UNCjigga
Lifer
- Dec 12, 2000
- 24,817
- 9,027
- 136
LOL. You can't win the arguments so resort to absurd personal attacks.
If the OIG found that key evidence regarding Strzok was destroyed, your argument that there was no evidence found against him is significantly less convincing.
It's not "evidence"...it's just records. Apparently when devices are reused/reissued to new employees, not all the records from old employees were kept. FBI had a different procedure for retaining records than SCO.
Again, how does the fact that records were destroyed after employees were terminated re reflect poorly on Strzok???