• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

So Fox says Biden email confirmed.

Isn't that the way this all works now? "Unnamed" recipients or sources or what ever the hell you want to call them dominate a lot of the news headlines. I mean jesus christ just look at how many stories about Trump there are that site 'unnamed recipients" as the source or as the news likes to put it "A source close to the White House states".
You believe those stories when for example CNN or MSNBC airs them so what exactly is the difference? The original news source being Fox? Is that what makes this less believable?
 
check out the story itself. It is the most improbable cobbled together bullshit involving Rudy Giuliani? WTF?
 
bbhaag said:
Isn't that the way this all works now? "Unnamed" recipients or sources or what ever the hell you want to call them dominate a lot of the news headlines. I mean jesus christ just look at how many stories about Trump there are that site 'unnamed recipients" as the source or as the news likes to put it "A source close to the White House states".
You believe those stories when for example CNN or MSNBC airs them so what exactly is the difference? The original news source being Fox? Is that what makes this less believable?
Click to expand...
Because that source at the WH is obviously not wanting the attention of angering Trump and facing reparations.
In the Biden case claiming this email legit is accusing the former VP of several severe federal crimes, a news agency
should vet the source 100% before posting this, something tells me Fox, owned by Trump buddy Murdoch, is deathly
afraid Trump is heading for an epic loss will be his lap-dog in time of dire need.
 
bbhaag said:
Isn't that the way this all works now? "Unnamed" recipients or sources or what ever the hell you want to call them dominate a lot of the news headlines. I mean jesus christ just look at how many stories about Trump there are that site 'unnamed recipients" as the source or as the news likes to put it "A source close to the White House states".
You believe those stories when for example CNN or MSNBC airs them so what exactly is the difference? The original news source being Fox? Is that what makes this less believable?
Click to expand...


It's called integrity.
 
BUTCH1 said:
Fox just posted this yesterday, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-china-email-source-verifies claiming that an "unnamed" recipient
on a Hunter Biden email has corroborated it's authenticity. The white house is exited and posting all over Twitter, gee morons, doesn't the fact that
this recipient is "unnamed" have any meaning to you or is the desperation so severe this is irrelevant?.
Click to expand...

LOL
The article itself dances around that the whole things is bullshit. It's as if the writers know they are writing about bullshit and are trying to strike a balance between following FoxNews formatting and trying to be professional.

A source (Guiliani) says that in 2017, that big guy = Biden and was going to get that sweet cash....in 2000 fucking 17, from the chinaman.
Cuz that chinaman is evil ....
Because we all know how influential Joe Biden was in 2017 and how the Chinese were just so set on currying favor.....

In the real world
The campaign also said it has released the former vice president’s tax documents and returns, which do not reflect any involvement with Chinese investments.
Click to expand...
 
You know we have a thread where all black people who are shot by cops goes to, so why not have a single thread of all the bullshit conspiracies that come out against people trump doesn't like? That way we don't have to wade through thread after thread of bull shit.
 
Also Dude,

the-chinaman-is-n7lqov.jpg



Asian American, please.
 
trump's craziness Is so overwhelming I had forgotten about fraud guarantee. I have to remind myself that rudy is a guaranteed fraud. Anything associated with him should be automatically rejected.
 
bbhaag said:
Isn't that the way this all works now? "Unnamed" recipients or sources or what ever the hell you want to call them dominate a lot of the news headlines. I mean jesus christ just look at how many stories about Trump there are that site 'unnamed recipients" as the source or as the news likes to put it "A source close to the White House states".
You believe those stories when for example CNN or MSNBC airs them so what exactly is the difference? The original news source being Fox? Is that what makes this less believable?
Click to expand...

To people here? yes.
 
Hmm
Who owns the NY Post?
In 1976, Rupert Murdoch bought the Post for US$30.5 million. Since 1993, the Post has been owned by News Corporation and its successor, News Corp, which had owned it previously from 1976 to 1988.

Who owns Fox Corporation?
It is owned by the Murdoch family via a family trust with 39% interest; Rupert Murdoch is chairman,
 
As far as Trump's base is concerned, every single fake made up "evidence" that points to some kind of dirty business that their enemies (Democrats, deep state, liberal socialist commies, "the far left", antifa, BLM etc. etc." or whatever and whoever Trump can conjure up in his nightmares and tells his supporters they must hate) is something they can cling to in their desperate hour of need.

With Trump now a well known entity notoriously known for being a liar, a cheat, a cowardly schoolyard bully and of all things a staunch defender of Vlad Putin and other authoritarians that he wishes he could be like, he now has a political track record that can be taken apart piece by piece, analysed and used against him, unlike the politically unknown he was back in '16.

It's a whole new ball game for Trump this time around yet he still thinks he's in the middle of the last one, throwing the same pitches that have been hit out of the park over and over and over again. Yet, there he is thinking he's in the same game that got him elected.

Sorry Dickhead Donald, you've been made and it ain't anything like the dictatorship you and your supporters wished or hoped it could be.
 
BUTCH1 said:
Fox just posted this yesterday, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-china-email-source-verifies claiming that an "unnamed" recipient
on a Hunter Biden email has corroborated it's authenticity. The white house is exited and posting all over Twitter, gee morons, doesn't the fact that
this recipient is "unnamed" have any meaning to you or is the desperation so severe this is irrelevant?.
Click to expand...
I’m confused - what misconduct does the ‘confirmed’ email show, even if it is referring to Biden? He was a private citizen at the time.

It is very clear that someone had access to Hunter Biden’s private materials and some materials are real. The thing is, without independent verification we have no idea what is real and what is not. When the Russians hacked Macron’s campaign they did this where they mixed forgeries in with real materials, hoping the real materials would make the forgeries appear genuine as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top