Shimmering brought up in the [H]ardOCP 7900 article

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

nib95

Senior member
Jan 31, 2006
997
0
0
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: nib95
Originally posted by: lifeguard1999
In regard to the noise from the latest crop of video cards...

From Guru3d:
7600GT - 48 dB
7900GT - 50 dB
7900GTX - 44dB
X1800GTO - 52 dB
X1900XTX - 50 dB


Looks like the Gt's a bit of a screamer.
I just emailed Arctic cooling, wanna know if the NV Silencer 5 or Asselero X1 will fit my 7900 GT's.
If not, looks like it's the Zalman VF900 will be the daddy.
Not sure which of the 3 coolers is best.
But I'm sure they'll provide much better temps and OC's then that dreadful puny stock cooler.

Yes, it does seem relatively loud. Probably due to the single slot cooling and much smaller fan. Would it have killed them to use a larger fan? LOL.


Not them, but perhaps they're sales.
Because lets face it, a 7900 GT with a GTX cooler could potentially OC to exactly GTX speeds at a much cheaper price.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,219
55
91
I suppose it would if the cores are not speed binned and the memory is the same.
 

5150Joker

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2002
5,549
0
71
www.techinferno.com
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
I suppose it would if the cores are not speed binned and the memory is the same.


AFAIK the memory used for 7900 GT's is 1.4ns so it's unlikely they'll come close to OC'ing as good as a GTX that has 1.1ns memory and probably higher voltage as well.
 

nib95

Senior member
Jan 31, 2006
997
0
0
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
I suppose it would if the cores are not speed binned and the memory is the same.


AFAIK the memory used for 7900 GT's is 1.4ns so it's unlikely they'll come close to OC'ing as good as a GTX that has 1.1ns memory and probably higher voltage as well.


I'm sure they could, because I've already seen an XFX 7900 GT XXX Extreme version that is factory OC'd to 560/1650 with the stock cooler. thats already faster memory then the stock 7900 GTX memory speeds.
Now imagine what it could do with an aftermarket cooler?

I'm guessing 600/1700.
Maybe even more on the core, who knows.

 

450R

Senior member
Feb 22, 2005
319
0
0
You guys are still acting like children. Fact is, both cards shimmer, it's more noticeable on NV cards, and everyone now knows (whether they knew before or not). As someone else said, the bottom line is that it's pathetic that someone spends $500, be it for ATI or NV, and ends up with this kind of crap.

My dad can beat up your dad and my bike is cooler than yours. Let's keep arguing about insignificant things, 'cause I'm sure this debate will end up on the nightly news along with war, death, poverty, famine and rape. It's so important!
 

5150Joker

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2002
5,549
0
71
www.techinferno.com
Originally posted by: nib95
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
I suppose it would if the cores are not speed binned and the memory is the same.


AFAIK the memory used for 7900 GT's is 1.4ns so it's unlikely they'll come close to OC'ing as good as a GTX that has 1.1ns memory and probably higher voltage as well.


I'm sure they could, because I've already seen an XFX 7900 GT XXX Extreme version that is factory OC'd to 560/1650 with the stock cooler. thats already faster memory then the stock 7900 GTX memory speeds.
Now imagine what it could do with an aftermarket cooler?

I'm guessing 600/1700.
Maybe even more on the core, who knows.


The factory OC'd cards could be running on higher voltages. I really doubt a standard GT will hit 1700 mhz on the memory if it has 1.4ns. When you get your GT's let us know though. BTW if you have the balls, here's a voltmod for the 7900: http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=3330
 

will889

Golden Member
Sep 15, 2003
1,463
5
81
lmao@450r :) True too. This shimmer issue and other shadow issues have been going on for some time now. Nothing new.
 

nib95

Senior member
Jan 31, 2006
997
0
0
So can anyone give me a follow up on what type of ram the 7900 GT uses?
Any close up pics?

1.2ns ram or 1.4ns?
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,219
55
91
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: nib95
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
I suppose it would if the cores are not speed binned and the memory is the same.


AFAIK the memory used for 7900 GT's is 1.4ns so it's unlikely they'll come close to OC'ing as good as a GTX that has 1.1ns memory and probably higher voltage as well.


I'm sure they could, because I've already seen an XFX 7900 GT XXX Extreme version that is factory OC'd to 560/1650 with the stock cooler. thats already faster memory then the stock 7900 GTX memory speeds.
Now imagine what it could do with an aftermarket cooler?

I'm guessing 600/1700.
Maybe even more on the core, who knows.


The factory OC'd cards could be running on higher voltages. I really doubt a standard GT will hit 1700 mhz on the memory if it has 1.4ns. When you get your GT's let us know though. BTW if you have the balls, here's a voltmod for the 7900: http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=3330

Joker, can we keep the "could be's" out of this conversation and lets stick to what we can see? Trying to keep assumptions down to a bare minimum if possible. I have seen factory overclocked 7900GT's at 600/1650 which is very impressive for a warrantied card. At these speeds, the 7900GT's are knocking at the performance door of the 7900GTX which default is 650/1600.
I have not seen any mention of pumped up voltages on those cards. Yet.


 

5150Joker

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2002
5,549
0
71
www.techinferno.com
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: nib95
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
I suppose it would if the cores are not speed binned and the memory is the same.


AFAIK the memory used for 7900 GT's is 1.4ns so it's unlikely they'll come close to OC'ing as good as a GTX that has 1.1ns memory and probably higher voltage as well.


I'm sure they could, because I've already seen an XFX 7900 GT XXX Extreme version that is factory OC'd to 560/1650 with the stock cooler. thats already faster memory then the stock 7900 GTX memory speeds.
Now imagine what it could do with an aftermarket cooler?

I'm guessing 600/1700.
Maybe even more on the core, who knows.


The factory OC'd cards could be running on higher voltages. I really doubt a standard GT will hit 1700 mhz on the memory if it has 1.4ns. When you get your GT's let us know though. BTW if you have the balls, here's a voltmod for the 7900: http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=3330

Joker, can we keep the "could be's" out of this conversation and lets stick to what we can see? Trying to keep assumptions down to a bare minimum if possible. I have seen factory overclocked 7900GT's at 600/1650 which is very impressive for a warrantied card.
I have not seen any mention of pumped up voltages on those cards. Yet.



Factory OC'd is very different than buying a standard GT and expecting the same OC out of the memory. Of course there is going to be speculation if he's buying a standard GT and wondering about how far it will OC.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,219
55
91
YMMV of course, but its looking promising if so many vendors are offering this highly clocked cards at first release.
And, it may just be worth it to buy the factory o/c'd versions for damn near 7900GTX performance for 350.00 bucks. You're still paying at least 150.00 bucks less for essentially the same card. (performance wise).
 

5150Joker

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2002
5,549
0
71
www.techinferno.com
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
YMMV of course, but its looking promising if so many vendors are offering this highly clocked cards at first release.


Well it's no different than the KO editions were when the 7800 first launched. They had very little OC room left in them using a standard bios (the one w/delta clocks intact.) I'm not saying he won't be able to match the factory OC'd GT's but that there is always a possiblity those factory OC'd cards have something different about them:

1. speed binned modules.
2. relaxed timings.
3. higher voltages.

I don't think factory OC'd ones are worth the extra $50, it would be better to just add in a bit more extra cash and go for a GTX which would give him a lot more OC headroom.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,219
55
91
It's an extra 50.00. Not 100.00.

XFX 550/1630 goes for 349.00.
Single slot cooler.
XFX 560/1650 goes for 359.00
Spend an additional 25 bucks for the Arctic Silencer and I bet we can see higher clocks than that.
 

nib95

Senior member
Jan 31, 2006
997
0
0
No way am I messing with the actual physical characteristics of the board, I dont really want to use any voltmodding either.
I'll see what i can get on stock volts but with aftermarket coolers.

3DGuru managed 545/1568 OC on stock cooling and voltage. Remember, on stock cooling, the rams are'nt even cooled by a heatsink AT ALL!!
So I doubt the 1.4ns ram makes that much of a negative impact.
I reckon 1600mhz memory might be easily do'able with aftermarket cooling.

http://www.guru3d.com/article/Videocards/326/22/
 

5150Joker

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2002
5,549
0
71
www.techinferno.com
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
It's an extra 50.00. Not 100.00.

XFX 550/1630 goes for 349.00.
Single slot cooler.
XFX 560/1650 goes for 359.00
Spend an additional 25 bucks for the Arctic Silencer and I bet we can see higher clocks than that.


Ah my bad, ok $50 + $25 for the cooler is still a lot of extra cash vs. just getting a GTX for ~$100+ more than the OC'd ones and getting a much better stock cooler w/it and a lot greater OC headroom.
 

5150Joker

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2002
5,549
0
71
www.techinferno.com
Originally posted by: nib95
No way am I messing with the actual physical characteristics of the board, I dont really want to use any voltmodding either.
I'll see what i can get on stock volts but with aftermarket coolers.

3DGuru managed 545/1568 OC on stock cooling and voltage. Remember, on stock cooling, the rams are'nt even cooled by a heatsink AT ALL!!
So I doubt the 1.4ns ram makes that much of a negative impact.
I reckon 1600mhz memory might be easily do'able with aftermarket cooling.


When you get your cards, keep your core stock and then OC your memory and benchmark it against your card stock to see if you get a big increase.
 

nib95

Senior member
Jan 31, 2006
997
0
0
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
It's an extra 50.00. Not 100.00.

XFX 550/1630 goes for 349.00.
Single slot cooler.
XFX 560/1650 goes for 359.00
Spend an additional 25 bucks for the Arctic Silencer and I bet we can see higher clocks than that.


Ah my bad, ok $50 + $25 for the cooler is still a lot of extra cash vs. just getting a GTX for ~$100+ more than the OC'd ones and getting a much better stock cooler w/it and a lot greater OC headroom.


Perhaps, but in the UK the 7900 GTX is roughly £400.

I paid £223 each for my 7900 GT's.
Thats nearly half the price of a 7900 GTX, so the choice was a no brainer.
SLI FTW! :p
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: dug777
It drives me up the wall with my 6600GT :p

a personal issue perhaps, but damn it's annoying :p

Its present with both vendors off in the distance if you look for it, if it is substantially worse with the 7000 series i wouldnt know, havent seen one in action yet.

I would like to see a world with no LOD falloff at all, then you dont have to worry about bands of crap filtering, its all the same.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,219
55
91
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
It's an extra 50.00. Not 100.00.

XFX 550/1630 goes for 349.00.
Single slot cooler.
XFX 560/1650 goes for 359.00
Spend an additional 25 bucks for the Arctic Silencer and I bet we can see higher clocks than that.


Ah my bad, ok $50 + $25 for the cooler is still a lot of extra cash vs. just getting a GTX for ~$100+ more than the OC'd ones and getting a much better stock cooler w/it and a lot greater OC headroom.

It is, but it's probably best to put it in perspective. with the extra 50.00 + 25.00, we would still be about 125.00 cheaper than a 7900GTX. 125.00 is nothing to sneeze at.

 
Jun 14, 2003
10,442
0
0
Originally posted by: framerateuk
I noticed shimmering while playing Morrowind last night on my 2405FPW.

Saying that, i also notice colour banding on photoshop using certiain lighting filters too.


the banding will be the monitors fault
 
Jun 14, 2003
10,442
0
0
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: SolMiester
I have 6600GT Dug & no shimmering! What games are you playing & how much have you drunk at time of 'shimmering'...lol

It's pretty bad on vegitation in Colin Mcrae 04, really noticeable in CS:S (perhaps the worst offender) & hl2, very bad on vegitation in Farcry, not too bad in FEAR, shocking in GTA3 Vice City (where it really annoys me since i can basically max the AA/AF and still get silky smooth FPS, but the shimmeriing is still there :p)...

that's all i'm really playing atm. I just tend to ignore it after i get drunk, so that helps i suppose ;)


CS:s shimmers like crazy....even on my brothers 9500pro and a CRT.