Some additional information about the Las Vegas shooter

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

J.Wilkins

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,681
640
91
Why don't you in all your wisdom and knowledge and technical know-how dissuade me? You're capable of at least that, right?

Why would I? You have a belief that you want to hold and you are welcome to hold it. My critique cannot dissuade you from your ignorance because it's wilful and NO ONE, not even me, can fix that.

You have a bunch of idiots making claims and that is ALL you have. You wouldn't believe it unless you WANTED to believe it either.
 

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
Full disclosure, I've been on both ends of shooting and hearing bullets being shot at, impacts, and echos, and distance, etc...

Your turn.
 

J.Wilkins

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,681
640
91
Full disclosure, I've been on both ends of shooting and hearing bullets being shot at, impacts, and echos, and distance, etc...

Your turn.

Who cares? Does this make your sources more credible? Do you think it makes YOU more credible?

Were you shot in the frontal lobe by any chance?
 

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
Why would I? You have a belief that you want to hold and you are welcome to hold it. My critique cannot dissuade you from your ignorance because it's wilful and NO ONE, not even me, can fix that.

You have a bunch of idiots making claims and that is ALL you have. You wouldn't believe it unless you WANTED to believe it either.
No, what you're doing is just pure critique without offering any sort of refuting evidence. I'm not one to blindly believe in something, I'm well capable of admitting wrong, if I'm proven wrong. Prove me wrong.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
I can blow a hole in the first video without even trying, he claimed a human can’t hear a .18 second delay, total BS if you can’t hear a 180ms delay then you’re nearly deaf. The reports also are affected by all the reflections caused by all the glass walls causing the delays.
 

Rifter

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,522
751
126
OP, AT P&N is not the place for logical/honest debates, to many SJW's and trolls, as you have found out by posting this thread. We are on page 2 and still not one legit real reply to the topic in the OP. I suggest finding another website if you seriously want a honest debate on this subject matter.
 

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
I can blow a hole in the first video without even trying, he claimed a human can’t hear a .18 second delay, total BS if you can’t hear a 180ms delay then you’re nearly deaf.
You're right, and you can, but not in that setting.
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,101
9,587
146
Oh Jesus Christ natural news? Stopped there. Tell you what. You show me the qualifications of this person to do acoustic analysis and we can go from there. But come on. Mike Smith has been discredited over and over and over again.
 

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
OP, AT P&N is not the place for logical/honest debates, to many SJW's and trolls, as you have found out by posting this thread. We are on page 2 and still not one legit real reply to the topic in the OP. I suggest finding another website if you seriously want a honest debate on this subject matter.
Yeah, I just logged on after years because in the actual shooting thread, there was no information provided except for the misinformation. I just want to make sure they keep this afloat.
 

J.Wilkins

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,681
640
91
No, what you're doing is just pure critique without offering any sort of refuting evidence. I'm not one to blindly believe in something, I'm well capable of admitting wrong, if I'm proven wrong. Prove me wrong.

Ah, so I need to prove your claims false even though they are just made up bullshit from some idiots on the internet that have no fucking knowledge or education what so ever to do any forensic analysis?

Here's a clue you dumb fuck, if you want to make a claim YOU provide the evidence. All I'm doing is saying "I don't believe you" and for that I need no evidence what so ever.

Again, this is like having a discussion with a very religious person who proclaims that I need to prove his narrative wrong..
 

J.Wilkins

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,681
640
91
Yeah, I just logged on after years because in the actual shooting thread, there was no information provided except for the misinformation. I just want to make sure they keep this afloat.

Stop doing whatever drugs you are doing... That is my advice to you...

The truth of a deranged mind is exactly whatever you want it to be, you have left all critical thinking behind and accepted something that is easily dismissed as the musings of idiots.

Look, I don't even know you but I'm sure that you are better than this. Get down from your high, spend a week without drugs and then think it over... If you are still in a state of paranoid delusions then seek help.
 

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
Yeah, that idiot just happens to be a science director of this http://cwclabs.com/. I'm sure he's a bit more qualified than you. And, the information in that video can be verified by any idiots using Google.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,598
17,146
136
OP, AT P&N is not the place for logical/honest debates, to many SJW's and trolls, as you have found out by posting this thread. We are on page 2 and still not one legit real reply to the topic in the OP. I suggest finding another website if you seriously want a honest debate on this subject matter.

Don't let the door hit you on your way out!
 

BxgJ

Golden Member
Jul 27, 2015
1,054
123
106
This reminds me of the day after the shooting. Some guys at work were all on the 'there's more they're not telling us' train, after seeing a video that seemed to show the flashes from a second shooter much closer to the ground. After I got annoyed enough I spent a few minutes looking it up, and of course it had been debunked already, with nothing less than another video on instagram. That one was from well before the shooting, and showed the same 'flashing light' in the same spot, as it was a strobe light. The guys here shut up after that, but I'm sure the original video is still making the rounds on the conspiracy sites/forums.

With regards to an audio analysis, from some dude on youtube, it's not worth the bandwidth used to watch it unless it's done by professionals. There are too many ways things like echoes and such will make for a false analysis.
 

J.Wilkins

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,681
640
91
Yeah, that idiot just happens to be a science director of this http://cwclabs.com/. I'm sure he's a bit more qualified than you.

If I was you I wouldn't make that bet and I would not count him as a scientist, as a worth pissing on kind of guy or as a sane human being.

He's head scientist at a fake lab that doesn't do any research what so ever but publishes opinion pieces, he has no degree in anything, he doesn't even understand the basics of biology which he proclaims to be an expert in and yet you think he's an expert in a field that not even HE proclaims to be an expert in?

You want to know about this, contact Jstorm, he knows his shit far better than me or this guy.
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,101
9,587
146
I see nothing that qualifies him as a sound expert, I’ve been in sound business for forty years.
He's not even qualified as a food water etc... Expert. He's been roundly rejected by every scientific body for his faulty methods and reasoning. He's a joke.
 
Feb 27, 2014
47
38
91
Who took Paddock's hard rive?

1506977666345.png