Special Counsel Mueller has submitted his report to Attorney General Barr

Page 28 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
24,817
9,027
136
LOL. You can't win the arguments so resort to absurd personal attacks.

If the OIG found that key evidence regarding Strzok was destroyed, your argument that there was no evidence found against him is significantly less convincing.

It's not "evidence"...it's just records. Apparently when devices are reused/reissued to new employees, not all the records from old employees were kept. FBI had a different procedure for retaining records than SCO.

Again, how does the fact that records were destroyed after employees were terminated re reflect poorly on Strzok???
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,055
48,055
136
LOL. You can't win the arguments so resort to absurd personal attacks.

Huh? I already won the argument, now I'm just dunking on you.

If the OIG found that key evidence regarding Strzok was destroyed, your argument that there was no evidence found against him is significantly less convincing.

It also said this:

Additionally, the contractor informed the OIG that it was unlikely that Strzok and Page attempted to circumvent the FBI's text message collection capabilities, and the OJG found no evidence that they did

The FBI accepts the fact that not all texts between Ms. Page and Mr. Strozk were collected by the FBl's text collection tool but appreciates and agrees with the OIG's conclusion and explanation that the content of text messages exchanged between Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page did not appear to be a factor in their collection, or lack thereof. Further, the OIG did not find that the gaps in collection were intentional on the part of the FBI or any FBI personnel.

So no evidence of any misconduct by Strzok and no evidence of any attempt to hide evidence.

Why do you keep citing sources that destroy your argument? Hahaha.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,055
48,055
136
Report is over 300 pages long. So much for the notion that there is literally no evidence of collusion, as opposed to what Mueller deems insufficient evidence for prosecution. What are the odds you open this report and it says, under the heading collusion, "nothing. nope. no evidence of collusion." Then goes on to analyze the evidence for obstruction in the all the remaining space. Because that is how Barr's summary reads.

I think what we're going to see in the report is extensive discussion of the relationship between Trump, his campaign, and the Russians, and an explanation for why Mueller doesn't think he can prove an illegal transaction beyond reasonable doubt. Said discussion will likely contain numerous unflattering observations about Trump's behavior. Trump not wanting anyone to see this is why the report's release is delayed. They're trying to figure out how to justify not showing us what Trump doesn't want us to see.

Yes, as they fight against releasing the report we need to keep asking why they are trying so hard to keep something hidden which totally exonerates Trump.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
lol. Zerohedge.

The alt-right & Russian trolls have whipped themselves up into a Banzai charge, huh?

Never mind that Strzok was bumped out of the Special Counsel investigation early on, less than two months after he became part of it. Never mind the ongoing obfuscation & obstruction. Never mind that an innocent man doesn't surround himself with liars, cheats, thieves & charlatans the way Trump has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: edblor
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Stzork was a cop with an agenda, he ended up being (properly) fired for it. The man despised Trump, and promised his mistress that Trump would never be elected. This is the same guy and mistress that discussed going easy on Hillary when he was investigating her.

What exactly did the guy do to protect Clinton and take down Trump. Got some specifics for us?

btw, your slip is showing again.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,210
12,854
136

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
6,461
7,636
136
  • Like
Reactions: esquared

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
37,767
18,045
146
Devin Nunes calls for criminal investigations of the DOJ and FBI.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/devin-...-investigation

Rand Paul calls for investigation of Barack Obama.
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...stigate-obama?

Rand Paul also says John Brennan attempted a coup against Individual 1
https://www.newsweek.com/rand-paul-s...rennan-1378437

Lol!...It's a case of accusing your opponent of what you yourself are doing....

So many investigations, what was it about these things costing so much money that conservatives we're raving about?
 
  • Like
Reactions: esquared

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Devin Nunes calls for criminal investigations of the DOJ and FBI.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/devin-...-investigation

Rand Paul calls for investigation of Barack Obama.
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...stigate-obama?

Rand Paul also says John Brennan attempted a coup against Individual 1
https://www.newsweek.com/rand-paul-s...rennan-1378437

Lol!...It's a case of accusing your opponent of what you yourself are doing....

They're really revving up up the conspiracy theory spin machine, huh? Oh, Baby!

Mueller's report must be very bad for Trump Co. Very bad.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,647
5,220
136
Devin Nunes calls for criminal investigations of the DOJ and FBI.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/devin-...-investigation

Rand Paul calls for investigation of Barack Obama.
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...stigate-obama?

Rand Paul also says John Brennan attempted a coup against Individual 1
https://www.newsweek.com/rand-paul-s...rennan-1378437

Lol!...It's a case of accusing your opponent of what you yourself are doing....

So they are saying it's just fine if we investigate Trump and his kids well after he's out of office.

Cool. I'll take that.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,647
5,220
136
Super lolz@Barr

https://www.businessinsider.com/barr-send-mueller-report-white-house-executive-privilege-legal-analysis-2019-3

"Attorney General William Barr said this week that he will send the special counsel Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation to the White House before the public sees it so they can redact privileged information."

- Hahahahahahahah hahahahahahaahahahahahahah haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

"Priviledged"?

What, like all the parts that describe illegal, immoral or corrupt behavior?

Wasn't that what the 4pg Barr was for?

Or are we going to get a reprint of that plus 30pgs of contextless prepositions and pronouns?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Super lolz@Barr

https://www.businessinsider.com/barr-send-mueller-report-white-house-executive-privilege-legal-analysis-2019-3

"Attorney General William Barr said this week that he will send the special counsel Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation to the White House before the public sees it so they can redact privileged information."

- Hahahahahahahah hahahahahahaahahahahahahah haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

Trump waived any legitimate claim to executive privilege when he ordered those people to testify to the Special Counsel.
 

outriding

Diamond Member
Feb 20, 2002
3,109
2,177
136

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,493
3,159
136
People might not realize that William Barr was also around during the Germany Nazi era.
And like with republicans and Donald Trump, the Nazis also had their special counsel look into Hitler and the camps.
And again it was a very young William Barr that first received that nazi special counsel report.
And then William Barr wrote his first of many future four page summaries.
The summary was as follows....

Camps are not harmful to inhabitants.
Camp showers could be a little better designed considering a mixup between plumbing connections, gas connections vs water.
There was no evidence of Hitler collusion as the 300 page report plainly states.
Adolf loved his girl friend and his dogs. Nothing fishy beyond that.
Hitler did not collude against any race, persons, or place of origin.
Hitler spent the majority of his time taking pottery classes, learning to create macro may, and playing bingo with staff.
Then one day while playing in his bunker with a gun, a pack of matches, and a can of gasoline an unforeseen accident occurred.
And that sums it up.
Signed.
William Barr

So you see, it is plainly obvious that William Barr is fair and balanced.
We should trust him. :rolleyes:
 

outriding

Diamond Member
Feb 20, 2002
3,109
2,177
136
Devin Nunes calls for criminal investigations of the DOJ and FBI.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/devin-...-investigation

Rand Paul calls for investigation of Barack Obama.
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...stigate-obama?

Rand Paul also says John Brennan attempted a coup against Individual 1
https://www.newsweek.com/rand-paul-s...rennan-1378437

Lol!...It's a case of accusing your opponent of what you yourself are doing....

To be serious .. Obama did request to investigate Russian interference, but wanted bipartisan support but Mitch denied it.

Why doesnt call for an investigation into Mitch.. (i know the answer to that)


https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/23/mitch-mcconnell-russia-obama-joe-biden-359531
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bitek and cytg111

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
13,050
7,978
136

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
23,437
10,330
136
Wow , so we live in a modern age of media. Anybody found a complete transcript of Adam Schiff's response to the Republican letter demanding his resignation? I've only partial, the rest video. His words are what our side of the argument is. That speech was historical. My new hero.

Adam Schiff shames the shameless All of it with this link.

Nunes seems a little squirmy.
 
Last edited: