dank69
Lifer
- Oct 6, 2009
- 37,343
- 32,955
- 136
Did they claim the economy was better under Trump or that certain metrics were better pre-pandemic? I think I made the latter claim, which is true for median HH income, at least according to the data I could find. That doesn't mean I think Trump was better for the economy or even median income.Have you read much of this thread? There are multiple people saying the economy was better under Trump. I don't think that is a winning message.
Did people claim Democrats shouldn't talk about good economic data or did they claim that calling this the best economy of our lifetimes will rub a lot of people the wrong way? A lot of metrics paint that picture, especially when dealing with averages instead of medians, but there are also a lot of metrics that are really bad. Take income inequality for example. That metric is in really bad territory.This thread is packed with people calming that democrats shouldn't be talking about the good economic data because they economy isn't good for everyone. So if dems aren't allowed to run on the economy is doing better/well, what is the alternative? "The economy today sucks worse than 2019, re-elect me so it can keep sucking?" Seriously read what other wrote.
When a big chunk of the democratic party is out there saying the economy sucks, when pretty much all data says otherwise, it make it much harder to win.
Meanwhile, there were unemployed people willing to attack congress because of "how great Trump had made the economy."
There is an ocean between "the economy is doing fantastic" and "the economy today sucks worse than 2019."