Anybody taking bets there was no proof of collusion by Trump?
As much as I believe Trump conspired or engaged in tit-for-tat, sufficient evidence is a 50-50 proposition at this point.
There's a lot of Mueller's findings we don't yet know. The size of the iceberg is proportional to the quantity of tips revealed. There are many indictments, convictions and plea-bargains already. Some of the pundits argue logically that too much already points to Trump. Some argue there may be insufficient evidence. Sufficient evidence has to overwhelm the bias protecting the innocent, even a presidential Innocent.
There's nothing left to do but wait. And then there's nothing left to do but continue to wait for the House investigating committees. To borrow from Pacino's Col. Frank Slade: "They're jus' gettin' warmed up!"
What bothers me more than anything at this moment is that Trump and his Base are asserting that career law enforcement should have no right to enforce the law because "they weren't elected". These people have contempt for elections. They relish not winning the popular vote, and they plan on doing it again without the popular vote. And they believe that their win is our loss, which we somehow deserve.
So that all conforms with their idea that reality is what the winners want it to be, and that the Law is subordinate to the power in charge.