Texashiker
Lifer
- Dec 18, 2010
- 18,811
- 197
- 106
Which threat would voters remove?
Some people would say obama.
I say its the 2 party system.
Which threat would voters remove?
How do I vote so we have real human beings who care about America and its citizens rather than phony politicians in office?
More delusional nonsense.
http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/04/ice_arrest_3k_immigrants_in_6_days_largest_roundup_ever.html
I could provide copious other links to prove you don't know what the F you're talking about when it comes to border and immigration enforcement in general by thise administration, but it would be a waste of my time.
Are you forgetting he told ICE to not respond to Arizona immigration arrests? That alone has lead to the deaths of civilians. That American blood is on his hands.
Some people would say obama.
I say its the 2 party system.
LOL.
It must be hard to hate someone that much Spidey.
I take it you weren't alive when LBJ or Reagan was in office.
Are you forgetting he told ICE to not respond to Arizona immigration arrests? That alone has lead to the deaths of civilians. That American blood is on his hands.
The more you post, the more my point is made.....
\please, keep going.....
\\and enjoy your dishonesty......
\\\as it is - that many had knowledge that Osama was holded up in Pakistan during the Bush term in office...
See you in November. Cant you feel the excitement to get rid of him?
Just stay home. Don't vote. Your Obama has it in the bag. Just stay unmotivated liberals. Stay down. Lie down. You're done.
I would have worded it differantly
I say its the 2 party monopoly system that doesn't allow the voice of reason to be heard in the form of media coverage which is controlled by zionist.
It was unique in two ways. First, the political payoff was exceptionally high. Second, the potential political damage in invading a sovereign nation that's nominally if not realistically an ally was significantly higher than probably any Presidential decision short of war. This thing could have gone horribly wrong, politically for Obama and personally for the SEALS and their family. Obama could not have gotten Usama without Bush's prior work, and the heavy lifting was as always done by the SEALs, military intelligence, and the CIA, but Obama deserves substantial credit for being the one who had to go out on a limb.What you're describing is just how the Presidency works, there is NOTHING unique about the mission to kill Osama bin Laden. Of course Obama's job was authorizing the mission and making the final decision to go ahead...that's what the President DOES. He doesn't analyze intelligence, talk to assets or jump out of a helicopter with an M-16. The complaint that he doesn't deserve a "big win" because he didn't do any of those things sounds silly. If Obama can't count killing bin Laden as a win, then I don't see how a President can get blame or credit for anything he or she does.
Obama could not have gotten Usama without Bush's prior work