Some clarification on defective conservative thinking:

[xj0hnx]

That dogs legs work just fine.
He is actually just wiping his ass on your carpet.
The passerbys don't even see him when they say that

Nope, not my carpet, and sorry Moonie, there's no mirrors here, it's all you. Your self hate, and hate for others is overwhelming you senses, you should take a break.

 

[Moonbeam]

😀 Burn!


Moonbeam isn't really a liberal, he's just, well, Moonbeam. Unique, and therefore valuable.

I don't think I am unique. I think I am more like original, what you would be too if you didn't believe in anything. I am what was left after everything I wasn't died.

Now please don't tell me that makes you want to compete. Anything you see in me you want to compete with is yourself. I went down long ago in total defeat. My defeat was so complete I was even de feeted and have never again had anything on which to stand. LunarRay even once told me I lack understanding."

 

[mect]

Everyone's insane but me.

 

[Moonbeam]

Nope, not my carpet, and sorry Moonie, there's no mirrors here, it's all you. Your self hate, and hate for others is overwhelming you senses, you should take a break.

Your reflections on the lack of a mirror here are hilarious. But I don't expect you will see the joke. And didn't I just say that your ego need to think I'm overwhelmed by something is just your personal effort to inflate your own ego. But then I am already rather sure you are someone well known as impossible to reach, an exponent, as it were, of the conservative brain defect.

 

[Moonbeam]

Everyone's insane but me.

Typical black and white conservative thinking.

 

[mect]

Typical black and white conservative thinking.

Typical black and white Moonbeam thinking.

 

[Moonbeam]

But I have to give the conservative mindset one thing, they sure talk a good fantasy, but when it comes to actual results, the conservative mindset never delivers the bacon.

Just don't get too caught up in trying to convince them of this. These are not rational beings but programmed thingi.

 

[Moonbeam]

Typical black and white Moonbeam thinking.

See? Black and white thinking is typical of conservatives. So in your black and white way you labeled me a black and white thinker. It is this labeling of others that makes you a conservative. I just pointed it out what you did and, trapped as you are with two options, you did it again.

My job is to show liberals that you can't think strait, and for your proof I thank you.

 

[BoberFett]

Such hatred of anyone who doesn't think like you. Typical "liberal."

 

[xj0hnx]

Your reflections on the lack of a mirror here are hilarious. But I don't expect you will see the joke. And didn't I just say that your ego need to think I'm overwhelmed by something is just your personal effort to inflate your own ego. But then I am already rather sure you are someone well known as impossible to reach, an exponent, as it were, of the conservative brain defect.

Moonie, there's no "mirror", "ego", or anything else, it's you, alone wallowing in your hatred of self, and others. You pretend to be some elevated, insightful being, but you're really just another pretentious, condescending, pseudo-intellectual wanna-be, I've seen your type many times, nothing new, or ground breaking going on here.

 

[Iron Wolf]

Just don't get too caught up in trying to convince them of this. These are not rational beings but programmed thingi.

Dehumanization of your enemies is the typical first step of those who seek genocide and the total destruction of their opposition.

I will admit that there are nutcases on the conservative side (*cough* Ann Coulter *cough*), but your liberal version of insanity takes the cake, Moonbeam. I'm not sure who's worse, you or TexasHiker.

 

[mect]

See? Black and white thinking is typical of conservatives. So in your black and white way you labeled me a black and white thinker. It is this labeling of others that makes you a conservative. I just pointed it out what you did and, trapped as you are with two options, you did it again.

My job is to show liberals that you can't think strait, and for your proof I thank you.

Ah, but I had a trap waiting to trap you when you attempted to trap me in your trap, as you have now shown twice that you are only capable of black and white thinking, making you a conservative who is doubly trapped in both my trap as well as your own.

 

[werepossum]

See? Black and white thinking is typical of conservatives. So in your black and white way you labeled me a black and white thinker. It is this labeling of others that makes you a conservative. I just pointed it out what you did and, trapped as you are with two options, you did it again.

My job is to show liberals that you can't think strait, and for your proof I thank you.

I'm pretty conservative and I have no problem thinking of narrow but navigable channels of water . . . <VBEG>

 

[Moonbeam]

Dehumanization of your enemies is the typical first step of those who seek genocide and the total destruction of their opposition.

I will admit that there are nutcases on the conservative side (*cough* Ann Coulter *cough*), but your liberal version of insanity takes the cake, Moonbeam. I'm not sure who's worse, you or TexasHiker.

Perhaps as a liberal you won't be too programmed to see the fallacy of your thinking here.

If I point to a robot and say it is a robot, am I dehumanizing it? If I point to a person who is a robot via programming am I dehumanizing it? In short, if somebody has been dehumanized by being programmed, am I dehumanizing them by pointing it out? Your problem may be that you don't see that conservatives are programmed and that calling a spade a spade isn't polite. The truth doesn't dehumanize when the truth is that some folk aren't actually human. I am not calling conservatives robots. They beat me to it but I have said over and over again, you probably also don't read, that it's not their fault.

And note your own dehumanization without any amelioration or truth. There are no nutcase conservatives, only folk who were badly damaged as children. They had to become nutcases, as you call them, to survive. Try to be nicer. Call them programmed and not nut cases OK?

 

[Moonbeam]

I'm pretty conservative and I have no problem thinking of narrow but navigable channels of water . . . <VBEG>

Don't ever do that again. I can't stand being caught in a strait. It really hurts my ego.

 

[Moonbeam]

Ah, but I had a trap waiting to trap you when you attempted to trap me in your trap, as you have now shown twice that you are only capable of black and white thinking, making you a conservative who is doubly trapped in both my trap as well as your own.

You caught a snark. Nice

 

[dmcowen674]

Some clarification on defective conservative thinking:

As I explained in my first recent thread on the defects of the conservative brain

Do you think there is any way to re-rehabilitate them or educate them or are they a lost cause?

Do you think we can get rid of them somehow?

Not like 1930's Germany but more like exile like how Australia was populated. Where can we send them or they would want to go?

Time is running out, they have just about destroyed the country to the point of no return

 

[LunarRay]

This is really an interesting thread.

Moonbeam provides a thesis where Conservatives essentially are challenged to respond in order to provide evidence that what Moonbeam suggests is true as well as obvious. And quite a few do.
Amazingly even a few Liberals show that they too are afflicted by the need to defend their well hidden sub-conscious motivator.

Some even suspect a trap and march right on into it and when it is set off they simply limp on wondering perhaps if the trap dangled from their leg all along.

My question is to do with the feeling folks have regarding either conservative or liberal thinking. Do folks agree with all the rhetoric uttered or agenda pushed by their political side or some of it and allow what they feel is not so right to tag along?

Would folks apply all the doctrine their political side issues at home and to their family or is it reserved for others while some parts may be employed at home. IOW, the control of other folks regardless of those folks wants is done for their benefit or for the notion of denying others their wants? It seems to me that how your neighbor lives his life has little impact on yours.

I wonder how many Conservative folks who've lost their job, live on food stamps or welfare or on the street will vote liberal or maintain their former allegiance?
Edit: maybe 'former' is not appropriate... presumes a change... maybe not...

 

[LunarRay]

Just don't get too caught up in trying to convince them of this. These are not rational beings but programmed thingi.

As an INFJ I look at the ESTJ Top Sergeants and ENTJ Leaders as having an agenda that forces them to not only maintain their equilibrium but also to force others to comply with their wants and needs but to also climb the ladder up to their status and thus provide justification for their actions.... 'Up the ladder' to the assassin is not a desired reality. The assassin really wants no one near their status... it is their very existence at stake when others dare close in... who'd they control if there were no braves for their chief needs.

We are all programmed by our 'who we are' it seems... we seem to always do what our inner little needy bug demands...

 

[Moonbeam]

This is really an interesting thread.

Moonbeam provides a thesis where Conservatives essentially are challenged to respond in order to provide evidence that what Moonbeam suggests is true as well as obvious. And quite a few do.
Amazingly even a few Liberals show that they too are afflicted by the need to defend their well hidden sub-conscious motivator.

Some even suspect a trap and march right on into it and when it is set off they simply limp on wondering perhaps if the trap dangled from their leg all along.

My question is to do with the feeling folks have regarding either conservative or liberal thinking. Do folks agree with all the rhetoric uttered or agenda pushed by their political side or some of it and allow what they feel is not so right to tag along?

Would folks apply all the doctrine their political side issues at home and to their family or is it reserved for others while some parts may be employed at home. IOW, the control of other folks regardless of those folks wants is done for their benefit or for the notion of denying others their wants? It seems to me that how your neighbor lives his life has little impact on yours.

I wonder how many Conservative folks who've lost their job, live on food stamps or welfare or on the street will vote liberal or maintain their former allegiance?
Edit: maybe 'former' is not appropriate... presumes a change... maybe not...

This, I would say, is worthy of its own thread. All I wanted to do was clarify for liberals why then needn't bust a gut over the total absurdity of right winged thinking. The victims have a disease and its not their fault. They are simply unable to think any other way than they do regardless of how absurd they look to others. They can neither see their motivators or the fact that they have them.

 

[xj0hnx]

I wonder how many Conservative folks who've lost their job, live on food stamps or welfare or on the street will vote liberal or maintain their former allegiance?

I guess that would depend on if it were viewed as a hand up, or a hand out.

 

[Moonbeam]

As an INFJ I look at the ESTJ Top Sergeants and ENTJ Leaders as having an agenda that forces them to not only maintain their equilibrium but also to force others to comply with their wants and needs but to also climb the ladder up to their status and thus provide justification for their actions.... 'Up the ladder' to the assassin is not a desired reality. The assassin really wants no one near their status... it is their very existence at stake when others dare close in... who'd they control if there were no braves for their chief needs.

We are all programmed by our 'who we are' it seems... we seem to always do what our inner little needy bug demands...

It should, of course, knowing you as I do, be of no surprose to me that this subject would come up, because I have for days now been wondering how an INFJ would view jury nullification compared to an INFP. hehehehehe

 

[Rainsford]

I wonder why other libs are not trying to silence Moon? He makes them all look like lunatics with his anti-conservative idotic posts. I would expect them to be in there disavowing his tantrums and claiming he is a fringe element and does not reflect their views.

Well, for one thing, you complained about a lack of response less than an hour after Moonbeam made this thread. Not everyone camps out here waiting to make sure cybrsage has accurate information 😛

Also, I don't get the whole concept of "disavowing" people as you suggest. I'm a liberal, but I think my own thoughts and have my own political views. I don't feel compelled to clarify that not every liberal speaks for me, because I assume you're not an idiot and that this should be obvious. If this point is confusing, then I'm not sure what comment I could possibly make that would help you out.

 

[LunarRay]

I guess that would depend on if it were viewed as a hand up, or a hand out.

I can't help but think it would be viewed as survival regardless of a former thought.

 

[Moonbeam]

I guess that would depend on if it were viewed as a hand up, or a hand out.

Nonononono The issue is not how it would be view as if the viewer had some meter of truth to measure by, but how the meter of measure would change depending on the position. The conservative thinker is solely preoccupied by whether it's his ox that gets gored. That is how it comes to pass that a conservative can sometimes cease to hate fagots when his favorite girl turns out to be one. Conservatives are beset by fears of evil and that can change when they accidental fall in love with the devil.