Sheehan: Memo to Drudge- It's Not About Me..

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
I'm interested in knowing how she could've gone about this without "making it about herself".

I don't think she could have once she started. You see, when someone seeks out media attention and then proceeds to make comments about herself and her family(ie: their supposed support) she made the focus about herself. She can try all she wants to change it now but she broke the dam.

 

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
Non-partisan?
OK, so let me get this straight - all she wanted is to verbally assult Bush about how he "murdered" her son, but yet now she's going after Delay? Seems to me that this whole house of cards she's built is crumbling down and her true nature is now more than evident. She's bought into the mainstream left's propaganda and now is hitting on any and all talking points she can.

Can we now finally put to rest this asinine notion that sheehan was just doing this to get to talk to Bush about her son? I can't wait until the press starts ignoring here like they should have as soon as the usual suspects showed up and started choreograph things.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,808
6,362
126
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Non-partisan?
OK, so let me get this straight - all she wanted is to verbally assult Bush about how he "murdered" her son, but yet now she's going after Delay? Seems to me that this whole house of cards she's built is crumbling down and her true nature is now more than evident. She's bought into the mainstream left's propaganda and now is hitting on any and all talking points she can.

Can we now finally put to rest this asinine notion that sheehan was just doing this to get to talk to Bush about her son? I can't wait until the press starts ignoring here like they should have as soon as the usual suspects showed up and started choreograph things.

:roll:
 

judasmachine

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2002
8,515
3
81
for the love of your silly heavenly babysitter let her go into the night peacefully. if you ignore her, she may not go away but we don't have to listen to her and her idiot opponents anymore!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111eleventy
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Non-partisan?
OK, so let me get this straight - all she wanted is to verbally assult Bush about how he "murdered" her son, but yet now she's going after Delay? Seems to me that this whole house of cards she's built is crumbling down and her true nature is now more than evident. She's bought into the mainstream left's propaganda and now is hitting on any and all talking points she can.

Can we now finally put to rest this asinine notion that sheehan was just doing this to get to talk to Bush about her son? I can't wait until the press starts ignoring here like they should have as soon as the usual suspects showed up and started choreograph things.

:thumbsup: Good for her! You can keep attacking the messenger all you want and even if the neocons are successful in making her go away (pst, which by the way you won't), the fire has already been lit.

Time to secure the country and bring our troops home. Thank you Cindy, you are a great American!
 

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Non-partisan?
OK, so let me get this straight - all she wanted is to verbally assult Bush about how he "murdered" her son, but yet now she's going after Delay? Seems to me that this whole house of cards she's built is crumbling down and her true nature is now more than evident. She's bought into the mainstream left's propaganda and now is hitting on any and all talking points she can.

Can we now finally put to rest this asinine notion that sheehan was just doing this to get to talk to Bush about her son? I can't wait until the press starts ignoring here like they should have as soon as the usual suspects showed up and started choreograph things.

:thumbsup: Good for her! You can keep attacking the messenger all you want and even if the neocons are successful in making her go away (pst, which by the way you won't), the fire has already been lit.

Time to secure the country and bring our troops home. Thank you Cindy, you are a great American!

The messenger is irrelevant(she could be Jane Fonda for all I care) and not being attacked(although she brought the spotlight on herself) - her "message" is though. The "messege" has developed into much more than just a greiving mother trying to make hersolf feel better by taking her anger out on Bush. It's developed into a wide ranging collection of the usual "messages" of the left(some of which used to be shunned by the mainstream left and relegated to the extremist edge but now seem to be embraced by them) So I agree, attacking her isn't going to make her go away but that's not what is happening - her "message" is being exposed for what it is - extremist(now seemingly embraced by the mainstream left though).

You can prop her up as a "great American" but I thought she wasn't the issue here according to you. You say she shouldn't be attacked(and she isn't) yet you make claims about her being a great American. Nice setup but the bait stinks and is easily recognized. You are entitled to think of her what you wish but the message sheehan and her gaggle expouse are fair game for critique and highlighting.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
I am very happy that someone finally got the attention from the media that the anti war crowd deserved. Only good things can come from this! There have been enough pro war-pro hate everything that is not American in the media to last for 100 wars. We are but residents of the earth and it is a great day in America when people are finally waking up and seeing this war for what it is. I predict a career in politics for Ms. Sheehan, she lives in a big beautiful blue state. We need more honest to goodness Americans in office who actually care about OUR people!

:thumbsup:
 

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
Originally posted by: umbrella39
I am very happy that someone finally got the attention from the media that the anti war crowd deserved. Only good things can come from this! There have been enough pro war-pro hate everything that is not American in the media to last for 100 wars. We are but residents of the earth and it is a great day in America when people are finally waking up and seeing this war for what it is. I predict a career in politics for Ms. Sheehan, she lives in a big beautiful blue state. We need more honest to goodness Americans in office who actually care about OUR people!

:thumbsup:

There you go with that stink-bait. You can try to talk her(personally) up in hopes that someone responds by attack her so you can then parade around the notion of her being attacked but it's not going to work on me. You have your opinion of her and what she personally cares for but I'll stick to the message I see her and her gaggle put out day after day.

As for the anti-war crowd "finally" getting attention? HAHA!!! have you been hiding under a rock? The media has been giving them more credit than they deserve for quite some time. Do you need to be reminded that the past election cycle was almost all about the war?
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
The anti-war movement needed momentum and a voice and it got it in the form of Ms. Cindy Sheehan! It really is too bad she is not attractive or she would be getting all the face time her and her heart wrenching story deserves. Casey is smiling down on his mother right now. Bless you Cindy for trying to make sure not another mother has to have their child die for the big red machine. :thumbsup:
 

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
Originally posted by: umbrella39
The anti-war movement needed momentum and a voice and it got it in the form of Ms. Cindy Sheehan! It really is too bad she is not attractive or she would be getting all the face time her and her heart wrenching story deserves. Casey is smiling down on his mother right now. Bless you Cindy for trying to make sure not another mother has to have their child die for the big red machine. :thumbsup:

Again, nothing but stink-bait. YOU seem to want to make this about her by endlessly praising her yet you don't think people should attack her. Quite the intellectually honest position you've set up.:roll:
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Non-partisan?
OK, so let me get this straight - all she wanted is to verbally assult Bush about how he "murdered" her son, but yet now she's going after Delay? Seems to me that this whole house of cards she's built is crumbling down and her true nature is now more than evident. She's bought into the mainstream left's propaganda and now is hitting on any and all talking points she can.

Can we now finally put to rest this asinine notion that sheehan was just doing this to get to talk to Bush about her son? I can't wait until the press starts ignoring here like they should have as soon as the usual suspects showed up and started choreograph things.

:thumbsup: Good for her! You can keep attacking the messenger all you want and even if the neocons are successful in making her go away (pst, which by the way you won't), the fire has already been lit.

Time to secure the country and bring our troops home. Thank you Cindy, you are a great American!

Unless she lives in Delay's district she has no authority or influence here.
 

Busithoth

Golden Member
Sep 28, 2003
1,561
0
76
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Non-partisan?
OK, so let me get this straight - all she wanted is to verbally assult Bush about how he "murdered" her son, but yet now she's going after Delay? Seems to me that this whole house of cards she's built is crumbling down and her true nature is now more than evident. She's bought into the mainstream left's propaganda and now is hitting on any and all talking points she can.

Can we now finally put to rest this asinine notion that sheehan was just doing this to get to talk to Bush about her son? I can't wait until the press starts ignoring here like they should have as soon as the usual suspects showed up and started choreograph things.

Please market your Cool-Aid. If you could guarantee results (lock-step Bush-filching adoration of policy) you would make millions. How is it you see Sheehan's house of cards crumbling but not the administration's case for war, or assessment of it's progress? Let's say you get your way, and she's wiped off the earth today. The other gold-star moms are still there. Then there's still that niggling detail of the truth coming out.

My respect for Ms. Sheehan has been in her ability to garner this much attention, and her proven ability to try to keep the focus on the issue. She's debunked dozens of false accusations, but there's always going to be another set incoming. I only wish the Liberals had blood-thirsty slimeballs to subvert the grandstanding of neo-cons.

And you should wait until Bush is off vacation if you want the press to fall off Ms. Sheehan. They're all sitting around doing zip until he gets back to Washington, so it's practically like shooting fish in a barrell (one of Bush's making, BTW).

Also, I don't recall Ms. Sheehan declaring she herself is non-partisan.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: Busithoth
Also, I don't recall Ms. Sheehan declaring she herself is non-partisan.

Let's check out a few quotes from Ms. Sheehan ...

"This country isn't worth dying for..."
"Bush is the biggest terrorist..."
"Bush is a fascist..."
"Bush is a lying bastard..."
"Bush is a Fuhrer..."

 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,808
6,362
126
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Busithoth
Also, I don't recall Ms. Sheehan declaring she herself is non-partisan.

Let's check out a few quotes from Ms. Sheehan ...

"This country isn't worth dying for..."
"Bush is the biggest terrorist..."
"Bush is a fascist..."
"Bush is a lying bastard..."
"Bush is a Fuhrer..."

Links of those in the context they were stated. The first quote has been taken way out of context(she was speaking of Iraq), the others I haven't seen at all.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
He knows by now she was talking about Iraq when she said this country was not dying for. And all the other things are also quotes of hers from her speach in April of this year at SFSU.

All true by the way. I like her more and more every time a Bushfanboi posts her quotes. She has a good head on her shoulders :thumbsup:

My personal favorite of hers:

"George Bush and his band of neo-cons and their neo-con agenda killed my son. And I?ll never, ever, ever forget."

Nor will we Cindy, nor will we. :thumbsup:
 

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
Originally posted by: Busithoth
Also, I don't recall Ms. Sheehan declaring she herself is non-partisan.

The "mainstream" media had been trying to suggest it as have some of her apologists. Al Sharpton was on the tube yipping about how he's going to go join her, but he didn't know of(or just wanted to ignore) her inflamatory extremist rhetoric. It's like some people don't want to know what she stands for and won't accept the fact that she's an extremist. My take on it is that the extremist "message" has now become acceptable to the "mainstream" left and media in this country. How else would you explain it? Umbrella39 for the most part seems to be part of the mainstream left(atleast in the posts I've read of his) but yet he's latched onto this sheehan circus and just loves her anti-neocon(meaning jew - but they won't admit that) extremist rhetoric. He even lauds it. Now is he becoming extreme or has the extreme message been accepted by the "mainstream"?
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: Busithoth
Also, I don't recall Ms. Sheehan declaring she herself is non-partisan.

The "mainstream" media had been trying to suggest it as have some of her apologists. Al Sharpton was on the tube yipping about how he's going to go join her, but he didn't know of(or just wanted to ignore) her inflamatory extremist rhetoric. It's like some people don't want to know what she stands for and won't accept the fact that she's an extremist. My take on it is that the extremist "message" has now become acceptable to the "mainstream" left and media in this country. How else would you explain it? Umbrella39 for the most part seems to be part of the mainstream left(atleast in the posts I've read of his) but yet he's latched onto this sheehan circus and just loves her anti-neocon(meaning jew - but they won't admit that) extremist rhetoric. He even lauds it. Now is he becoming extreme or has the extreme message been accepted by the "mainstream"?

Extremist rhetoric? You people are such a joke. You have NOTHING but lies and bullsh*t against her. Just goes to show what kind of people the Bush-apologists are.
 

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
So, is this the "message" you applaud Umbrella39, others? Is this what the "mainstream" left of our country embraces for their "message"?

sheehan's message
I finally figured out George Bush's NEW reason for staying in Iraq. This reason has also been co-opted by the Move America Forward and the poor mothers who would be honored if their sons were killed in George Bush's war for greed and power.

Since the Freedom and Democracy thing is not going so well and the Iraqi parliament is having such a hard time writing their constitution, since violence is mounting against Iraqis and Americans and since his poll numbers are going down everyday, he had to come up with something.

I have continually asked George Bush to quit using Casey's name and the names of the other Gold Star Families for Peace loved ones to justify his continued killing. He continues to say this: "We have to honor the sacrifices of the fallen by completing the mission." So the mission is now this: WE MUST CONTINUE KILLING AMERICANS BECAUSE AMERICANS HAVE ALREADY BEEN KILLED!!!

How can anyone, anyone in their right minds support this line of reasoning? I have been silent on the Gold Star Moms who still support this man and his war by saying that they deserve the right to their opinions because they are in as much pain as I am. I would challenge them, though, at this point to start thinking for themselves. Iraq DID NOT have WMD; Iraq WAS NOT linked to Al Qaeda and 9/11; Iraq WAS NOT a threat or danger to America. How can these moms who still support George Bush and his insane war in Iraq want more innocent blood shed just because their sons or daughters have been killed? I don't understand it. I don't understand how any mother could want another mother to feel the pain we feel. I am starting to lose a little compassion for them. I know they have been as brainwashed as the rest of America, but they know the pain and heartache and they should not wish it on another. However, I still feel their pain so acutely and pray for these "continue the murder and mayhem" moms to see the light.

Quite a "mainstream" message we have here, wouldn't you agree? I wonder if those who stated "YOU SPEAK FOR ME, CINDY!" in the other thread agree with the extreme "message" above.
 

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: Busithoth
Also, I don't recall Ms. Sheehan declaring she herself is non-partisan.

The "mainstream" media had been trying to suggest it as have some of her apologists. Al Sharpton was on the tube yipping about how he's going to go join her, but he didn't know of(or just wanted to ignore) her inflamatory extremist rhetoric. It's like some people don't want to know what she stands for and won't accept the fact that she's an extremist. My take on it is that the extremist "message" has now become acceptable to the "mainstream" left and media in this country. How else would you explain it? Umbrella39 for the most part seems to be part of the mainstream left(atleast in the posts I've read of his) but yet he's latched onto this sheehan circus and just loves her anti-neocon(meaning jew - but they won't admit that) extremist rhetoric. He even lauds it. Now is he becoming extreme or has the extreme message been accepted by the "mainstream"?

Extremist rhetoric? You people are such a joke. You have NOTHING but lies and bullsh*t against her. Just goes to show what kind of people the Bush-apologists are.

Yes umbrella39 - extremist. Take note of the "message" your hero is shoveling today. Come back(with a straight face) and make the case that it wasn't extremist.
"continue the murder and mayhem" moms" isn't extremist?
"I know they have been as brainwashed as the rest of America" isn't extremist?
"How can these moms ... want more innocent blood shed just because their sons or daughters have been killed?" isn't extremist?
Don't mind her insane "logic" put forth in the first part of her "message" (it's the second bolded part)

We won't even go into the previous "messages" put forth by "mother":roll: sheehan and her gaggle.

Yep, all lies and bullsh*t :roll: Don't mind it's direct quotes(in context) straight from your hero's mouth. Yep, quite telling indeed.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
She is in a word, AWESOME. Though I do feel that someone is now writing her speeches for her.

"We have to honor the sacrifices of the fallen by completing the mission" is like saying"

"We have to honor those killed in car crashes by removing all seat belts".

What logic! Bush is a terrorist and Sheehan is an American hero.

:thumbsup:
 

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
Originally posted by: umbrella39
She is in a word, AWESOME. Though I do feel that someone is now writing her speeches for her.

"We have to honor the sacrifices of the fallen by completing the mission" is like saying"

"We have to honor those killed in car crashes by removing all seat belts".

What logic! Bush is a terrorist and Sheehan is an American hero.

:thumbsup:

My take on it is that the extremist "message" has now become acceptable to the "mainstream" left and media in this country. How else would you explain it? Umbrella39 for the most part seems to be part of the mainstream left(atleast in the posts I've read of his) but yet he's latched onto this sheehan circus and just loves her anti-neocon(meaning jew - but they won't admit that) extremist rhetoric. He even lauds it. Now is he becoming extreme or has the extreme message been accepted by the "mainstream"?

Hmm.
Bush is a terrorist?
Doesn't sound extremist to me. ;)

Maybe the answer to my question = Both.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Well 19 hijackers were responsible for the deaths of 3,000 or so Americans.

One man has been responsible for adding nearly 2,000 to that toll. Thank God there are not 18 more George Bushs.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
so you say that we and the media should be ignoring this woman... and yet you keep posting about her in this thread.

:confused:
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
So, is this the "message" you applaud Umbrella39, others? Is this what the "mainstream" left of our country embraces for their "message"?

sheehan's message
I finally figured out George Bush's NEW reason for staying in Iraq. This reason has also been co-opted by the Move America Forward and the poor mothers who would be honored if their sons were killed in George Bush's war for greed and power.

Since the Freedom and Democracy thing is not going so well and the Iraqi parliament is having such a hard time writing their constitution, since violence is mounting against Iraqis and Americans and since his poll numbers are going down everyday, he had to come up with something.

I have continually asked George Bush to quit using Casey's name and the names of the other Gold Star Families for Peace loved ones to justify his continued killing. He continues to say this: "We have to honor the sacrifices of the fallen by completing the mission." So the mission is now this: WE MUST CONTINUE KILLING AMERICANS BECAUSE AMERICANS HAVE ALREADY BEEN KILLED!!!

How can anyone, anyone in their right minds support this line of reasoning? I have been silent on the Gold Star Moms who still support this man and his war by saying that they deserve the right to their opinions because they are in as much pain as I am. I would challenge them, though, at this point to start thinking for themselves. Iraq DID NOT have WMD; Iraq WAS NOT linked to Al Qaeda and 9/11; Iraq WAS NOT a threat or danger to America. How can these moms who still support George Bush and his insane war in Iraq want more innocent blood shed just because their sons or daughters have been killed? I don't understand it. I don't understand how any mother could want another mother to feel the pain we feel. I am starting to lose a little compassion for them. I know they have been as brainwashed as the rest of America, but they know the pain and heartache and they should not wish it on another. However, I still feel their pain so acutely and pray for these "continue the murder and mayhem" moms to see the light.

Quite a "mainstream" message we have here, wouldn't you agree? I wonder if those who stated "YOU SPEAK FOR ME, CINDY!" in the other thread agree with the extreme "message" above.

1) Cindy never said she spoke for anyone else
2) She's right. Sending more to die because others have died? WTF? *That's* the noble cause? Or is the noble cause spread theocracy
3) The extremists at this protest are the paid shills from the alleged grassroots group, Move America Forward is actually a front for a GOP PR firm
4) Remember Safia Taleb al-Souhail? She was the Iraqi the Propagandist exploited during his State of the Union address earlier this year (she was the one sitting next to the First Lady). Well, she seems to be singing a different tune now that women's rights has taken a back seat to
democ...er...theocracy.
5) Check out the "throngs" of pro-war supporters in Crawford.
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
Originally posted by: loki8481
so you say that we and the media should be ignoring this woman... and yet you keep posting about her in this thread.

:confused:

It's the latest obsession for the Right. The goal is to deflect attention from the realities of their failed war in Iraq and other policy failures.