donkey pr0n off the net, i don' t think a little stern is going to phase him.


bump!
 

Vich

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,849
1
0
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
f*ck the children.



considering little johnny is downloading donkey pr0n off the net, i don' t think a little stern is going to phase him.


bump!

ROFL!:D
 

Freejack2

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2000
7,751
8
91
Just to clarify, I don't think it's necessarily right that the government has become the morality police. Parent's should be raising their kids, not leaving it to the government.
One of the problems is with both parents working these days, or single parent households, these parents don't have the time anymore to devote to their kids so they don't notice that little Johnny is downloading donkey pr0n off the net.
Mind you there are a plethora of other problems too and this is only one of them.

Should the government be the morality police? No. However there are many many people who feel they should be.
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
I wish just one of all of you that are screaming about this being the work of the so called "religious right" would explain how they co-opted 172 Democrats into voting for the new legislation? After all we are all led to believe that the "fundies" are marching lock step with the Republican party and the last time I checked the Democrats were not chasing the "fundie" vote.
 

Kilrsat

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2001
1,072
0
0
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
In addition to signing the petition, I have written my congressman and Senator McCain (I am a longtime fan, but he is a co-sponsor of the new "broadcast decency" legislation), and can't wait to wear my new Free Stern t-shirt [WARNING - link does not contain nudity but many not be 100% work safe!]. I don't want to live in a country taken over by the religious right . . .
You live in a country where what is displayed in public or through the public's means is goverened by "contemporary coummity standards." If you look at the law books, most every state or locality will have a law referencing obscene material and broadcasts. Usually defining obscene something like this:

1. The average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find appeals to the prurient interest if taken as a whole;

2. Under contemporary community standards, describes or shows sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and

3. Lacks serious literary, artistic, political, educational or scientific value, if taken as a whole.


This means that radio and tv broadcasts over the air need to follow these standards as they are done through public communication channels. So even taking away the FCC it would leave it up to every state to press charges against those stations airing the material.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
needs a bump. "freedom" bush speaks of sounds more and more like communist chinese freedom:p don't offend...the party..
 

NutBucket

Lifer
Aug 30, 2000
27,151
635
126
E-mail your representatives as well. I sure as hell did. They actually take notice when you write them.
 

DanJ

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
3,509
0
0
Originally posted by: Freejack2
So basically you are saying that you want children to see and hear things that they shouldn't be exposed to?
God forbid you'd have to teach your children about things they're going to be exposed to anyways.

The FCC is out of control.
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
needs a bump. "feedom" bush speaks of sounds more and more like communist chinese freedom:p don't offend...the party..

Educate yourself. The main proponent of this FCC crackdown inside the FCC is Michael Copps. Bush has not even uttered a dozen words about this entire issue.
 

eigen

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2003
4,000
1
0
Signed ,...and may this thread live on the first page until election and if neccessary beyond