Good problem solved stop whining about the A320
Who whinning? I said A520 news settle the matter of A320, as many belived it would not be replaced because it was worthless.
Good problem solved stop whining about the A320
Yes it does, the A320 is now certified poop.
Who whinning? I said A520 news settle the matter of A320, as many belived it would not be replaced because it was worthless.
At least it's certified. Can you say that? I can't!
I work in real estate, everything can be certified. A Proctologist or a Doctor who performs colonoscopies or even a sewerage worker could certify a poop.
The rumor of the X590 is a bit strange because if you are in that price bracket wouldn't it make more sense to buy a threadripper board.
Dammit, could we please stop having endless debates about motherboards in this CPU thread!!!
Well, for some IO applications, 8 core is enough. The way Rome is made, this makes sense to cover all parts of the market. The above may cover all server applications today, and only requires a IO chiplet, and an 8 core chiplet, and just put them together like legos to get the desired CPU.
Possible Rome spec list. Oddly, they are doing all the way down to 8 core (at 155 and 120 W no less). Also no 250 W parts, only 225 and 200 for 64 cores.
Possible Rome spec list. Oddly, they are doing all the way down to 8 core (at 155 and 120 W no less). Also no 250 W parts, only 225 and 200 for 64 cores.
Intel makes cpus specialized for this too, the very highest clocking low-core-count Xeons are actually auctioned, with no public price. The actual sale prices on those are much higher than the list price of the highest core count xeon.
Oddly, they are doing all the way down to 8 core (at 155 and 120 W no less)
Those are more for HFT than anything else. The high licensing cost per core crowd would still want more than 8 cores I would think, if only for density reasons.
I guess those will contain 4 chiplets at most (1 activated core per CCX).Oddly, they are doing all the way down to 8 core (at 155 and 120 W no less).
Definitely.I suspect the high wattage is due to the bigger IO die compared to desktop IO die.
No, they really wouldn't. If the software costs you $200,000 a year if you run it on an 8-core, or $800,000 if you run it on a 32-core, you don't give a damn about density. (No, you usually cannot just decide to only use some of the cores for a given software. For instance, Oracle bills you for every core that your code could plausibly run on in your setup.)
And the highest clocking core in each CCX enabled. Should be the fastest clocked CPUs on sale.I guess those will contain 4 chiplets at most (1 activated core per CCX).
Definitely.
EPYC ROME 8-CORE 7252P 3.2GHZ/SKT SP3 32MB CACHE 120W - P/N: 100-000000081 (1 chiplet)EPYC ROME 8-CORE 7252 3.2GHZ/SKT SP3 64MB CACHE 120W - P/N: 100-000000080 (2 chiplet)EPYC ROME 8-CORE 7262 3.4GHZ/SKT SP3 64MB CACHE 155W - P/N: 100-000000041 (2 chiplet)EPYC ROME 12-CORE 7272 3.2GHZ/SKT SP3 64MB CACHE 120W - P/N: 100-000000079 (2 chiplet)EPYC ROME 16-CORE 7282 3.2GHZ/SKT SP3 64MB CACHE 120W - P/N: 100-000000078 (2 chiplet)EPYC ROME 16-CORE 7302 3.3GHZ/SKT SP3 128MB CACHE 155W - P/N: 100-000000043 (4 chiplet)EPYC ROME 16-CORE 7302P 3.3GHZ/SKT SP3 128MB CACHE 155W - P/N: 100-000000049 (4 chiplet)EPYC ROME 24-CORE 7352 3.2GHZ/SKT SP3 128MB CACHE 155W - P/N: 100-000000077 (4 chiplet)EPYC ROME 24-CORE 7402 3.35GHZ/SKT SP3 128MB CACHE 180W - P/N: 100-000000046 (4 chiplet)EPYC ROME 24-CORE 7402P 3.35GHZ/SKT SP3 128MB CACHE 180W - P/N: 100-000000048 (4 chiplet)EPYC ROME 32-CORE 7452 3.35GHZ/SKT SP3 128MB CACHE 155W - P/N: 100-000000057 (4 chiplet)EPYC ROME 32-CORE 7502P 3.35GHZ/SKT SP3 128MB CACHE 180W - P/N: 100-000000045 (4 chiplet)EPYC ROME 32-CORE 7502 3.35GHZ/SKT SP3 128MB CACHE 180W - P/N: 100-000000054 (4 chiplet)EPYC ROME 32-CORE 7542 3.4GHZ/SKT SP3 128MB CACHE 225W - P/N: 100-000000075 (4 chiplet)EPYC ROME 48-CORE 7552 3.35GHZ/SKT SP3 192MB CACHE 200W - P/N: 100-000000076 (6 chiplet)EPYC ROME 48-CORE 7642 3.4GHZ/SKT SP3 192MB CACHE 225W - P/N: 100-000000074 (6 chiplet)EPYC ROME 64-CORE 7702 3.35GHZ/SKT SP3 256MB CACHE 200W - P/N: 100-000000038 (8 chiplet)EPYC ROME 64-CORE 7702P 3.35GHZ/SKT SP3 256MB CACHE 200W - P/N: 100-000000047 (8 chiplet)EPYC ROME 64-CORE 7742 3.4GHZ/SKT SP3 256MB CACHE 225W - P/N: 100-000000053 (8 chiplet)
and 400 mhz clocked higher
that 225 watt 7742, is lower tdp than my 32 core 2990wx, and twice the cores and 400 mhz clocked higher ! Impressive !
Thats higher than my boost clocks, at twice the cores and less TDP ! Oh, they knocked it out of the park OK.......Those speeds, if true, have to be boost clocks, not base.