Discussion Speculation: Zen 4 (EPYC 4 "Genoa", Ryzen 7000, etc.)

Page 375 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vattila

Senior member
Oct 22, 2004
799
1,351
136
Except for the details about the improvements in the microarchitecture, we now know pretty well what to expect with Zen 3.

The leaked presentation by AMD Senior Manager Martin Hilgeman shows that EPYC 3 "Milan" will, as promised and expected, reuse the current platform (SP3), and the system architecture and packaging looks to be the same, with the same 9-die chiplet design and the same maximum core and thread-count (no SMT-4, contrary to rumour). The biggest change revealed so far is the enlargement of the compute complex from 4 cores to 8 cores, all sharing a larger L3 cache ("32+ MB", likely to double to 64 MB, I think).

Hilgeman's slides did also show that EPYC 4 "Genoa" is in the definition phase (or was at the time of the presentation in September, at least), and will come with a new platform (SP5), with new memory support (likely DDR5).

Untitled2.png


What else do you think we will see with Zen 4? PCI-Express 5 support? Increased core-count? 4-way SMT? New packaging (interposer, 2.5D, 3D)? Integrated memory on package (HBM)?

Vote in the poll and share your thoughts! :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: richardllewis_01

Carfax83

Diamond Member
Nov 1, 2010
6,841
1,536
136
If you are buying a 13900k/7950X you better have some work that requires heavily threaded performance.

I'm not sure about this. Despite the amount of cores in each CPU, they are still mainstream parts. If I do upgrade this year, I'll probably get either a 13900K or 7900x, and the most multithreaded workloads I ever do are gaming and encoding.

Professional rendering or encoding though typically use Xeon, Threadrippers or Epyc CPUs.

If you only have have work that is lightly threaded, how is it going to perform better on a hybrid design than a regular design, as it is only using a few cores?

I'm talking about performance per watt. The 12900K has better performance per watt than the 5950x in gaming, browsing and other lightly threaded applications as I recall.
 
Jul 27, 2020
16,280
10,317
106
Which is strange because LZMA is branch-misprediction heavy and the much larger uOP-cache in Zen 4 is supposed to help in such workloads. Could it be that we are seeing diminishing returns to increasing the uOP-cache size?
Better to test that theory with something else, like LZMA Utils (tukaani.org). Could be that 7-zip code has some room for improvement left in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaluan

deasd

Senior member
Dec 31, 2013
517
746
136
7z in hwbot is not a good benchmark, 12900k with LN2 @6.7Ghz could only catch up with PBO 5950x which score around 180000mips:


2022-09-22_14-42-49.png



and some 6C result below show it is a mess, I even couldn't tell what 7z is testing, absolutely no affect by ST/MT performance......

2022-09-22_14-38-45.jpg





OTOH the Cinebench result across different version R15 R20 R23, are better than I expected, R23 ~44% faster than a PBO 5950x! but I would rather see stock result cuz the temperature reach limit.
 

Just Benching

Banned
Sep 3, 2022
307
156
76
When NDA Lifts and Reviews come in the entire Ryzen 7000 Line Up Will dominate current Intel Skus. No Questions about it.
What do you meant current? Alderlake? Yeah sure, with the exception of the 7600x getting pummeled by the 12600k, and probably the 7700x getting its ass handed to it by the 12700k, you are right. But they don't compete with alderlake, thry compete with Raptor
 

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
18,246
4,756
136
Uhm, efficiency comparisons should be done at iso wattage. Anything else is flawed.
Not necessarily, as long as you specify the test conditions it is fine by me.

You can test at:
max performance no power limit
iso wattage
optimal performance/watt

All three will give different results and are to me valid test scenarios, but I agree that the first scenario does not make sense in most cases.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
21,629
10,841
136
Also, we'll see if you're still singing the same song when Intel's mainstream CPUs eventually have 32 efficiency cores with the IPC of a Zen 3 core or better.

It is a very, very long wait 'til Arrow Lake. And that assumes no delays (see: Meteor Lake). Add a few more 'very's if Intel stumbles again. Raptor Lake has to anchor desktop for Intel for around two years if current schedules are to be believed. The fact that Raphael - and not even Raphael-X - seems to be positioned to dominate Raptor Lake in a large number of benchmarks is not a good look for Intel.
 

PJVol

Senior member
May 25, 2020
534
447
106
1663841966377.png
I'm curious, is "RPL" officially used anywhere to refer to Intel 13-series cpus?
Saw this abbreviation posted before by the same person (APISAK) regarding raptorlake (just bored, sorry ) )
 
Last edited:

moinmoin

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2017
4,950
7,659
136
If true these would indicate that AMD finally managed to demolish the hard frequency wall as well as the v/f hockey stick curve of previous gens/nodes and support other reports that Zen 4 is essentially solely limited by temperature. Still personally wouldn't believe those numbers for now, feels way too high to be true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scineram and ZGR

nicalandia

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2019
3,330
5,281
136
If true these would indicate that AMD finally managed to demolish the hard frequency wall as well as the v/f hockey stick curve of previous gens/nodes and support other reports that Zen 4 is essentially solely limited by temperature. Still personally wouldn't believe those numbers for now, feels way too high to be true.
APIKSA Has been delivering the Goods lately so I trust the source.