Sheehan: Memo to Drudge- It's Not About Me..

[conjur]

More pics:

Pro-war tent

Sheehan supporters tent

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: loki8481
so you say that we and the media should be ignoring this woman... and yet you keep posting about her in this thread.

:roll: Is the media ignoring her? I'm not the one keeping her story alive, I'm not the media.

Tired of seeing her extremist message on display?

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
So, is this the "message" you applaud Umbrella39, others? Is this what the "mainstream" left of our country embraces for their "message"?

sheehan's message

I finally figured out George Bush's NEW reason for staying in Iraq. This reason has also been co-opted by the Move America Forward and the poor mothers who would be honored if their sons were killed in George Bush's war for greed and power.

Since the Freedom and Democracy thing is not going so well and the Iraqi parliament is having such a hard time writing their constitution, since violence is mounting against Iraqis and Americans and since his poll numbers are going down everyday, he had to come up with something.

I have continually asked George Bush to quit using Casey's name and the names of the other Gold Star Families for Peace loved ones to justify his continued killing. He continues to say this: "We have to honor the sacrifices of the fallen by completing the mission." So the mission is now this: WE MUST CONTINUE KILLING AMERICANS BECAUSE AMERICANS HAVE ALREADY BEEN KILLED!!!

How can anyone, anyone in their right minds support this line of reasoning? I have been silent on the Gold Star Moms who still support this man and his war by saying that they deserve the right to their opinions because they are in as much pain as I am. I would challenge them, though, at this point to start thinking for themselves. Iraq DID NOT have WMD; Iraq WAS NOT linked to Al Qaeda and 9/11; Iraq WAS NOT a threat or danger to America. How can these moms who still support George Bush and his insane war in Iraq want more innocent blood shed just because their sons or daughters have been killed? I don't understand it. I don't understand how any mother could want another mother to feel the pain we feel. I am starting to lose a little compassion for them. I know they have been as brainwashed as the rest of America, but they know the pain and heartache and they should not wish it on another. However, I still feel their pain so acutely and pray for these "continue the murder and mayhem" moms to see the light.

Quite a "mainstream" message we have here, wouldn't you agree? I wonder if those who stated "YOU SPEAK FOR ME, CINDY!" in the other thread agree with the extreme "message" above.

1) Cindy never said she spoke for anyone else
2) She's right. Sending more to die because others have died? WTF? *That's* the noble cause? Or is the noble cause spread theocracy
3) The extremists at this protest are the paid shills from the alleged grassroots group, Move America Forward is actually a front for a GOP PR firm
4) Remember Safia Taleb al-Souhail? She was the Iraqi the Propagandist exploited during his State of the Union address earlier this year (she was the one sitting next to the First Lady). Well, she seems to be singing a different tune now that women's rights has taken a back seat to
democ...er...theocracy.
5) Check out the "throngs" of pro-war supporters in Crawford.

People in the other threads are saying she does. "YOU SPEAK FOR ME, CINDY!" is a direct quote from Harvey which was copied by others.

We aren't sending more because others have died - the premise is false on it's face.

And they acknowledge their funding whereas sheehan and her gaggle don't seem to want to talk about it. Although we know that MoveOn has been doing some sponsoring, plus we know who funds the other radical groups that have joined her.

And? Aren't you part of the crowd that whines about that we shouldn't push our Democracy on people? Well, we can't force them to copy our ways immediately, but your characterization about women's rights is more than a bit misleading. It is patently false that women have less rights now than they did before so don't even try to make that claim.

Real pics of counter-protestors

Cindy getting prepared for her scheduled emotional tirade for the media Anyone know who's sat truck that is? PSSI?

Part of her "message" and gaggle

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: conjur
More pics:

Pro-war tent

Sheehan supporters tent

:roll:

Let me have a try at this blatant dishonesty.

anti-war camp casey

Counter Protesters

Wow, funny how that works. :roll:

 

[umbrella39]

LOL, there is nothing as comical to me in this country as when "protesters" go and protest other protesters. Whether it is the anti abortion crowd or in this case, the pro-war-monger movement. :laugh: The bushwarfanbois are feeling the pressure and responding on cue like good little actors. :thumbsup:

 

[catnap1972]

Originally posted by: umbrella39
LOL, there is nothing as comical to me in this country as when "protesters" go and protest other protesters. Whether it is the anti abortion crowd or in this case, the pro-war-monger movement. :laugh: The bushwarfanbois are feeling the pressure and responding on cue like good little actors. :thumbsup:

That and a little monetary compensation (courtesy of the Pillsbury Dough Boy aka Rove) :laugh:

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: catnap1972

Originally posted by: umbrella39
LOL, there is nothing as comical to me in this country as when "protesters" go and protest other protesters. Whether it is the anti abortion crowd or in this case, the pro-war-monger movement. :laugh: The bushwarfanbois are feeling the pressure and responding on cue like good little actors. :thumbsup:

That and a little monetary compensation (courtesy of the Pillsbury Dough Boy aka Rove) :laugh:

Ya, isn't it amazing that these protestors had to be shipped in by a Republican PR firm like cattle. MOOOOO.

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: umbrella39
LOL, there is nothing as comical to me in this country as when "protesters" go and protest other protesters. Whether it is the anti abortion crowd or in this case, the pro-war-monger movement. :laugh: The bushwarfanbois are feeling the pressure and responding on cue like good little actors. :thumbsup:

You say it's comical for those who support Bush to come down to Crawford yet you don't say the same for sheehan's gaggle? Oh that's right, only dissent and hate are protected by Free Speech according to the left - how dare those supporters actually gather to express their positive support.

It's funny you used the word "actors". Did you not read my post above? What's with the unaffiliated sat truck and the makeup people for cindy. You do realize her little daily cry session is staged infront of the media right?
"actors" alright.

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: catnap1972

Originally posted by: umbrella39
LOL, there is nothing as comical to me in this country as when "protesters" go and protest other protesters. Whether it is the anti abortion crowd or in this case, the pro-war-monger movement. :laugh: The bushwarfanbois are feeling the pressure and responding on cue like good little actors. :thumbsup:

That and a little monetary compensation (courtesy of the Pillsbury Dough Boy aka Rove) :laugh:

Ya, isn't it amazing that these protestors had to be shipped in by a Republican PR firm like cattle. MOOOOO.

Yeah, sort of like those from MOOOOOOveOn. Don't lie to yourselves - there is plenty of leftist money backing sheehan's gaggle. I hear they have catering now.

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: catnap1972

Originally posted by: umbrella39
LOL, there is nothing as comical to me in this country as when "protesters" go and protest other protesters. Whether it is the anti abortion crowd or in this case, the pro-war-monger movement. :laugh: The bushwarfanbois are feeling the pressure and responding on cue like good little actors. :thumbsup:

That and a little monetary compensation (courtesy of the Pillsbury Dough Boy aka Rove) :laugh:

Ya, isn't it amazing that these protestors had to be shipped in by a Republican PR firm like cattle. MOOOOO.

Yeah, sort of like those from MOOOOOOveOn. Don't lie to yourselves - there is plenty of leftist money backing sheehan's gaggle. I hear they have catering now.

You better get some of your moldy money sent out so the war mongers can have catering too. You don't want those nasty liberals to one up you again, now do you??

 

Bin Laden :heart: Cindy

 

[imported_tss4]

Dude, the extreme on both sides are the opnes that get media time. That's why I'm always Sheehan and her posse on TV for the left and these crazy conservative chrsitian groups (protetesting that John Roberts isn't conservative enough cause he was once on a case that involved a gay for 20 minutes) for the right. The squecky wheel gets the attention. And the mainstream moderate isn't squeky. Go check out the nutcases in this thread.

Anti-gay church protests at GI's funerals

Yeap, its the extreme on the right that gets the attention too. The right will bolster behind groups like that but there's no way they really represent the complete attitude of the right. Same with Sheehan. Sure she's a symbol for the left. But if you walked out and talked to your average liberal they wouldn't be saying the same thing she is.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
So, is this the "message" you applaud Umbrella39, others? Is this what the "mainstream" left of our country embraces for their "message"?

sheehan's message

I finally figured out George Bush's NEW reason for staying in Iraq. This reason has also been co-opted by the Move America Forward and the poor mothers who would be honored if their sons were killed in George Bush's war for greed and power.

Since the Freedom and Democracy thing is not going so well and the Iraqi parliament is having such a hard time writing their constitution, since violence is mounting against Iraqis and Americans and since his poll numbers are going down everyday, he had to come up with something.

I have continually asked George Bush to quit using Casey's name and the names of the other Gold Star Families for Peace loved ones to justify his continued killing. He continues to say this: "We have to honor the sacrifices of the fallen by completing the mission." So the mission is now this: WE MUST CONTINUE KILLING AMERICANS BECAUSE AMERICANS HAVE ALREADY BEEN KILLED!!!

How can anyone, anyone in their right minds support this line of reasoning? I have been silent on the Gold Star Moms who still support this man and his war by saying that they deserve the right to their opinions because they are in as much pain as I am. I would challenge them, though, at this point to start thinking for themselves. Iraq DID NOT have WMD; Iraq WAS NOT linked to Al Qaeda and 9/11; Iraq WAS NOT a threat or danger to America. How can these moms who still support George Bush and his insane war in Iraq want more innocent blood shed just because their sons or daughters have been killed? I don't understand it. I don't understand how any mother could want another mother to feel the pain we feel. I am starting to lose a little compassion for them. I know they have been as brainwashed as the rest of America, but they know the pain and heartache and they should not wish it on another. However, I still feel their pain so acutely and pray for these "continue the murder and mayhem" moms to see the light.

Quite a "mainstream" message we have here, wouldn't you agree? I wonder if those who stated "YOU SPEAK FOR ME, CINDY!" in the other thread agree with the extreme "message" above.

1) Cindy never said she spoke for anyone else
2) She's right. Sending more to die because others have died? WTF? *That's* the noble cause? Or is the noble cause spread theocracy
3) The extremists at this protest are the paid shills from the alleged grassroots group, Move America Forward is actually a front for a GOP PR firm
4) Remember Safia Taleb al-Souhail? She was the Iraqi the Propagandist exploited during his State of the Union address earlier this year (she was the one sitting next to the First Lady). Well, she seems to be singing a different tune now that women's rights has taken a back seat to
democ...er...theocracy.
5) Check out the "throngs" of pro-war supporters in Crawford.

People in the other threads are saying she does. "YOU SPEAK FOR ME, CINDY!" is a direct quote from Harvey which was copied by others.

We aren't sending more because others have died - the premise is false on it's face.

And they acknowledge their funding whereas sheehan and her gaggle don't seem to want to talk about it. Although we know that MoveOn has been doing some sponsoring, plus we know who funds the other radical groups that have joined her.

And? Aren't you part of the crowd that whines about that we shouldn't push our Democracy on people? Well, we can't force them to copy our ways immediately, but your characterization about women's rights is more than a bit misleading. It is patently false that women have less rights now than they did before so don't even try to make that claim.

Real pics of counter-protestors

Cindy getting prepared for her scheduled emotional tirade for the media Anyone know who's sat truck that is? PSSI?

Part of her "message" and gaggle

At least the Sheehan supporters are there of their own accord. The pro-war freaks are bussed in from the Russo GOP PR firm. Hell, one chartered bus just an hour or so away from Crawford had to be canceled because only 7 pro-war freaks showed up! :laugh:

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: dwell
Bin Laden :heart: Bush

Fixed

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: dwell
Bin Laden :heart: Cindy

Stupidity :heart: Dwell.

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
So, is this the "message" you applaud Umbrella39, others? Is this what the "mainstream" left of our country embraces for their "message"?

sheehan's message

I finally figured out George Bush's NEW reason for staying in Iraq. This reason has also been co-opted by the Move America Forward and the poor mothers who would be honored if their sons were killed in George Bush's war for greed and power.

Since the Freedom and Democracy thing is not going so well and the Iraqi parliament is having such a hard time writing their constitution, since violence is mounting against Iraqis and Americans and since his poll numbers are going down everyday, he had to come up with something.

I have continually asked George Bush to quit using Casey's name and the names of the other Gold Star Families for Peace loved ones to justify his continued killing. He continues to say this: "We have to honor the sacrifices of the fallen by completing the mission." So the mission is now this: WE MUST CONTINUE KILLING AMERICANS BECAUSE AMERICANS HAVE ALREADY BEEN KILLED!!!

How can anyone, anyone in their right minds support this line of reasoning? I have been silent on the Gold Star Moms who still support this man and his war by saying that they deserve the right to their opinions because they are in as much pain as I am. I would challenge them, though, at this point to start thinking for themselves. Iraq DID NOT have WMD; Iraq WAS NOT linked to Al Qaeda and 9/11; Iraq WAS NOT a threat or danger to America. How can these moms who still support George Bush and his insane war in Iraq want more innocent blood shed just because their sons or daughters have been killed? I don't understand it. I don't understand how any mother could want another mother to feel the pain we feel. I am starting to lose a little compassion for them. I know they have been as brainwashed as the rest of America, but they know the pain and heartache and they should not wish it on another. However, I still feel their pain so acutely and pray for these "continue the murder and mayhem" moms to see the light.

Quite a "mainstream" message we have here, wouldn't you agree? I wonder if those who stated "YOU SPEAK FOR ME, CINDY!" in the other thread agree with the extreme "message" above.

1) Cindy never said she spoke for anyone else
2) She's right. Sending more to die because others have died? WTF? *That's* the noble cause? Or is the noble cause spread theocracy
3) The extremists at this protest are the paid shills from the alleged grassroots group, Move America Forward is actually a front for a GOP PR firm
4) Remember Safia Taleb al-Souhail? She was the Iraqi the Propagandist exploited during his State of the Union address earlier this year (she was the one sitting next to the First Lady). Well, she seems to be singing a different tune now that women's rights has taken a back seat to
democ...er...theocracy.
5) Check out the "throngs" of pro-war supporters in Crawford.

People in the other threads are saying she does. "YOU SPEAK FOR ME, CINDY!" is a direct quote from Harvey which was copied by others.

We aren't sending more because others have died - the premise is false on it's face.

And they acknowledge their funding whereas sheehan and her gaggle don't seem to want to talk about it. Although we know that MoveOn has been doing some sponsoring, plus we know who funds the other radical groups that have joined her.

And? Aren't you part of the crowd that whines about that we shouldn't push our Democracy on people? Well, we can't force them to copy our ways immediately, but your characterization about women's rights is more than a bit misleading. It is patently false that women have less rights now than they did before so don't even try to make that claim.

Real pics of counter-protestors

Cindy getting prepared for her scheduled emotional tirade for the media Anyone know who's sat truck that is? PSSI?

Part of her "message" and gaggle

At least the Sheehan supporters are there of their own accord. The pro-war freaks are bussed in from the Russo GOP PR firm. Hell, one chartered bus just an hour or so away from Crawford had to be canceled because only 7 pro-war freaks showed up! :laugh:

You enjoy posting lies? Bush supporters are there on their own accord too. BTW - you think the one bus was too close and people just decided to go on their own? No, that's too reasonable and rational of an explaination - we must disregard it and insinuate that no one wanted to go. :roll:

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: tss4
Dude, the extreme on both sides are the opnes that get media time. That's why I'm always Sheehan and her posse on TV for the left and these crazy conservative chrsitian groups (protetesting that John Roberts isn't conservative enough cause he was once on a case that involved a gay for 20 minutes) for the right. The squecky wheel gets the attention. And the mainstream moderate isn't squeky. Go check out the nutcases in this thread.

Anti-gay church protests at GI's funerals

Yeap, its the extreme on the right that gets the attention too. The right will bolster behind groups like that but there's no way they really represent the complete attitude of the right. Same with Sheehan. Sure she's a symbol for the left. But if you walked out and talked to your average liberal they wouldn't be saying the same thing she is.

The "mainstream" right does not support that fringe group that bashes gays. However it is looking more and more like the "mainstream" left is embracing sheehan's extremist "message".

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: tss4
Dude, the extreme on both sides are the opnes that get media time. That's why I'm always Sheehan and her posse on TV for the left and these crazy conservative chrsitian groups (protetesting that John Roberts isn't conservative enough cause he was once on a case that involved a gay for 20 minutes) for the right. The squecky wheel gets the attention. And the mainstream moderate isn't squeky. Go check out the nutcases in this thread.

Anti-gay church protests at GI's funerals

Yeap, its the extreme on the right that gets the attention too. The right will bolster behind groups like that but there's no way they really represent the complete attitude of the right. Same with Sheehan. Sure she's a symbol for the left. But if you walked out and talked to your average liberal they wouldn't be saying the same thing she is.

The "mainstream" right does not support that fringe group that bashes gays. However it is looking more and more like the "mainstream" left is embracing sheehan's extremist "message".

So you have a problem with Sheehan?? Gee, that's just too bad, LOL. You'll get over it.....eventually. I find it rather amusing the lengths the "mainstream right" will go to try and neutralize one anti-war protestor.

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: conjur
3) The extremists at this protest are the paid shills from the alleged grassroots group, Move America Forward is actually a front for a GOP PR firm
.

PR Machine Behind Cindy Sheehan?

I wonder if you are ever going to show some intellectual honesty or not.

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: tss4
Dude, the extreme on both sides are the opnes that get media time. That's why I'm always Sheehan and her posse on TV for the left and these crazy conservative chrsitian groups (protetesting that John Roberts isn't conservative enough cause he was once on a case that involved a gay for 20 minutes) for the right. The squecky wheel gets the attention. And the mainstream moderate isn't squeky. Go check out the nutcases in this thread.

Anti-gay church protests at GI's funerals

Yeap, its the extreme on the right that gets the attention too. The right will bolster behind groups like that but there's no way they really represent the complete attitude of the right. Same with Sheehan. Sure she's a symbol for the left. But if you walked out and talked to your average liberal they wouldn't be saying the same thing she is.

The "mainstream" right does not support that fringe group that bashes gays. However it is looking more and more like the "mainstream" left is embracing sheehan's extremist "message".

So you have a problem with Sheehan?? Gee, that's just too bad, LOL. You'll get over it.....eventually. I find it rather amusing the lengths the "mainstream right" will go to try and neutralize one anti-war protestor.

Nope, I don't have a problem with sheehan, she has every right to express herself. That right however does not mean that her message is protected from being shown for the extremist rhetoric it is.
No lengths are needed - it's actually quite easy because her "message" speaks for it's extemist self.

 

[Busithoth]

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: Busithoth
Also, I don't recall Ms. Sheehan declaring she herself is non-partisan.

Let's check out a few quotes from Ms. Sheehan ...

"This country isn't worth dying for..."
"Bush is the biggest terrorist..."
"Bush is a fascist..."
"Bush is a lying bastard..."
"Bush is a Fuhrer..."

I think you missed a negative in my statement.
I never read a statement where she insisted she was non-partisan.

that means you need to pull a quote where she DOES say she's non-partisan to prove she's lying about it.

:roll:

 

[umbrella39]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: umbrella39
LOL, there is nothing as comical to me in this country as when "protesters" go and protest other protesters. Whether it is the anti abortion crowd or in this case, the pro-war-monger movement. :laugh: The bushwarfanbois are feeling the pressure and responding on cue like good little actors. :thumbsup:

You say it's comical for those who support Bush to come down to Crawford yet you don't say the same for sheehan's gaggle? Oh that's right, only dissent and hate are protected by Free Speech according to the left - how dare those supporters actually gather to express their positive support.

It's funny you used the word "actors". Did you not read my post above? What's with the unaffiliated sat truck and the makeup people for cindy. You do realize her little daily cry session is staged infront of the media right?
"actors" alright.

Re-read my post. What are the they protesting? Protesters. No one is telling them they can't be there, nice try at putting words in my mouth. It is just so damn funny when a group protests and another group gathers to protest them.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

And if Cindy is being bankrolled, why is her checking account $1200 overdrawn? If individuals are throwing money at them to stay down there to help recoup/defray costs, it certainly does not mean that someone paid her to go down there in the first place. Got any proof of that? Hell Randi Rhodes had subway subs sent down where there were only 200 protesters in Crawford. Hmm, that damn Jarrod is bankrolling the whole damn thing.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: umbrella39

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: umbrella39
LOL, there is nothing as comical to me in this country as when "protesters" go and protest other protesters. Whether it is the anti abortion crowd or in this case, the pro-war-monger movement. :laugh: The bushwarfanbois are feeling the pressure and responding on cue like good little actors. :thumbsup:

You say it's comical for those who support Bush to come down to Crawford yet you don't say the same for sheehan's gaggle? Oh that's right, only dissent and hate are protected by Free Speech according to the left - how dare those supporters actually gather to express their positive support.

It's funny you used the word "actors". Did you not read my post above? What's with the unaffiliated sat truck and the makeup people for cindy. You do realize her little daily cry session is staged infront of the media right?
"actors" alright.

Re-read my post. What are the they protesting? Protesters. No one is telling them they can't be there, nice try at putting words in my mouth. It is just so damn funny when a group protests and another group gathers to protest them.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

And if Cindy is being bankrolled, why is her checking account $1200 overdrawn? If individuals are throwing money at them to stay down there to help recoup/defray costs, it certainly does not mean that someone paid her to go down there in the first place. Got any proof of that? Hell Randi Rhodes had subway subs sent down where there were only 200 protesters in Crawford. Hmm, that damn Jarrod is bankrolling the whole damn thing.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
The people who are countering the anti-war protesters are Bush Supporters. They are voicing their support of Bush - just like sheehan and her gaggle are voicing their lack of support for Bush. You can spin it or label it whatever you wish but it doesn't change the FACTS. People are going down there to support Bush, and show thier disapproval of sheehan and the other extremist's message. Sounds like I nailed it when I suggested that the left only thinks that negative protesting is valid.

:laugh: - have your read a link I've posted? Here it is again since you clearly didn't take the time to read.
PR Machine Behind Cindy Sheehan?

The funniest part of this whole issue is that there are apologists doing thier best to make excuses for her and fluff up her image to mask her extremist message.

 

[Pabster]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
The people who are countering the anti-war protesters are Bush Supporters. They are voicing their support of Bush - just like sheehan and her gaggle are voicing their lack of support for Bush. You can spin it or label it whatever you wish but it doesn't change the FACTS. People are going down there to support Bush, and show thier disapproval of sheehan and the other extremist's message. Sounds like I nailed it when I suggested that the left only thinks that negative protesting is valid.

Yep, the "You Don't Speak For Me Cindy!" tour is in full swing.

:laugh: - have your read a link I've posted? Here it is again since you clearly didn't take the time to read.
PR Machine Behind Cindy Sheehan?

Don't bother, the liberals here will always spin.

The funniest part of this whole issue is that there are apologists doing thier best to make excuses for her and fluff up her image to mask her extremist message.

Extremist is an understatement.

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: tss4
Dude, the extreme on both sides are the opnes that get media time. That's why I'm always Sheehan and her posse on TV for the left and these crazy conservative chrsitian groups (protetesting that John Roberts isn't conservative enough cause he was once on a case that involved a gay for 20 minutes) for the right. The squecky wheel gets the attention. And the mainstream moderate isn't squeky. Go check out the nutcases in this thread.

Anti-gay church protests at GI's funerals

Yeap, its the extreme on the right that gets the attention too. The right will bolster behind groups like that but there's no way they really represent the complete attitude of the right. Same with Sheehan. Sure she's a symbol for the left. But if you walked out and talked to your average liberal they wouldn't be saying the same thing she is.

The "mainstream" right does not support that fringe group that bashes gays. However it is looking more and more like the "mainstream" left is embracing sheehan's extremist "message".

So you have a problem with Sheehan?? Gee, that's just too bad, LOL. You'll get over it.....eventually. I find it rather amusing the lengths the "mainstream right" will go to try and neutralize one anti-war protestor.

Nope, I don't have a problem with sheehan, she has every right to express herself. That right however does not mean that her message is protected from being shown for the extremist rhetoric it is.
No lengths are needed - it's actually quite easy because her "message" speaks for it's extemist self.

Me thinks you doth protest too much