Originally posted by: MacBaine
Holy crap you're an idiot. He deserves your bike.
R!O!F!L!!!!
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Holy crap you're an idiot. He deserves your bike.
Originally posted by: exdeath
If it were me, he would have been asked once to put it down. After that I would have physically confronted him to remove it from his grasp, and had he posed any resistance that jepordized my safey, he would have been quickly introduced to the naughty end of the H&K USP .40 and asked a second time.
The justification is that you have every right to secure your property. If the thief puts up resistance when you attempt to recover your property, not only has he stolen your property, but he is now a danger to your safety as well. Thus when you aim a weopon at him, it is not because he has your $50 bike, it is because he has threatened your safety when you attempted to retrieve the bike.
Originally posted by: Gurck
Gotta question the legality of this. With people pouring coffee on their laps and all but intentionally flipping their SUVs and sueing for millions - and winning - it's entirely within the realm of plausibility for a thief to sue you in that scenario (or even in one where you beat him up, or worse didn't beat him up but he acts the part) and win. Not that I wouldn't have beaten the living sh*t out of him in SurgicalShark's situation, but I'd be fearful of a lawsuit afterwards.
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: Gurck
Gotta question the legality of this. With people pouring coffee on their laps and all but intentionally flipping their SUVs and sueing for millions - and winning - it's entirely within the realm of plausibility for a thief to sue you in that scenario (or even in one where you beat him up, or worse didn't beat him up but he acts the part) and win. Not that I wouldn't have beaten the living sh*t out of him in SurgicalShark's situation, but I'd be fearful of a lawsuit afterwards.
I don't really care about the bike; it's the principal behind it. The rights to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the right of private property ownership are essential to free people and are guaranteed by the US Constitution. If you allow someone to impose his or her will illegally against you in ANY way that violates those liberties, then where do you draw the line? To what extent do you compromise your freedom for the sake of political correctness?
Be it government tyranny or a trivial personal dispute like a bike theft, said freedoms are always worth standing up for even at the risk of personal harm. Otherwise someone else owns your life and you have no basis for living; nothing is sacred and nothing else matters at that point.
What next? You car? Your children? Your life?
If you let guys like this get away, you will be a pawn. If you do nothing because you might get sued, you are his AND the lawyer?s pawn. Living in fear or slavery is not living at all.
As an American you have an obligation to stand up for yourself! Just be sure you are capable of escalating a reasonable response in proportion to the threat and keep control of the situation. If that means being armed, so be it. For all you know, he could have pulled out a Glock just because you saw him. A guy like this only considers your life worth threatening for a $50 or even $5000 bike. Chances are he had not placed a value on his own life. Enlighten him.
Besides nobody needs to be hurt. All need be done is for the bike to be released and him to leave immediately. Let him make that choice.
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Holy crap you're an idiot. He deserves your bike.
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Holy crap you're an idiot. He deserves your bike.
Originally posted by: montanafan
The following article appeared in the Baltimore SUN on November 12, 1999:
"The death of a man who was beaten during a robbery Saturday [November 6, 1999] has been ruled a homicide by the state medical examiner, police said yesterday."
"Jessy Hill, 31, of the 2400 block of W. Cold Spring Lane was attacked by four males in the 4000 block of Park Heights Ave., police said. The attackers stole his bicycle."
"Hill died of blunt force trauma to the head Tuesday [Novmber 9, 1999] at Sinai Hospital, police said. No arrests have been made in the case." What else is new?
Update - Thursday, 1 July 2004 11:03
An update to the murder at Clouds Hill Road, St George on Monday June 28.
Police are now in a position to name the dead man as Craig Ian Fussell, aged 27 from the Bristol area.
Police yesterday obtained a warrant of further detention in relation to a 32-year-old man and a 31-year-old woman. This allows them to continue to detain and question the pair until midnight tonight (Thursday).
The police are aware that the deceased was involved in a dispute with two young black men in St George?s Park, St George, during the afternoon/evening of Monday June 28. It is believed the dispute involved a bicycle.
A 21-year-old man accused of fatally shooting another man in a protracted dispute about a bicycle was booked into the Pima County jail after authorities found him in Phoenix late Monday.
Investigators with the Tucson Police Department developed information on Monday that Justin Avery Guyot was hiding out in a hotel in Phoenix and contacted the Phoenix Police Department, said Sgt. Judy Altieri, a Tucson police spokeswoman.
Phoenix officers went to the hotel and arrested Guyot without incident, holding him until Tucson police arrived and returned him to Tucson, she said.
Officials had obtained an arrest warrant for Guyot last Wednesday on charges of first-degree murder and drive-by shooting in the death of Edward Brown, also 21. Investigators believe Guyot, and, possibly others, drove by and exchanged words with Brown as he walked with a relative in the 5300 block of East 25th Street, near South Craycroft Road, about 7:15 p.m. on April 27.
BACKGROUND: Bicycle theft escalates to triple murder
Juha Valjakkala became a part of Finnish and Swedish crime history in 1988 when he was convicted of the murder of a family of three at a cemetery in the northern Swedish community of Åmsele.
The series of events that led to the killings began when the 23-year-old Valjakkala was released from a prison in Turku on May 1 1988, after which he started wandering through Sweden and Finland with his 21-year-old girlfriend Marita Routalampi.
On July 3 they arrived in Åmsele. At night Valjakkala stole a bicycle. He was pursued by Sten Nilsson and his 13-year-old son Fredrik. The chase ended at a cemetery where Sten and Fredrik Nilsson were shot. Later Sten's wife and Fredrik's mother, Ewa Nilsson went looking for the two and was stabbed to death outside the cemetery.
Valjakkala and Routalampi were caught in Odense, Denmark just over a week later.
Boy, 12, fires gun in fight over bicycle, police say
By ALICIA CALDWELL
© St. Petersburg Times, published May 17, 2000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ST. PETERSBURG -- A dispute between two seventh-grade boys over a bicycle turned violent Monday night when one of them got a gun and shot at the other, police said.
A 12-year-old, who lives in the 1100 block of 16th Avenue S, was arrested and charged with two counts of aggravated assault with a firearm, said Dan Bates, St. Petersburg police spokesman. He was charged as a juvenile, and his name was withheld because of his age.
He is accused of firing a handgun at a 15-year-old, who lives in the 1500 block of 12th Street S. Both boys are students at Richard L. Sanders Exceptional Education Center in Pinellas Park. No one was injured.
Bates said the boys were arguing about a bicycle, taking it from each another and throwing bricks at each other. The 15-year-old ultimately took the bike. The younger boy left, and returned with at least one friend.
The argument continued in front of the older boy's house. The 12-year-old was given a handgun by his friend. The 15-year-old saw the gun and sprinted for his house, diving inside the door. He heard at least one shot.
The 12-year-old and his friend ran away. The 12-year-old was later arrested by police. His friend, who supplied the gun, was described as an older male. He was not apprehended, and the gun was not recovered.
Bias Crime or Biased Journalism?
A Hispanic mob beat a Bangladeshi man to death in Brooklyn Sunday. What it a bias crime? That depends which newspaper you read. The New York Times reports that "although several Bangladeshis and Hispanic residents interviewed yesterday in the neighborhood said there was some tension between the two groups, and the attacker was described as an Hispanic man, the police said they believed the attack--and others that night--stemmed from the initial dispute over the bicycle rather than from racial bias."The violence erupted in the neighborhood of East New York after a fight broke out over a stolen bicycle, police said. It allegedly began when a 12-year-old Bangladeshi American boy riding the bike accidentally grazed a Latino teen, who then stole the bike. The Bangladeshi American boy then called his friends for help. After a member of the Bangladeshi group was able to retrieve the bicycle, the fighting escalated and gunshots were fired, say authorities. According to investigators, the Latinos ? many of whom had allegedly been drinking earlier at the Dominican Day parade in Manhattan ? then began attacking Bangladeshi men they encountered at random. At least three were injured.
Prosecutors Say Dispute Over A Bicycle
POSTED: 1:13 pm CDT July 6, 2004
CHICAGO -- A Cook County judge has denied bail for a 16-year-old boy who has been accused of shooting a man after an apparent dispute over a bicycle.
Patrick Buchanan, of the 1500 block of South Karlov Avenue, appeared for the hearing at noon in Violence Court. He was charged as an adult with first-degree murder in the fatal shooting of Cordell Davidson, police News Affairs Officer Laura Kubiak said.
Davidson, 18, was shot around 3 p.m. on June 23 at 4032 W. 16th St., after an apparent dispute over a bicycle, Kubiak said. At least two witnesses identified Buchanan as Davidson's killer, Assistant State's Attorney Nick Kondelis said.
Witnesses said Davidson and the boy had been quarreling over the bicycle at 1614 S. Komensky Ave., Marquette District Lt. John Kenny said. The boy left the scene and returned a short while later with a handgun and fired an unknown number of shots at the victim, he added. The boy then allegedly ran off with the handgun.
When police arrived, they found the victim in the street with gunshot wounds to the chest and thigh, police News Affairs Sgt. Robert Cargie said.
8 people dead over bicycle disputes
You may have done the smart thing.
Originally posted by: DJFuji
"Better to die on your feet than live a lifetime on your knees"
Originally posted by: flashbacck
Originally posted by: DJFuji
"Better to die on your feet than live a lifetime on your knees"
In many cases I completely agree. In this case... it's a BIKE.
Originally posted by: EugeneChien
So someone explain to me, if he was carrying the bike, what are his chances of pulling a knife or a gun for that matter when you take him to the ground and put him in a submission?
This definately sounds like a joke to me..
