So Fox says Biden email confirmed.

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
ElFenix

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,414
8,356
126
how is this not a continuation of the existing thread on hunder's email trove?
 
bbhaag

bbhaag

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2011
6,657
2,042
146
Isn't that the way this all works now? "Unnamed" recipients or sources or what ever the hell you want to call them dominate a lot of the news headlines. I mean jesus christ just look at how many stories about Trump there are that site 'unnamed recipients" as the source or as the news likes to put it "A source close to the White House states".
You believe those stories when for example CNN or MSNBC airs them so what exactly is the difference? The original news source being Fox? Is that what makes this less believable?
 
skyking

skyking

Lifer
Nov 21, 2001
22,013
4,779
146
check out the story itself. It is the most improbable cobbled together bullshit involving Rudy Giuliani? WTF?
 
B

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
bbhaag said:
Isn't that the way this all works now? "Unnamed" recipients or sources or what ever the hell you want to call them dominate a lot of the news headlines. I mean jesus christ just look at how many stories about Trump there are that site 'unnamed recipients" as the source or as the news likes to put it "A source close to the White House states".
You believe those stories when for example CNN or MSNBC airs them so what exactly is the difference? The original news source being Fox? Is that what makes this less believable?
Click to expand...
Because that source at the WH is obviously not wanting the attention of angering Trump and facing reparations.
In the Biden case claiming this email legit is accusing the former VP of several severe federal crimes, a news agency
should vet the source 100% before posting this, something tells me Fox, owned by Trump buddy Murdoch, is deathly
afraid Trump is heading for an epic loss will be his lap-dog in time of dire need.
 
feralkid

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,478
4,551
136
bbhaag said:
Isn't that the way this all works now? "Unnamed" recipients or sources or what ever the hell you want to call them dominate a lot of the news headlines. I mean jesus christ just look at how many stories about Trump there are that site 'unnamed recipients" as the source or as the news likes to put it "A source close to the White House states".
You believe those stories when for example CNN or MSNBC airs them so what exactly is the difference? The original news source being Fox? Is that what makes this less believable?
Click to expand...


It's called integrity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soundforbjt, esquared and skyking
pauldun170

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,133
5,072
136
BUTCH1 said:
Fox just posted this yesterday, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-china-email-source-verifies claiming that an "unnamed" recipient
on a Hunter Biden email has corroborated it's authenticity. The white house is exited and posting all over Twitter, gee morons, doesn't the fact that
this recipient is "unnamed" have any meaning to you or is the desperation so severe this is irrelevant?.
Click to expand...

LOL
The article itself dances around that the whole things is bullshit. It's as if the writers know they are writing about bullshit and are trying to strike a balance between following FoxNews formatting and trying to be professional.

A source (Guiliani) says that in 2017, that big guy = Biden and was going to get that sweet cash....in 2000 fucking 17, from the chinaman.
Cuz that chinaman is evil ....
Because we all know how influential Joe Biden was in 2017 and how the Chinese were just so set on currying favor.....

In the real world
The campaign also said it has released the former vice president’s tax documents and returns, which do not reflect any involvement with Chinese investments.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ken g6, soundforbjt and skyking
ivwshane

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,222
14,910
136
You know we have a thread where all black people who are shot by cops goes to, so why not have a single thread of all the bullshit conspiracies that come out against people trump doesn't like? That way we don't have to wade through thread after thread of bull shit.
 
feralkid

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,478
4,551
136
Also Dude,

the-chinaman-is-n7lqov.jpg



Asian American, please.
 
pauldun170

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,133
5,072
136
feralkid said:
Also Dude,

the-chinaman-is-n7lqov.jpg



Asian American, please.
Click to expand...

In case you missed it, Guiliani is an asshole when it comes to Asians.
"chinaman" is something Guiliani likes to throw around.

Korean, Japanese, Chinese....
(Guiliani ): "Chinamen"
 
zzyzxroad

zzyzxroad

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2017
3,244
2,260
136
trump's craziness Is so overwhelming I had forgotten about fraud guarantee. I have to remind myself that rudy is a guaranteed fraud. Anything associated with him should be automatically rejected.
 
blackangst1

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,914
2,359
126
bbhaag said:
Isn't that the way this all works now? "Unnamed" recipients or sources or what ever the hell you want to call them dominate a lot of the news headlines. I mean jesus christ just look at how many stories about Trump there are that site 'unnamed recipients" as the source or as the news likes to put it "A source close to the White House states".
You believe those stories when for example CNN or MSNBC airs them so what exactly is the difference? The original news source being Fox? Is that what makes this less believable?
Click to expand...

To people here? yes.
 
Paratus

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
16,678
13,431
146
Hmm
Who owns the NY Post?
In 1976, Rupert Murdoch bought the Post for US$30.5 million. Since 1993, the Post has been owned by News Corporation and its successor, News Corp, which had owned it previously from 1976 to 1988.

Who owns Fox Corporation?
It is owned by the Murdoch family via a family trust with 39% interest; Rupert Murdoch is chairman,
 
  • Like
Reactions: alexruiz, Ken g6, Stopsignhank and 2 others
T

tweaker2

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
14,535
6,969
136
As far as Trump's base is concerned, every single fake made up "evidence" that points to some kind of dirty business that their enemies (Democrats, deep state, liberal socialist commies, "the far left", antifa, BLM etc. etc." or whatever and whoever Trump can conjure up in his nightmares and tells his supporters they must hate) is something they can cling to in their desperate hour of need.

With Trump now a well known entity notoriously known for being a liar, a cheat, a cowardly schoolyard bully and of all things a staunch defender of Vlad Putin and other authoritarians that he wishes he could be like, he now has a political track record that can be taken apart piece by piece, analysed and used against him, unlike the politically unknown he was back in '16.

It's a whole new ball game for Trump this time around yet he still thinks he's in the middle of the last one, throwing the same pitches that have been hit out of the park over and over and over again. Yet, there he is thinking he's in the same game that got him elected.

Sorry Dickhead Donald, you've been made and it ain't anything like the dictatorship you and your supporters wished or hoped it could be.
 
F

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,036
48,026
136
BUTCH1 said:
Fox just posted this yesterday, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-china-email-source-verifies claiming that an "unnamed" recipient
on a Hunter Biden email has corroborated it's authenticity. The white house is exited and posting all over Twitter, gee morons, doesn't the fact that
this recipient is "unnamed" have any meaning to you or is the desperation so severe this is irrelevant?.
Click to expand...
I’m confused - what misconduct does the ‘confirmed’ email show, even if it is referring to Biden? He was a private citizen at the time.

It is very clear that someone had access to Hunter Biden’s private materials and some materials are real. The thing is, without independent verification we have no idea what is real and what is not. When the Russians hacked Macron’s campaign they did this where they mixed forgeries in with real materials, hoping the real materials would make the forgeries appear genuine as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom