No. Of course we can always get some 'good results' by workers working for less, and less, and less, and eventually slavery.
That's not our goal as a society which should be the opposite, for as many as possible to have as much wealth as possible.
The minimum wage is an essential tool for preventing the race to the bottom of people working for just enough to eat, and it's too low.
Rather than having international competition be used to break labor organization and pull American workers down, a global approach should be made to pull others up.
You mention the minimum wage is too low. What dollar figure or range do you think it should be?
Do you believe a federal minimum wage would do a better job than states in setting "minimum" wage floors for what they consider to be? Why?
Do you believe there should be a "maximum" wage? If so, what should it be?
Let me return the agreement - we can't bring the rest of the world 'up to US standards'. For resource alone, we'd need like five planet earths for copying our consumption.
But I'm saying that our policies should try to raise others rather than pull the US down to the extent possible. Unfortunately, almost no one has that agenda (but progressives).
That's not possible.
"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".
It's complete utopia to believe that we can pull people in 3rd world countries without a detriment to the US and other 1st world nations.
If you're for "pulling the 3rd world countries up from their bootstraps", then surely you must support outsourcing because it achieves exactly that.
Look how far China and India have advanced the past 20 years...If there were no outsourcing those factory and call center workers would still be living in rural areas plowing fields(actually they might even be jobless since it's their grandparents and parents that own the fields and not them).
As China and India develop to 2nd world, jobs will be outsourced to Vietnam which would later increase the livelihood of the citizens there.
I see Progressives as having the same problems as Capitalists...Great in theory, no basis in reality.
Most Capitalists, along with the Chamber of Commerce believe in "unfettered" free trade. We both know what the result of that is, so I won't go much into it, but if you want to know...See NAFTA. Mexico was the beneficiary of it mostly to the detriment of USA.
Most Progressives believe in high tariffs and prevention of outsourcing, but yet they still say they are trying to pull 3rd world countries up by denying them manufacturing jobs that they are easily capable of doing?
Somewhere between the Capitalists and the Progressives, I'm sure there's a middle ground on trade, but I can't make any sense of where exactly that is.