South Africa to amend constitution to allow land expropriation

UglyCasanova

Lifer
Mar 25, 2001
19,275
1,361
126
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-africa-45026931

South Africa will push ahead with plans to amend the constitution to allow land expropriation without compensation, its president says.

In a recorded address, President Cyril Ramaphosa said the ruling ANC will "finalise a proposed amendment" allowing the move.

He said the reform was "of critical importance" to the economy.

Recent months have seen growing anger about the slow pace of land reform in South Africa.

The country's white minority is believed to have a disproportionate hold over land, with a few thousand white commercial farmers possessing the most fertile lands.

However, critics fear expropriation could lead to land grabs, as happened in neighbouring Zimbabwe.


I don’t see this ending well. It didn’t with Zimbabwe and I don’t see how this would be any different. I feel little sympathy for the large plantation owners in SA but this could simply wreck the farms.

Lighter note, here’s the president firing an AK47 in the air in a crowded stadium. Brilliant.

https://mobile.twitter.com/JeanKriek/status/1024402894832001024
 

KMFJD

Lifer
Aug 11, 2005
31,701
49,810
136
if they are going to do that they also have to expropriate the zulu communal lands
 

dawp

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
11,347
2,709
136
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-africa-45026931

South Africa will push ahead with plans to amend the constitution to allow land expropriation without compensation, its president says.

In a recorded address, President Cyril Ramaphosa said the ruling ANC will "finalise a proposed amendment" allowing the move.

He said the reform was "of critical importance" to the economy.

Recent months have seen growing anger about the slow pace of land reform in South Africa.

The country's white minority is believed to have a disproportionate hold over land, with a few thousand white commercial farmers possessing the most fertile lands.

However, critics fear expropriation could lead to land grabs, as happened in neighbouring Zimbabwe.


I don’t see this ending well. It didn’t with Zimbabwe and I don’t see how this would be any different. I feel little sympathy for the large plantation owners in SA but this could simply wreck the farms.

Lighter note, here’s the president firing an AK47 in the air in a crowded stadium. Brilliant.

https://mobile.twitter.com/JeanKriek/status/1024402894832001024
who do you think occupied the land before europeans showed up and grabbed it.?
 
Nov 8, 2012
20,842
4,785
146
Heh, I can already see it now... revolt against the land owners (whether right or wrong, doesn't really matter to this point). Burn the plantation down.... no more food.

Takes the term "don't bite the hand that feeds you" to a whole new level.
 

UglyCasanova

Lifer
Mar 25, 2001
19,275
1,361
126
Heh, I can already see it now... revolt against the land owners (whether right or wrong, doesn't really matter to this point). Burn the plantation down.... no more food.

Takes the term "don't bite the hand that feeds you" to a whole new level.


Which is kinda what happened in Zimbabwe. They started begging the white former landowners to come back because they lacked the expertise to run it. I get the moral justification even if I disagree with how it’s implemented, but just because something feels good short term doesn’t mean you won’t regret it later.
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
Which is kinda what happened in Zimbabwe. They started begging the white former landowners to come back because they lacked the expertise to run it. I get the moral justification even if I disagree with how it’s implemented, but just because something feels good short term doesn’t mean you won’t regret it later.

The story of pegging.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,254
136
While I can understand the moral justification, this just seems like a really bad idea. It would be much better to just slowly raise the taxes on them until they had to sell off pieces.

The same justification could be used in Hawaii, most of the United States, Mexico and South America. At some point, you sort of need to accept that what happened in the past happened. You should use the current injustices to justify change, not things that happened generations ago.
 
Dec 10, 2005
27,513
11,859
136
The same justification could be used in Hawaii, most of the United States, Mexico and South America. At some point, you sort of need to accept that what happened in the past happened. You should use the current injustices to justify change, not things that happened generations ago.
I think the big issue that tends to get glossed over a lot is that many of the current injustices have their roots firmly in the injustices of the past. It's hard to address the injustices of the present while telling the people who have historically had injustices perpetrated against them to get over the past.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,254
136
I think the big issue that tends to get glossed over a lot is that many of the current injustices have their roots firmly in the injustices of the past. It's hard to address the injustices of the present while telling the people who have historically had injustices perpetrated against them to get over the past.
Well what I mean is saying "These people stole our land 200 years ago, so now we are going to steal it back" seems like it would likely cause a lot of issues. I think it would be better to say "There is too much concentration of valuable farm land in the hands of the few. We are going to increase taxes on land owners that own over x km^2 of land." Or force a breakup of the land that is sold at auction.

I don't mean people should ignore the past, or how things became the way they are, but I don't think directly using injustices from the distant past to justify actions today is good policy.
 

KMFJD

Lifer
Aug 11, 2005
31,701
49,810
136
They've already tried to give farmland to people in SA, all it lead to was the people selling that land back to the farmers because they don't know what they are doing and the government is too incompetent to help them like they promised, this is just going to lead to more power and money in the hands of the elites...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Exterous

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Yaknow, the world's biggest problem with post-colonialism is how to give back stolen land 100+ years after the fact.
The OP's biggest problem with it is his belief that black people are inferior.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,100
29,246
136
Taking land without appropriate compensation is just wrong. However this is yet another thread where the OP is showing his concern for white people while ignoring issues impacting minorities in the US.

Or put another way:

The OP is more concerned about white people halfway around the world than with the ability of minorities to vote in Georgia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,824
1,583
136
Taking land without appropriate compensation is just wrong. However this is yet another thread where the OP is showing his concern for white people while ignoring issues impacting minorities in the US.

Or put another way:

The OP is more concerned about white people halfway around the world than with the ability of minorities to vote in Georgia.

I don't believe the current white land owners paid appropriate compensation when they took the land... just saying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brainonska511

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,100
29,246
136
You people can be vile but this is ridiculous. Fvck you for even insinuating, personally I think that should be banworthy.

You post 4 kinds of threads:

1. White people allegedly being taken advantage of in some way
2. concerns about LGBT people
3. Christianity allegedly being taken advantage of in some way
4. concerns when women don't put with men's bull shit any longer

From this we can only conclude that you favor whites over others, have a problem with the LGBT community, believe in Christian superiority, and want women back in the kitchen. So if this isn't the real you we have no way of knowing that from what you post here.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,100
29,246
136
I don't believe the current white land owners paid appropriate compensation when they took the land... just saying.

I would agree with that. But what made the transition from minority to majority rule possible without cataclysmic violence was assurances that whites wouldn't have their property taken from them wholesale.

I also have no faith in the current government to be able to ensure the success of those they give the land to or even to do it fairly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vic

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
You people can be vile but this is ridiculous. Fvck you for even insinuating, personally I think that should be banworthy.
Yeah, it's just coincidental that their 'lack of expertise' is tied to their skin color, right?
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136