That's some nice spin you have going on there, buddy. I've reviewed the question and answer and the question was not specific enough for his answer to be perjury. Sessions isn't going anywhere. As chairman of the armed services committee, it was his job to meet with ambassadors, which he did while he was still a senator....just as Democrats like Pelosi and countless others have done. They've pretty much all communicated with Russians. This amounts to nothing more than Democrats looking to trip him on a testimonial discrepancy that could happen easily to anyone else. I believe he answered the question, as he understood it, honestly. You are free to disagree, but that's my take, after carefully looking at all the information and trying to be objective. What I see is some still angry Democrats, trying to lynch every Republican they can find even a crumb on, because they refuse to even try and be objective. It's a war and a strong desire, on their part, for this administration to fail, even if they have to try and force it to happen.
Spin? What part of "I did not have communications with the Russians." is true?
The damned fool *volunteered* an obvious lie in sworn testimony trying to spin away from Franken's question.
That's completely unacceptable in our chief law enforcement officer & you know it.
Trump & the Repubs can obviously advance their agenda anyway with a new AG who doesn't tell stupid lies.
