Discussion Speculation: Zen 4 (EPYC 4 "Genoa", Ryzen 7000, etc.)

Page 517 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vattila

Senior member
Oct 22, 2004
820
1,456
136
Except for the details about the improvements in the microarchitecture, we now know pretty well what to expect with Zen 3.

The leaked presentation by AMD Senior Manager Martin Hilgeman shows that EPYC 3 "Milan" will, as promised and expected, reuse the current platform (SP3), and the system architecture and packaging looks to be the same, with the same 9-die chiplet design and the same maximum core and thread-count (no SMT-4, contrary to rumour). The biggest change revealed so far is the enlargement of the compute complex from 4 cores to 8 cores, all sharing a larger L3 cache ("32+ MB", likely to double to 64 MB, I think).

Hilgeman's slides did also show that EPYC 4 "Genoa" is in the definition phase (or was at the time of the presentation in September, at least), and will come with a new platform (SP5), with new memory support (likely DDR5).

Untitled2.png


What else do you think we will see with Zen 4? PCI-Express 5 support? Increased core-count? 4-way SMT? New packaging (interposer, 2.5D, 3D)? Integrated memory on package (HBM)?

Vote in the poll and share your thoughts! :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: richardllewis_01

H433x0n

Golden Member
Mar 15, 2023
1,224
1,606
106

Destroying desktop Core i3 in ST performance. That's serious performance for the masses!

View attachment 87021
TIL a 1.9% advantage is destroying the competition.
 

Joe NYC

Diamond Member
Jun 26, 2021
3,634
5,174
136
Just realize that, at any time they wanted to, they could release a 5XXX+ line for AM4 based around N6 versions of the existing Zen3 CCDs with zero other changes and boost the MT performance of the AM4 platform by a notable amount, especially the 5900/5950. It wouldn't take a lot of investment either as N6 is supposed to be a "low effort" transition for existing N7 designs.

It is quite strange they did not.

I had a theory (which of course turned out to be wrong) that V-Cache would need new hardware stepping and that AMD would take the opportunity and move Zen 3 to N6.

Since it did not happen then, I don't think it is going to happen in the future...
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,695
12,370
136
Efficiency wise it is. A 7440u is 28W. a 13100f goes up to 72-75W according to Anandtech. That's pretty embarassing.

That is for multi-core loads, but either way, comparing mobile and desktop chips in efficiency isn't really a fair comparison. Granted, I still expect AMD mobile Zen 4 to have better efficiency compared to Intel 13th gen mobile, but you would need to compare them directly and under similar configurations to see by how much AMD leads in efficiency.
 

moinmoin

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2017
5,242
8,456
136
AMD screwed up bad by not supporting DDR4 on AM5.
I highly doubt it would have made a tangible difference. AM5 along Zen 4 was already delayed and due to the pandemic an earlier time likely wouldn't have worked out well either. And the farther from launch we go the more negligible the cost difference between DDR4 and 5 is.

In the end AM5 was always going to start out expensive, with DDR5 being just one part of the reason.
 
Jul 27, 2020
27,979
19,118
146

Breach seems like a very strong word. Could AMD be in serious legal trouble?
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,695
12,370
136

Breach seems like a very strong word. Could AMD be in serious legal trouble?

Doesn't look like it. GPD's contract would be with a distributor (their upstream supplier), not AMD directly. It may be that AMD didn't supply the expected amount (or in the expected time frame) to the distributor, but I highly doubt the distributor had a contract with AMD that required 'X' units by 'Y' date, that would be very unusual.

Edit: Most likely it's the same situation so many crowd sourced projects have. They promise project delivery by a certain date but can't actually procure the parts until they have the money from the funding drive. Once they get the money and go to procure the parts, the time to receive the parts is much longer than expected due to their own miscalculations or delivery dates have been pushed back due to supply/demand and then they start looking to pin the blame on someone else so the crowd funding backers don't pull their contributions. Just look at how Steam deck was handled where they had to do multiple rounds of deliveries that were being pushed out 6 months or more and they are a much bigger player than GPD who was working directly with AMD on a semi-custom chip. Over promise, under deliver, and blame it on someone else is the crowd sourcing way.
 
Last edited:

LightningZ71

Platinum Member
Mar 10, 2017
2,508
3,190
136
Zen 4 laptops are at least available now at very attractive prices. https://slickdeals.net/f/16994893-l...pro-7840u-64gb-lpddr5-1tb-ssd-win-11-pro-1059 with 7840u and 64GB RAM !!!! and 1 TB SSD with OLED screen as well for $1059. Just add 3 yrs of warranty and you are good.
On their website, the LOQ 16 AMD is available with a 7840hs and an nvidia 4060 8gb for ~$1079. My son has that combo and it performs broadly the same or better than his previous 6800hx/6800m laptop (warranty buy back due to motherboard failure).

Similar price, drastically better video performance on mains with similar performance on battery.
 

trivik12

Senior member
Jan 26, 2006
350
318
136
Slickdeals is just a deals finder site. The laptop in question is by Lenovo.
I have never bought anything in almost last 2 decades without seeing it on Slickdeals. Every deal is posted and you get counter opinions as well(folks who have had issues with the product or retailer selling it). Plus you get all the coupons that you can use to get best possible price and even tricks to make it cheaper(chatting with Samsung reps online helps you get coupons etc). But its specifically for US only.
 

eek2121

Diamond Member
Aug 2, 2005
3,408
5,046
136

StefanR5R

Elite Member
Dec 10, 2016
6,670
10,551
136
So, based on VideoCardz' supposed product images, a 96-core SKU at the top of the Threadripper 7000 line is going to be shipped in the same 58.5mm x 75.4mm package size of EPYC Naples/ Rome/ Milan/ Siena and of all of the previous Ryzen Threadripper series.
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,237
16,106
136
So, based on VideoCardz' supposed product images, a 96-core SKU at the top of the Threadripper 7000 line is going to be shipped in the same 58.5mm x 75.4mm package size of EPYC Naples/ Rome/ Milan/ Siena and of all of the previous Ryzen Threadripper series.
they say sTR5, not sure the dimensions of that.

But this confirms they can all use the same heatsink ??


Too bad nothing like that for Genoa
 

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
846
798
106
Am I right to assume there are going to have two different family of Threadripper series? 7000 series which considered HEDT and 7000 Pro series as workstation PC.

Last time AMD is making 3000 series for DIY market and 5000 Pro series for OEM workstation PC.


 
Last edited:

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,799
7,249
136
Am I right to assume there are going to have two different family of Threadripper series? 7000 series which considered HEDT and 7000 Pro series as workstation PC.

Last time AMD is making 3000 series as DIY market and 5000 Pro series as OEM workstation PC.

The 5000 series did get released to DIY eventually.
 

SteinFG

Senior member
Dec 29, 2021
732
868
106
Am I right to assume there are going to have two different family of Threadripper series? 7000 series which considered HEDT and 7000 Pro series as workstation PC.

Last time AMD is making 3000 series as DIY market and 5000 Pro series as OEM workstation PC.


Considering 2 different Box designs in the article, yes. I wonder what the differences are going to be. Regular is probably 4-channel / 64 PCIe / only UDIMM; And Pro is 8-channel / 64-128 PCIe
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Tigerick

moinmoin

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2017
5,242
8,456
136
That so far raises more questions than it gives answers. If the form factor is indeed the same as previous TR gens, is it then based on Siena/SP6 with 6 channels? But how do they manage 96 cores/12 CCDs then, wouldn't that actually require Zen 4c CCDs, and then 6 of them? And how would it then differentiate between Pro and non-Pro if the max of 6 channels is already less than the previous TR Pro gen?

Could well mean that now both TR and TR Pro are truly platforms of their own, distinct from the existing server platforms. That's unexpected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Kepler_L2