Corporate Thug
Lifer
- Apr 17, 2003
- 37,622
- 0
- 76
Originally posted by: Syringer
First C-Webb goes back to the west, now Shaq, who's next..Akeem Olajuwon?
David Robinson just signed with the Spurs...
Originally posted by: Syringer
First C-Webb goes back to the west, now Shaq, who's next..Akeem Olajuwon?
The trade represents a dramatic change for the Suns, whose run-and-gun, small-ball style had revolutionized the league in recent seasons.
Originally posted by: trmiv
Apparently Phoenix wants Shaq to stick to rebounding and defending. Aside from being an imposing figure, Shaq has never been a good defender. He doesn't particularly like doing it, and Shaq has said he will not be a token center. Also, Shaq is horrible at defending the pick-and-roll because he NEVER shows. The Suns will get PNR'd to death with Shaq in the lineup. They will get a taste of their own medicine on a nightly basis. Yes he will be better at defending post-players, but I think their overall defense will suffer. Right now he's complaining about "touches" in Miami, so he still clearly sees himself as an offensive threat that needs shots, how is he going to accept being asked to just rebound the ball and play defense? I don't see how it will work. Another thing is, Shaq represents a stark change in offensively philosophy for the Suns. Their offense has been built on scoring in 10 seconds or less, steals, quick outlet passes off rebounds, run run run. Now they will need to become more of a half-court team for Shaq to succeed in their offense. From what I've read D'Antoni doesn't sound particularly enthusiastic about the trade, how is it going to work if your coach isn't buying into it, and has to change his offense to boot?
Originally posted by: Patt
I see it this way ... should the Suns accept Shaq's increasingly fragile body ... he'll only have to run the floor half the time anyway. When Phoenix is fast breaking, he'll be the rebounder/inbounder, and won't be getting himself past halfcourt when they're really running anyway. Add to the fact that the best 'bigs' defenders won't necessarily be able to stick on Amare anymore, and Shaq could pound smaller people in the halfcourt (once he gets there).
Interesting trade ... short term value vs. long term prospects ... but you know Marion was going piss and whine about not being the man anyway. Of course, Phoenix will be the new Miami Heat in a couple of years when Shaq retires, Nash is 36, and someone has lured Barbosa away with large money.
Originally posted by: XMan
Originally posted by: trmiv
Apparently Phoenix wants Shaq to stick to rebounding and defending. Aside from being an imposing figure, Shaq has never been a good defender. He doesn't particularly like doing it, and Shaq has said he will not be a token center. Also, Shaq is horrible at defending the pick-and-roll because he NEVER shows. The Suns will get PNR'd to death with Shaq in the lineup. They will get a taste of their own medicine on a nightly basis. Yes he will be better at defending post-players, but I think their overall defense will suffer. Right now he's complaining about "touches" in Miami, so he still clearly sees himself as an offensive threat that needs shots, how is he going to accept being asked to just rebound the ball and play defense? I don't see how it will work. Another thing is, Shaq represents a stark change in offensively philosophy for the Suns. Their offense has been built on scoring in 10 seconds or less, steals, quick outlet passes off rebounds, run run run. Now they will need to become more of a half-court team for Shaq to succeed in their offense. From what I've read D'Antoni doesn't sound particularly enthusiastic about the trade, how is it going to work if your coach isn't buying into it, and has to change his offense to boot?
PNRs . . . sounds good, but Shaq has never had a weak-side defender who can block shots as well as Amare behind him. Ho Grant? Meh. I can see it now . . . Parker and Duncan PNR around Shaq . . . Parker to the hoop . . . REJECTED by Stoudemire.
Offensive philosopy . . . I disagree, the Suns very rarely fast break with all five players. Shaq can trail. And when the game slows down he can move into the low block. Amare is effective enough from the elbow that he doesn't need the post. And who do you double team? Shaq? Amare? Double team Shaq, he kicks it to Amare, who is stronger than most fours and faster than most fives. I think Amare's scoring will go up significantly with Shaq in the lineup.
And, don't forget the Nash factor. Shaq has never played with a point guard of Nash's caliber. (Wade and Penny aren't true points, IMO). Steve will get him a consistent diet of easy buckets. Same with Hill and Diaw.
Originally posted by: trmiv
Originally posted by: XMan
Originally posted by: trmiv
Apparently Phoenix wants Shaq to stick to rebounding and defending. Aside from being an imposing figure, Shaq has never been a good defender. He doesn't particularly like doing it, and Shaq has said he will not be a token center. Also, Shaq is horrible at defending the pick-and-roll because he NEVER shows. The Suns will get PNR'd to death with Shaq in the lineup. They will get a taste of their own medicine on a nightly basis. Yes he will be better at defending post-players, but I think their overall defense will suffer. Right now he's complaining about "touches" in Miami, so he still clearly sees himself as an offensive threat that needs shots, how is he going to accept being asked to just rebound the ball and play defense? I don't see how it will work. Another thing is, Shaq represents a stark change in offensively philosophy for the Suns. Their offense has been built on scoring in 10 seconds or less, steals, quick outlet passes off rebounds, run run run. Now they will need to become more of a half-court team for Shaq to succeed in their offense. From what I've read D'Antoni doesn't sound particularly enthusiastic about the trade, how is it going to work if your coach isn't buying into it, and has to change his offense to boot?
PNRs . . . sounds good, but Shaq has never had a weak-side defender who can block shots as well as Amare behind him. Ho Grant? Meh. I can see it now . . . Parker and Duncan PNR around Shaq . . . Parker to the hoop . . . REJECTED by Stoudemire.
Offensive philosopy . . . I disagree, the Suns very rarely fast break with all five players. Shaq can trail. And when the game slows down he can move into the low block. Amare is effective enough from the elbow that he doesn't need the post. And who do you double team? Shaq? Amare? Double team Shaq, he kicks it to Amare, who is stronger than most fours and faster than most fives. I think Amare's scoring will go up significantly with Shaq in the lineup.
And, don't forget the Nash factor. Shaq has never played with a point guard of Nash's caliber. (Wade and Penny aren't true points, IMO). Steve will get him a consistent diet of easy buckets. Same with Hill and Diaw.
As successful as the Lakers were with Shaq, his reluctance to play the PNR hurt them on many occasions, especially later in his time with the Lakers. Most notably during the Pistons/Lakers series. Exactly how many shots do you expect Amare to block a game? Amare is an decent weakside shot blocker, but he's not that good. And honestly weakside shot blocking only gets you so far. Denver has the best weakside shot blocker in the game in Camby, yet they are arguably the worst defensive team in the league.
Phoenix is already a poor defensive team, and this trade makes them worse, not better defensively.
The point on offensive philosophy is, D'Antoni has coached this team as a fast breaking quick hitting team for years, and now they will need to learn to slow the game up for Shaq. This doesn't happen overnight when you've run a team a certain way for years. They will have a very short period of time to integrate Shaq and a very limited window of success with him. I don't think it happens this year, and then what happens next season when he is yet another year older, slower, and even more out of shape?
Also, Shaq is an excellent post passer, one of the best in the game, but he needs the ball to operate. Shaq's most effective work comes in setting up in the post, and either scoring or hitting cutters, but he needs the ball to do so. How is that going to work when Nash also needs the ball to be effective? One reason Shaq has been so successful with Penny, then Kobe, then Wade is because having a dominant two guard like those guys (Wade and Penny have been considered ones, but they were twos) free's Shaq up to operate in the post without requiring them to have the ball in their hands.
BTW, XMan, make sure to pickup your new Shaq replica uniform while they are hot.
Originally posted by: XMan
Originally posted by: trmiv
Apparently Phoenix wants Shaq to stick to rebounding and defending. Aside from being an imposing figure, Shaq has never been a good defender. He doesn't particularly like doing it, and Shaq has said he will not be a token center. Also, Shaq is horrible at defending the pick-and-roll because he NEVER shows. The Suns will get PNR'd to death with Shaq in the lineup. They will get a taste of their own medicine on a nightly basis. Yes he will be better at defending post-players, but I think their overall defense will suffer. Right now he's complaining about "touches" in Miami, so he still clearly sees himself as an offensive threat that needs shots, how is he going to accept being asked to just rebound the ball and play defense? I don't see how it will work. Another thing is, Shaq represents a stark change in offensively philosophy for the Suns. Their offense has been built on scoring in 10 seconds or less, steals, quick outlet passes off rebounds, run run run. Now they will need to become more of a half-court team for Shaq to succeed in their offense. From what I've read D'Antoni doesn't sound particularly enthusiastic about the trade, how is it going to work if your coach isn't buying into it, and has to change his offense to boot?
PNRs . . . sounds good, but Shaq has never had a weak-side defender who can block shots as well as Amare behind him. Ho Grant? Meh. I can see it now . . . Parker and Duncan PNR around Shaq . . . Parker to the hoop . . . REJECTED by Stoudemire.
Offensive philosopy . . . I disagree, the Suns very rarely fast break with all five players. Shaq can trail. And when the game slows down he can move into the low block. Amare is effective enough from the elbow that he doesn't need the post. And who do you double team? Shaq? Amare? Double team Shaq, he kicks it to Amare, who is stronger than most fours and faster than most fives. I think Amare's scoring will go up significantly with Shaq in the lineup.
And, don't forget the Nash factor. Shaq has never played with a point guard of Nash's caliber. (Wade and Penny aren't true points, IMO). Steve will get him a consistent diet of easy buckets. Same with Hill and Diaw.
Originally posted by: homercles337
Shaq is a hack. He is probably one of the *worst* players in the NBA.
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: homercles337
Shaq is a hack. He is probably one of the *worst* players in the NBA.
/me taps his sarcasm meter..hmm seems to be working.
Originally posted by: homercles337
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: homercles337
Shaq is a hack. He is probably one of the *worst* players in the NBA.
/me taps his sarcasm meter..hmm seems to be working.
Talent? Nope. Not there. He's big, thats all he has got.
Originally posted by: homercles337
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: homercles337
Shaq is a hack. He is probably one of the *worst* players in the NBA.
/me taps his sarcasm meter..hmm seems to be working.
Talent? Nope. Not there. He's big, thats all he has got.