• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Some additional information about the Las Vegas shooter

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,228
15,639
136
You know, I like to sprinkle my paranoia with a little bit of baseline reality ... I feel it keeps me grounded.
 

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
See, you guys are doing the exact things that you're accusing me of doing, just spouting off without providing any meaningful evidence. Save me! I think the word is "hypocrite".

Here are some meaningful questions for you sane folks out there, because frankly, I have no answer:

1. Where are the shell casings? There has to be at least 1500 - 2000 thousands.
2. Where are the surveillance videos?
3. Are the police and FBI really that incompetence? Why couldn't they get their timeline straight?
4. Have you seen the lower roof of the Mandalay Bay connecting directly to a parking garage?

A lot more questions than I care to type here, none of which I have answer for.

@BxgJ, I saw that vid too but know it was strobe, because anyone have ever seen muzzle flash will tell you that those are not muzzle flashes. But, the beginning of that video is what I'm interested in, based on the acoustics of the shots, and the driver's position.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,528
17,036
136
You're quoting 4chan as evidence? What the fuck is wrong with your brain?

Its on the internet therefore its true.


The internet is like photography back in the early days. When it was first invented it was magical and mysterious. Then people learned how to manipulate photographs and gullible people started believing crazy shit like fairies. We are in the fairy phase of the internet where gullible people believe really, really, stupid shit.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cottingley_Fairies

Cottingley_Fairies_1.jpg
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,083
9,564
146
See, you guys are doing the exact things that you're accusing me of doing, just spouting off without providing any meaningful evidence. Save me! I think the word is "hypocrite".

Here are some meaningful questions for you sane folks out there, because frankly, I have no answer:

1. Where are the shell casings? There has to be at least 1500 - 2000 thousands.
2. Where are the surveillance videos?
3. Are the police and FBI really that incompetence? Why couldn't they get their timeline straight?
4. Have you seen the lower roof of the Mandalay Bay connecting directly to a parking garage?

A lot more questions than I care to type here, none of which I have answer for.

@BxgJ, I saw that vid too but know it was strobe, because anyone have ever seen muzzle flash will tell you that those are not muzzle flashes. But, the beginning of that video is what I'm interested in, based on the acoustics of the shots, and the driver's position.
All I've asked is why your source should be given credibility? What are his qualifications to do an acoustical analysis and where is his reviewable material to confirm his findings? Is it an extreme thing to ask when you want people to believe and give credibility to something like that?
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
See, you guys are doing the exact things that you're accusing me of doing, just spouting off without providing any meaningful evidence. Save me! I think the word is "hypocrite".

Here are some meaningful questions for you sane folks out there, because frankly, I have no answer:

1. Where are the shell casings? There has to be at least 1500 - 2000 thousands.
2. Where are the surveillance videos?
3. Are the police and FBI really that incompetence? Why couldn't they get their timeline straight?
4. Have you seen the lower roof of the Mandalay Bay connecting directly to a parking garage?

A lot more questions than I care to type here, none of which I have answer for.

@BxgJ, I saw that vid too but know it was strobe, because anyone have ever seen muzzle flash will tell you that those are not muzzle flashes. But, the beginning of that video is what I'm interested in, based on the acoustics of the shots, and the driver's position.
Google 180ms delay an listen to an example and the come back an tell me you can’t hear it.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,528
17,036
136
All I've asked is why your source should be given credibility? What are his qualifications to do an acoustical analysis and where is his reviewable material to confirm his findings? Is it an extreme thing to ask when you want people to believe and give credibility to something like that?

Lol! No! You must disprove that video with your own scientific data and analysis and if you dare ask him to do the same or at the very least show why the guy in the video should be trusted, well then, obviously you are a shill and an "agent"!






Lol wtf is an agent in his context?
 

allisolm

Elite Member
Administrator
Jan 2, 2001
25,322
4,987
136
Did you watch the first video at least? That was not posted anywhere in the other thread. If you haven't watched it, then please be kind and correct your post. If you have watched it, please refute it with your own scientific data.

I watched it. It's the opinion of the "Health Ranger", an internet activist and target shooter who works in a lab that tests foods and dietary supplements. His "scientific data" isn't. It's his opinion and it is NOT "additional information that has been uncovered".
 

J.Wilkins

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,681
640
91
Maybe he was just trolling or he knew something, we will know the truth if those laws pass.

Did you know that carrots are actually baby Jesuses!

If I post that on 4chan, maybe I'm onto something?

For fucks sakes, kid, just stop.
 

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
I watched it. It's the opinion of the "Health Ranger", an internet activist and target shooter who works in a lab that tests foods and dietary supplements. His "scientific data" isn't. It's his opinion and it is NOT "additional information that has been uncovered".
What about this guy? https://youtu.be/nG2oQ65zi-Q?t=924, he's just some schmuck. Curious though, are any of the numbers he's throwing around in his video wrong?
 

J.Wilkins

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,681
640
91
See, you guys are doing the exact things that you're accusing me of doing, just spouting off without providing any meaningful evidence. Save me! I think the word is "hypocrite".

Here are some meaningful questions for you sane folks out there, because frankly, I have no answer:

1. Where are the shell casings? There has to be at least 1500 - 2000 thousands.
2. Where are the surveillance videos?
3. Are the police and FBI really that incompetence? Why couldn't they get their timeline straight?
4. Have you seen the lower roof of the Mandalay Bay connecting directly to a parking garage?

A lot more questions than I care to type here, none of which I have answer for.

@BxgJ, I saw that vid too but know it was strobe, because anyone have ever seen muzzle flash will tell you that those are not muzzle flashes. But, the beginning of that video is what I'm interested in, based on the acoustics of the shots, and the driver's position.

1. They were found in the apartment according to those first on scene and those who later collected them. Around 2K were found.
2. There are surveillence videos from some instances but not all have been released, this is standard procedure.
3. Made up bullshit timelines do not correspond with the actual timeline and you say that the actual reported timeline is wrong? Why are you so willing to believe random bullshit over the actual story?

4. Yes, what the fuck does that have to do with anything, the guy was on the 32'nd floor.

Again, some random nutjob that claims to be a scientist in every single fucking field of science does not a scientist make and there is a case file a mile long on this clown that might just lead to him spending a lifetime in jail. Some people, actual scientists in the field of genetic coding of viral antibodies have been asked to provide specific evidence against claims this nobody fucktard has made.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
SSSnail said:
You're right, and you can, but not in that setting


What makes that setting special, sound follows the same laws no matter where it is. There’s early and late reflection from all the buildings he’s not taking into account, also all examined audio must be taken from the exact same spot or the measurements are flawed.
 

J.Wilkins

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,681
640
91
I’ve been a sound engineer for nearly forty years, Jstorm will confirm what I’m saying.

Well considering your previous writings on this matter I have absolutely no reason to doubt this and... good to know... now I have two experts to refer to. :)

If you ever need an expert in biology (any field, really) or chemistry (ties in with biochemistry which is actually chemistry) you can give me a holler. :)
 

J.Wilkins

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,681
640
91
Yeah whatever, see you in 3 years...

LOL, you are going away for three years? Is that how badly it sucks for you to be wrong?

Just admit it, just say it out loud once "I believed shit on the internet forum 4chan"...

Once you do, you're welcome to a more rational discussion on the topic or any other topic.