shira
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2005
- 9,567
- 6
- 81
now now shira can't be that stupid.
I certainly can't be a stupid as someone who labels something as "apples and oranges", yet conveniently fails to justify that assertion.
now now shira can't be that stupid.
That is all good and well but making them eat foods they have to swallow five times for every bite is not a parents job.
That was the point i was making, that force feeding your children things that makes them puke in their mouths isn't a bright idea.
Or are you one of those idiots that believe that it cannot be healthy if it tastes ok and since you have to endure the taste of crap your kids should be forced to do so too?
I am not even sure we disagree much here, it's just you acting like a hardarsed idiot who thinks his kids should be treated worse than his pets... You couldn't and wouldn't MAKE your pets eat something they don't like but you demand it from your children?
Son, i've raised two children and am a grandfather and they have NEVER been forced to eat any meal they actually disliked, i raised both of them ALONE and while my cooking hasn't always been great, it got better and i sincerely doubt you and your ms's ever provided a more nutritious meal than what my kids ate and loved to eat three times a day.
"they'll eat what is on their plate" is something you'd NEVER force a dog or a cat to do but somehow, in the US, that is an ok thing for your children? Are you that fucking daft over there?
See, that's where you are veering off the tracks. Please show where anyone [sane] has claimed salt-infused foods to be healthy (butter, OTOH, is quite healthy).I eat a Bacon Egg McGriddle everyday with a large coffee and I feel great. How is fast food actually different than any other food? If your body can digest it and you occasionally get some exercise why wouldn't a reasonable amount of McDonalds be perfectly fine to intake. I think back to the butter smothered, salt infused food that many people eat at home and think that its healthy when it clearly is not.
Supersize Me was a good study of what an outrageous diet could do to your health.
Why don't you explain to us why evolutionary biologists are "apples" - who you think know much more than ATPN posters, but climatologists are "oranges- who you think you know more than? Tell us, in principle, what the difference is between your two widely-divergent statements?
Supersize me is a load of b*llshit. The only thing it proves is that if you eat till you are uncomfortably full of food that your body is not used to processing constantly for weeks on end that your body will be struggling to cope with it. The documentary had little to no journalistic integrity and they had determined their results before starting the project. They set out to prove fast food was bad for you.
Show me a proper scientific study that indicates you will die from eating fast food any more so than I would die if I ate nothing but apples.
In-taking too many calories and fats is not healthy if you are eating too much. Diet is all about balance, variety and setting limits to how much you consume in a day in relation to how many calories you burn.
Check this guy out:
http://mcrunner.com/?page_id=29
That is easy. Climate and evolution are not the same thing. The only relation they have is that climate changes can cause a certain evolutionary change to be more successful than it would have been without the change.
I thought that was obvious.
You are making waggy rethink his post about you.
‘I loved them so much they were all I would eat,’ she said. ‘I just couldn’t face even trying other foods. Mum gave up giving me anything else years ago.’
But I'm not even going to try to explain any of this to you. As they say, you can't fix stupid.
Supersize me is a load of b*llshit. The only thing it proves is that if you eat till you are uncomfortably full of food that your body is not used to processing constantly for weeks on end that your body will be struggling to cope with it. The documentary had little to no journalistic integrity and they had determined their results before starting the project. They set out to prove fast food was bad for you.
Show me a proper scientific study that indicates you will die from eating fast food any more so than I would die if I ate nothing but apples.
In-taking too many calories and fats is not healthy if you are eating too much. Diet is all about balance, variety and setting limits to how much you consume in a day in relation to how many calories you burn.
Check this guy out:
http://mcrunner.com/?page_id=29
Seriously? This is easy.
1. Make normal dinners for one straight week.
2. Tell kid that he/she is welcome to not eat any of it. After a few hours, they'll eat.
3. Repeat until nugget addiction is broken or controlled.
How many foods out there would you only be able to eat it and only it and not be unhealthy?
NPR did a story about this and according to what I heard on the radio the only food you can completely subsist on is breast milk*
*assuming the provider is eating properly (they provided some examples but I do not remember them)