Texashiker
Lifer
- Dec 18, 2010
- 18,812
- 192
- 106
Some people would say obama.Which threat would voters remove?
I say its the 2 party system.
Some people would say obama.Which threat would voters remove?
soon child of wonder soon the answer to your question shall be at hand.How do I vote so we have real human beings who care about America and its citizens rather than phony politicians in office?
Are you forgetting he told ICE to not respond to Arizona immigration arrests? That alone has lead to the deaths of civilians. That American blood is on his hands.More delusional nonsense.
http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/04/ice_arrest_3k_immigrants_in_6_days_largest_roundup_ever.html
I could provide copious other links to prove you don't know what the F you're talking about when it comes to border and immigration enforcement in general by thise administration, but it would be a waste of my time.
Lets not forget that an ICE agent was reprimanded for arresting an illegal immigrant.Are you forgetting he told ICE to not respond to Arizona immigration arrests? That alone has lead to the deaths of civilians. That American blood is on his hands.
I would have worded it differantlySome people would say obama.
I say its the 2 party system.
He's really looking for a date. And those strong, manly men, depending on each other for strength and support, living in close quarters, taking showers together, cleaning their weapons, killing non Caucasians...LOL.
It must be hard to hate someone that much Spidey.
Neither one of them was a n****r, though.I take it you weren't alive when LBJ or Reagan was in office.
God Emperor Reagan was responsible for the deaths of thousands, and sold weapons to terrorists. Which were used against civilians. I never hear you or the rest of the mentally deficient tea partiers say anything about that. Then again, it was mainly brown people who were killed, so for all tea partiers, that's a good thing.Are you forgetting he told ICE to not respond to Arizona immigration arrests? That alone has lead to the deaths of civilians. That American blood is on his hands.
What dishonesty? You posted a link to a video in support of Abraxas that had nothing in its content that provided any support. I can't help that, you did that, not me. General campaign statements made by O'Bummer in a debate that are essentially meaningless....don't mean really anything.The more you post, the more my point is made.....
\please, keep going.....
\\and enjoy your dishonesty......
\\\as it is - that many had knowledge that Osama was holded up in Pakistan during the Bush term in office...
LMAO still rolling large with those awesome cloth seats!See you in November. Cant you feel the excitement to get rid of him?
Just stay home. Don't vote. Your Obama has it in the bag. Just stay unmotivated liberals. Stay down. Lie down. You're done.
Yes, the Israeli leadership is full of fundies, and their Democracy has major issues that affect their foreign policy. But not everyone there is a "Zionist".I would have worded it differantly
I say its the 2 party monopoly system that doesn't allow the voice of reason to be heard in the form of media coverage which is controlled by zionist.
It was unique in two ways. First, the political payoff was exceptionally high. Second, the potential political damage in invading a sovereign nation that's nominally if not realistically an ally was significantly higher than probably any Presidential decision short of war. This thing could have gone horribly wrong, politically for Obama and personally for the SEALS and their family. Obama could not have gotten Usama without Bush's prior work, and the heavy lifting was as always done by the SEALs, military intelligence, and the CIA, but Obama deserves substantial credit for being the one who had to go out on a limb.What you're describing is just how the Presidency works, there is NOTHING unique about the mission to kill Osama bin Laden. Of course Obama's job was authorizing the mission and making the final decision to go ahead...that's what the President DOES. He doesn't analyze intelligence, talk to assets or jump out of a helicopter with an M-16. The complaint that he doesn't deserve a "big win" because he didn't do any of those things sounds silly. If Obama can't count killing bin Laden as a win, then I don't see how a President can get blame or credit for anything he or she does.
President Bush himself could've authorized a plan to Bin Laden, likely before he crossed the border.Obama could not have gotten Usama without Bush's prior work