OIC wimax.... data.... no LTE up and running tho? Sprint makes it sound like 4g's already done in tiehr commercials.
Not sure there are any 4g phones available at this point.
Yeah, no PR problems here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmgKDvWdi6o
As long as there are subsidied phones, there are going to ETF fees. And it appears the american consumer overall likes cheap subsidized phones.
And there is about a 1/10 of a percent difference between verizon on dropped calls.
Look kid, I pay for good service for ATT, and I would like it to stay that way.
Read that a few times, it will sink in.
Yeah, for years now, when someone googles ATT, they'll come across a link about how unhappy people are with ATT, it's a PR firm's worst nightmare.
"Oh fuck, Verizon's ads are popular & accurate and our customers are trying to bring down the network? Only Luke Wilson can save us now."
What do you suggest we in the US actually do to change the cell industry that will actually work?
Everyone cancel their service, be left with a useless phone, pay an ETF fee between $150 & $300 and sign another contract with another cell company?
Do you really thing change happens when no one asks for it? The cell carriers are just going to change their business practices out of the goodness of their heart?
Yet Verizon doesn't have a massive PR problem.
snip
Could it be possible that maybe this is just much ado about nothing.
There are no doubt some bandwidth problems, but as I have stated several times ATT is putting more capacity in place. While capex was cut during a recession, they are still spending several billion this year on wireless. That is far cry from nothing, which is what you continue to claim.
You also continue to fail to answer how verizons network would have handled the iphones bandwidth requirements.
LOL, you keep saying the same things over & over, go find another thread.
SNL jumped on the bandwagon, if you think ATT's not going to do some serious work in SF & NYC now, you're sadly mistaken.
ATT & Apple shareholders are now well aware of the criticism, and will be asking questions...
But I guess a couple of complaint letters/emails that get ignored will make a bigger difference.
![]()
Is reading a serious issue for you?
You're right, I do keep saying the same thing because you keep ignoring it when I've posted the solutions to your [supposed] problems.
Oh, SNL made fun of the iPhone's calling issues (notice they didn't mention data though, which is a big part of what this issue is), damn, no doubt things will get changed now.
A couple? If you had the same number of people who joined the Facebook group for the "protest" then it would amount to more than a couple. So, let's see, they could do the exact same thing they've already done (whine about it on the internet), but they could do it in a little complaint section. Care to guess which would be more effective in actually getting something accomplished?
http://esupport.fcc.gov/complaints.htm?sid=&id=d1e408
Apparently that's too damn difficult.
What did you expect verizon to say? That they have done nothing to prepare their networks? My point and has been along that all carriers have had significant investment in their networks, ATT included.
LOL, the thing is, it's made a difference, and will continue to make a difference.
Kills you doesn't it
What I find interesting, as that this thread is so important to you...
Welcome to the internets, things are going to be different.
Operation Chokehold is a harbinger of things to come, will there be stupid shit protested? of course, and there'll be shit that makes me crazier than this makes you, but the world is changing, only a fool doesn't realize it...
No, I'm glad something is [supposedly] being done. Too bad this is something that could have been accomplished years ago. Fact is, like I posted earlier, something was already being done, so I'm not sure how you can feel like this really accomplished much. Verizon did far more damage to AT&T than this did.
See, you think I'm pissed that this has gotten press, I'm not. In fact, I'm smart enough to know that by posting, I'm actually helping to keep this in people's awareness. Of course, maybe there's a reason I kept posting the same stuff over and over, about better ways to go about accomplishing the same thing? Surely not. It must be because I didn't want something to be accomplished, clearly, that must have been why I was talking about better ways of achieving the same goal.
Harbinger of things to come? This is the same shit that's been tried before. I'm still laughing that you consider this protesting and comparable to things have come before. MLK Jr. is rolling in his grave at your bastardization of civil disobedience.
Welcome to the internets? Just where the fuck have you been?
Last month I was lucky if I got 2Mbps. Now I'm getting closer to 4Mbps? The closest server is in Hammond, LA so that might play into it not being 5 Mbps. Not sure though. I'll keep testing. Anybody else in Miami seeing faster speeds?
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Hints-Of-72-Mbps-ATT-3G-In-Kansas-City-106060
Last post in the thread, yet another sign of ATT doing nothing to upgrade it networks.
It's not just about towers either...AT&T was the lowest-rated cell-phone service provider and received low marks in voice service and customer support. Verizon was the top-rated carrier and handily beat AT&T in all areas surveyed.
Did you read all the posts of folks saying they can't even get 3G service in that thread?
And a software update to the existing network ain't rocket science.
Meh, the 90 bucks a month i pay for service is pretty standard across all of the other networks. *shurg*
Actually, no. With Sprint, I pay 56 a month for unlimited anytime mobile to mobile (any network) phone calls and unlimited nighttime/weekend landline calls, 450 minutes a month for weekday daytime landline calls. Also Unlimited texting, and data on my blackberry.
Sure, you gripe that their customer service sucks, but I've never had to call support since switching over.
You guys with AT&T have no idea how bad you have it.