Discussion Speculation: Zen 4 (EPYC 4 "Genoa", Ryzen 7000, etc.)

Page 530 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vattila

Senior member
Oct 22, 2004
820
1,456
136
Except for the details about the improvements in the microarchitecture, we now know pretty well what to expect with Zen 3.

The leaked presentation by AMD Senior Manager Martin Hilgeman shows that EPYC 3 "Milan" will, as promised and expected, reuse the current platform (SP3), and the system architecture and packaging looks to be the same, with the same 9-die chiplet design and the same maximum core and thread-count (no SMT-4, contrary to rumour). The biggest change revealed so far is the enlargement of the compute complex from 4 cores to 8 cores, all sharing a larger L3 cache ("32+ MB", likely to double to 64 MB, I think).

Hilgeman's slides did also show that EPYC 4 "Genoa" is in the definition phase (or was at the time of the presentation in September, at least), and will come with a new platform (SP5), with new memory support (likely DDR5).

Untitled2.png


What else do you think we will see with Zen 4? PCI-Express 5 support? Increased core-count? 4-way SMT? New packaging (interposer, 2.5D, 3D)? Integrated memory on package (HBM)?

Vote in the poll and share your thoughts! :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: richardllewis_01

Gideon

Platinum Member
Nov 27, 2007
2,030
5,034
136
Hmm, it seems AMD actually made its first 4-socket HPC server for MS with only CPUs and monstrous memory bandwidth available. 88x Zen 4 cores clocked at 4Ghz. Four of these have access to 450GB of HBM at ~7.0Tbps bandwidth. Nodes connected via InfiniBand.




I guess under the hood it's just a MI300 derivate with only CPU cores? (Sort of like MI300A but no GPU cores, binned to 88 cores, down from 96)
 
  • Love
Reactions: lightmanek

LightningZ71

Platinum Member
Mar 10, 2017
2,507
3,190
136
It's possible that they are just choosing to disable them to increase yields. Hawk Point will broadly compete with Kraken on most metrics, but they need Kraken to have higher ASPs. The NPU will be the differentiator.

If they were really smart, they'd have done a Hawk Point part that, instead of having an NPU, had a 16MB LLC or just an infinity cache for the iGPU. That would have done well for them in handhelds in addition to the lower end of the laptop market.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,798
7,249
136
It's possible that they are just choosing to disable them to increase yields. Hawk Point will broadly compete with Kraken on most metrics, but they need Kraken to have higher ASPs. The NPU will be the differentiator.

If they were really smart, they'd have done a Hawk Point part that, instead of having an NPU, had a 16MB LLC or just an infinity cache for the iGPU. That would have done well for them in handhelds in addition to the lower end of the laptop market.

The purpose of the NPU is so that OEMs can claim they are selling more "AI PCs".
 

Joe NYC

Diamond Member
Jun 26, 2021
3,630
5,173
136
It's possible that they are just choosing to disable them to increase yields. Hawk Point will broadly compete with Kraken on most metrics, but they need Kraken to have higher ASPs. The NPU will be the differentiator.

If they were really smart, they'd have done a Hawk Point part that, instead of having an NPU, had a 16MB LLC or just an infinity cache for the iGPU. That would have done well for them in handhelds in addition to the lower end of the laptop market.

It would need a new die and new verification to add LLC, so more trouble than the benefit AMD will get out of these in terms of revenue.
 

StefanR5R

Elite Member
Dec 10, 2016
6,666
10,545
136
The purpose of the NPU is so that OEMs can claim they are selling more "AI PCs".
If AI PC is synonymous with Copilot+ PC, then Hawk Point's NPU doesn't cut it. Maybe they indeed fuse off the NPU in Ryzen 200s like they already did in some Ryzen 8000U, or maybe they leave it alone but just don't put "AI" in the name…?
 
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek
Jul 27, 2020
27,948
19,100
146
Maybe they indeed fuse off the NPU in Ryzen 200s like they already did in some Ryzen 8000U, or maybe they leave it alone but just don't put "AI" in the name…?
Or they are meant to be paired with cheap RDNA4 mobile GPUs that may offer far more TOPS than the 300 series HX NPU.
 
Jul 27, 2020
27,948
19,100
146
Yet only NPU TOPS matter for Microsoft's Copilot+ PC sticker, not GPU TOPS, from what I understood.
Jensen said he was working with M$ to enable at least Geforce AI support in Win11. Hopefully, Lisa has something similar going on with Microsoft AI team.
 

LightningZ71

Platinum Member
Mar 10, 2017
2,507
3,190
136
It would need a new die and new verification to add LLC, so more trouble than the benefit AMD will get out of these in terms of revenue.
Oh, I know it was wishful thinking. They would have had to have made that decision years ago and validated it in parallel with the NPU version.
 
Jul 27, 2020
27,948
19,100
146
Oh, I know it was wishful thinking. They would have had to have made that decision years ago and validated it in parallel with the NPU version.
Someone out there has an early engineering sample of that. Probably some lucky pasty white techie at a huge corporation in a basement somewhere...
 

LightningZ71

Platinum Member
Mar 10, 2017
2,507
3,190
136
I doubt that it even made it to a test fab. It probably existed in the modern day equivalent of a verilog simulator and got no farther. I don't doubt that there may exist a few test samples of Strix Point in it's original configuration however.
 

StefanR5R

Elite Member
Dec 10, 2016
6,666
10,545
136
Jensen said he was working with M$ to enable at least Geforce AI support in Win11. Hopefully, Lisa has something similar going on with Microsoft AI team.
That might happen once the Copilot+ PC sticker's strategic value is diminished. E.g. when Microsoft developed a next sticker.
 

Doug S

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2020
3,567
6,301
136
Yet only NPU TOPS matter for Microsoft's Copilot+ PC sticker, not GPU TOPS, from what I understood.

Because then plenty of existing PCs would qualify as AI PCs, diminishing the ability for Microsoft to push new PC sales (i.e. new Windows license sales)
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,798
7,249
136
Because then plenty of existing PCs would qualify as AI PCs, diminishing the ability for Microsoft to push new PC sales (i.e. new Windows license sales)

If MS was concerned about that, they could limit it to 50 Series laptops only.
 

MadRat

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
11,999
307
126
I never liked how a 'copyright protected' OS that advertises itself as fast and secure can be taken out of use simply by claiming the next OS is faster and more secure. The only way more complex systems are faster is by freezing features to handicap its use.