• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Speculation: Zen 4 (EPYC 4 "Genoa", Ryzen 7000, etc.)

Page 501 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vattila

Senior member
Except for the details about the improvements in the microarchitecture, we now know pretty well what to expect with Zen 3.

The leaked presentation by AMD Senior Manager Martin Hilgeman shows that EPYC 3 "Milan" will, as promised and expected, reuse the current platform (SP3), and the system architecture and packaging looks to be the same, with the same 9-die chiplet design and the same maximum core and thread-count (no SMT-4, contrary to rumour). The biggest change revealed so far is the enlargement of the compute complex from 4 cores to 8 cores, all sharing a larger L3 cache ("32+ MB", likely to double to 64 MB, I think).

Hilgeman's slides did also show that EPYC 4 "Genoa" is in the definition phase (or was at the time of the presentation in September, at least), and will come with a new platform (SP5), with new memory support (likely DDR5).

Untitled2.png


What else do you think we will see with Zen 4? PCI-Express 5 support? Increased core-count? 4-way SMT? New packaging (interposer, 2.5D, 3D)? Integrated memory on package (HBM)?

Vote in the poll and share your thoughts! 🙂
 
Last edited:

Appears that Dragon Range is coming to desktop. Guessing BGA for SFF and AIOs.
 

Appears that Dragon Range is coming to desktop. Guessing BGA for SFF and AIOs.
Huh? That doesn't make sense, Dragon Range doesn't come with a chipset, and the one almost miniPC I've seen with it also doesn't run a chipset
 

Appears that Dragon Range is coming to desktop. Guessing BGA for SFF and AIOs.
It look like this, and there s also an Intel version :

csm_20230531_161336_Custom_1ee90e60fa.jpg

 
Seems superfluous but hey why not? SFF/AiO builders prefer using mobile hardware.
It's been a hot minute since desktop hardware made sense due to heat output. the nuc13 uses full size hardware and that's a heathen if you account for the i9 desktop in there in the limited space.
 
It look like this, and there s also an Intel version :

csm_20230531_161336_Custom_1ee90e60fa.jpg

I saw their exhibits on youtube at computex this year. I want to get one of their bare bones models and put my own picked out hardware into it. it's a very impressive platform and mini computer. they're pushing out hardware combos that few others do. mini pc's need more love than they currently get.
 
I saw their exhibits on youtube at computex this year. I want to get one of their bare bones models and put my own picked out hardware into it. it's a very impressive platform and mini computer. they're pushing out hardware combos that few others do. mini pc's need more love than they currently get.

That s a very good idea from Minisforum but it would be better to use a socketed version rather than a BGA, AMD should release a 65W 7950 with optimised voltage curve like the 7945HX eventually, but even without optimisation it would be relevant and more appaling than the 230W one.

So far high powered PCs are of no interest for 80-90% of the users, most would be content with a 8C Zen 4, like the one below using a U version at 25W :


This one using a RMB would be great with a 7840HS :

 
It's been a hot minute since desktop hardware made sense due to heat output.

Nah there's the non-X AM5 parts which could easily slot in where OEMs are instead using Dragon Range. They all have a 65W TDP, and OEMs could easily cap total power usage if they so desired. BoM for Dragon Range is probably lower though.
 
Nah there's the non-X AM5 parts which could easily slot in where OEMs are instead using Dragon Range. They all have a 65W TDP, and OEMs could easily cap total power usage if they so desired. BoM for Dragon Range is probably lower though.
Who is selling those?
 
Details on Zen 4c and Bergamo:


Core area reduction was achieved through a combination of partition and layout changes, lower frequency target, and denser cells. The overall core area reduction was 35.4 percent.
 
Details on Zen 4c and Bergamo:


Core area reduction was achieved through a combination of partition and layout changes, lower frequency target, and denser cells. The overall core area reduction was 35.4 percent.
Just imagine what they could achieve with totally stacked L3$, especially if they also embraced newer variants of MRAM (like SOT MRAM) to replace SRAM for that level.
 
Details on Zen 4c and Bergamo:


Core area reduction was achieved through a combination of partition and layout changes, lower frequency target, and denser cells. The overall core area reduction was 35.4 percent.
…and half the L3 cache. I am curious as to the performance impact of that.

Imagine if AMD had dropped a chip with a binned 7950x CCD and one of these (8+16). Intel would have gotten absolutely creamed.
 
…and half the L3 cache. I am curious as to the performance impact of that.
Check out any mobile chip.

I recall reading some reviews a couple years ago (likely using Renoir and Matisse) that looked into this, but I can't find it anymore.
 
…and half the L3 cache. I am curious as to the performance impact of that.

Imagine if AMD had dropped a chip with a binned 7950x CCD and one of these (8+16). Intel would have gotten absolutely creamed.
That could happen if AMD felt like they wanted more MT in the desktop space. Maybe if Raptor lake refresh takes the crown AMD will come back with that.

Alternatively it could happen with Zen 5 as an Arrow Lake spoiler before Zen 6 hits.

AMD also have the option of pairing the 8c die with v-cache if they want as well to make it a true jack of all kind of CPU.
 
That could happen if AMD felt like they wanted more MT in the desktop space. Maybe if Raptor lake refresh takes the crown AMD will come back with that.

Alternatively it could happen with Zen 5 as an Arrow Lake spoiler before Zen 6 hits.
In desktop there would be no point in releasing new mid gen processors like they did with the lacklustre xt's which @DrMrLordX complained about non stop. the timelines for arrow lake and zen 5 appear closer but it relies on amd having enough supply, a good product, being out faster than anticipated and affordable. Z890 chipsets for arrow lake will have feature parity with am5.

the catch here is the parity. will intel or amd have pcie6 available? I say both. and before you question it yes it was finalized over a year ago and is due to be produced on mainboards. the pcie3 to pcie4 time period was a holdover for numerous amendments that delayed its release. it means little for graphics cards and storage seeing the lackluster pcie5 nvme's on the market, but it's the lane count that matters. being able to run multiple drives then in the future of pcie4 or pcie5 without incurring lane shortages whilst using a high end gpu is the end game., or any pcie card or device like a multi drive card or two. Zen 5 and zen 5 3d should be the end game for am5 because amd will be spending time honing am6 which will likely brandish then new ddr6 alongside intel. we'll see a repeat of high initial prices and then bottoming out. although this may be minimized if production ramps up and the ai bullshit craze is still around.
 
In desktop there would be no point in releasing new mid gen processors like they did with the lacklustre xt's which @DrMrLordX complained about non stop. the timelines for arrow lake and zen 5 appear closer but it relies on amd having enough supply, a good product, being out faster than anticipated and affordable. Z890 chipsets for arrow lake will have feature parity with am5.

the catch here is the parity. will intel or amd have pcie6 available? I say both. and before you question it yes it was finalized over a year ago and is due to be produced on mainboards. the pcie3 to pcie4 time period was a holdover for numerous amendments that delayed its release. it means little for graphics cards and storage seeing the lackluster pcie5 nvme's on the market, but it's the lane count that matters. being able to run multiple drives then in the future of pcie4 or pcie5 without incurring lane shortages whilst using a high end gpu is the end game., or any pcie card or device like a multi drive card or two. Zen 5 and zen 5 3d should be the end game for am5 because amd will be spending time honing am6 which will likely brandish then new ddr6 alongside intel. we'll see a repeat of high initial prices and then bottoming out. although this may be minimized if production ramps up and the ai bullshit craze is still around.

AMD have the options to take the outright performance crown. If Zen5 is a year+ away and Raptor lake starts to eat their lunch a 24c Zen4 3d part is entirely doable should AMD choose.
 
AMD have the options to take the outright performance crown. If Zen5 is a year+ away and Raptor lake starts to eat their lunch a 24c Zen4 3d part is entirely doable should AMD choose.
AMD ALREADY has the outright performance crown. Gaming, laptop, server, HEDT, and the closest Intel gets is desktop space, and that is arguably the best case scenario for Intel, a tie.
 
Details on Zen 4c and Bergamo:


Core area reduction was achieved through a combination of partition and layout changes, lower frequency target, and denser cells. The overall core area reduction was 35.4 percent.
Very impressive shrink. Wonder what clocks would look like though.
 
Back
Top