• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sen. John Ensign

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Shuxclams

# Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Apr 2007)
# Voted NO on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives. (Mar 2005)
# Voted NO on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes. (Jun 2002)

# Voted YES on defining unborn child as eligible for SCHIP. (Mar 2008)
# Voted YES on prohibiting minors crossing state lines for abortion. (Mar 2008)
# Voted YES on barring HHS grants to organizations that perform abortions. (Oct 2007)
# Voted YES on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions. (Jul 2006)
# Voted YES on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime. (Mar 2004)
# Voted YES on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life. (Mar 2003)
# Voted YES on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. (Jun 2006)
# Voted YES on loosening restrictions on cell phone wiretapping. (Oct 2001)
# Voted with Republican Party 91.7% of 314 votes. (Sep 2007)

This guy is a first class asshole and should be removed from representing anyone in this country.

What? He is representing America and it's values that's why he was elected.
 
Originally posted by: dali71
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Originally posted by: OCguy
Did the wife he cheated on have cancer, or is that strictly a democrat thing?

I guess you'd have to ask Rush Limbaugh that question.

Did Rush cheat on one of his wives, or did one of them have cancer? If so, please provide proof, because that's news to me.

Bump to see if you're ever going to clarify your statement.
 
http://citizensforethics.org/node/41522

20 Jul 2009 // Washington, D.C. - Today, CREW received a letter from William M. Welch II, Chief of the Public Integrity Section of the Department of Justice, stating that it would up to the FBI, not DOJ, to decide whether or not to investigate Sen. John Ensign (R-NV) for criminal violations of campaign finance law. In response to Mr. Welch?s letter, CREW forwarded its original complaint against Sen. Ensign to Joseph Persichini, the Assistant Director in Charge for the FBI?s Washington Field Office.

Melanie Sloan, CREW?s executive director, said, ?We can?t help but wonder, did Public Integrity refuse to investigate out of fear of political fallout given how the section bungled the prosecution of former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens??

Read the DOJ's letter to CREW and our forwarded complaint to the FBI in the Related Documents section on the right.
 
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Originally posted by: jonks
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200...re_us/us_ensign_affair

Ensign: "I may be a fucking scumbag, but at least I'm not a criminal fucking scumbag!"

Uh, yeah, good one John. Well said.

Any resident "republicans" care to chime in about this - or shall ye remain silent?

Being from NV; many politicians are slime after being in office more that a couple of terms.
It makes no difference which party they belong to - they let power go to their heads and think that they are not truly repsonsible to the people.
 
What's most sad is a 50 year-old man had to get his mommy and daddy to pay, errr .... 'gift', the extortion, errrr .... 'backmail', errr ... 'severence', (errr ... 'hush'?) money.

"" Hey, Tom Coburn. Thanks for the advice! (and coverup) ""
 
Back
Top