Seagate 7200.10 320GB Serial ATA II HDD + Ritek 25 DVDs for $100 shipped

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

CliffordDawgie

Junior Member
Jul 10, 2006
16
0
0
Originally posted by: jlin101
I just compared my 74 gb raptor to a new WD1600JS with sata II. One on one, the raptor is a little faster on some benches, but not all. At the price of a raptor, though, you can easily buy two barracudas and do a raid 0--that should kill a raptor (unless you are a big spender and want to get raptors in raid).

Raid 0 sucks
 

jlin101

Senior member
Feb 12, 2005
816
0
0
I've never tried raid so I can't speak from experience. But if raid 0 is bad, why is it used by all the major pc vendors on their performance pc and gaming rigs? I know if 1 drive goes down, you are screwed, but the same goes when you only have 1 hd and it dies.
 

CliffordDawgie

Junior Member
Jul 10, 2006
16
0
0
Originally posted by: jlin101
I've never tried raid so I can't speak from experience. But if raid 0 is bad, why is it used by all the major pc vendors on their performance pc and gaming rigs? I know if 1 drive goes down, you are screwed, but the same goes when you only have 1 hd and it dies.

Theres a anandtech article on it, the improved performance is so insignificant it's not worth the risk. It's used by performance pcs and gaming rigs because most of those are huge nerds that are just bored and want to do something or brag about something.

Link
 

TheShiz

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
3,846
0
0
Originally posted by: jlin101
I've never tried raid so I can't speak from experience. But if raid 0 is bad, why is it used by all the major pc vendors on their performance pc and gaming rigs? I know if 1 drive goes down, you are screwed, but the same goes when you only have 1 hd and it dies.

think of it this way, the odds 1 out of 2 hard drives will fail is twice as likely as a single drive failing, so there definately is increased risk. for real world you are much better off just having 2 hard drives in your system since the performance gains are insignificant. that way hopefully the one that fails is not your system drive. or you could raid to duplicate the data across the drives, which will greatly reduce the risk.
 

blacklit

Senior member
Feb 15, 2003
440
0
0
Originally posted by: TheShiz
Originally posted by: jlin101
I've never tried raid so I can't speak from experience. But if raid 0 is bad, why is it used by all the major pc vendors on their performance pc and gaming rigs? I know if 1 drive goes down, you are screwed, but the same goes when you only have 1 hd and it dies.

think of it this way, the odds 1 out of 2 hard drives will fail is twice as likely as a single drive failing, so there definately is increased risk. for real world you are much better off just having 2 hard drives in your system since the performance gains are insignificant. that way hopefully the one that fails is not your system drive. or you could raid to duplicate the data across the drives, which will greatly reduce the risk.

this dude needs to take a probability class.

once you go RAID, chances are, you'll never go back. u can get the fastest, unreleased, MIT-developed hard drive scheduled for 2010, and the first thing you'll think about is putting 2 of them in RAID0. desktop software isn't too bogged down by hardware these days so in the grand scheme of things, not a big deal, right? so what if you wait an extra 1, 2, 3... however many seconds?

BUT... i'll tell you, and anyone else with RAID will tell you, it IS faster -- oh so VERY NOTICEABLY faster.

on failure rate, 1 or 2 in RAID0 or 3 in RAID5... all setups have failure rates. is it easier to recover from any of those setups? no, you still have to start from scratch after a failure. spare yourself the failure rate BS and just have a recovery plan. ghost will do.

you seem like an reasonably adventurous fellow. i think the little man inside you says you ought to at least try it! RAID yourself free. i highly doubt you'll think "hmm, i know my failure rate is higher now because it's in RAID0... i shouldn't have done that."
 

tallman45

Golden Member
May 27, 2003
1,463
0
0
Originally posted by: blacklit
Originally posted by: TheShiz
Originally posted by: jlin101

BUT... i'll tell you, and anyone else with RAID will tell you, it IS faster -- oh so VERY NOTICEABLY faster.

q]


Not always, RAID 0 is only faster when using large files. Loading an OS onto a RAID 0 is actually slower than running from a single drive. Every file must be striped, even the small ones which are smaller than the stripe size setting. So you add overhead to tiny files than now must run through a RAID controller.
 

blacklit

Senior member
Feb 15, 2003
440
0
0
Originally posted by: tallman45
Originally posted by: blacklit
Originally posted by: TheShiz
Originally posted by: jlin101

BUT... i'll tell you, and anyone else with RAID will tell you, it IS faster -- oh so VERY NOTICEABLY faster.

Not always, RAID 0 is only faster when using large files. Loading an OS onto a RAID 0 is actually slower than running from a single drive. Every file must be striped, even the small ones which are smaller than the stripe size setting. So you add overhead to tiny files than now must run through a RAID controller.

nonsense ~ but nice effort. do not compare speeds "loading an OS" in RAID0 to "running the OS" in 1HD... idiocy.

this guy is [forgivably] trying to drop science to make a point he managed to recall using his extreme brainpower. just how frequently does any user install the OS that you figured it a knock-out idea to share your oh-so-valuable input?

~ with all do respect
 

soloz2

Member
Apr 20, 2006
145
0
0
Originally posted by: CliffordDawgie
Originally posted by: jlin101
I just compared my 74 gb raptor to a new WD1600JS with sata II. One on one, the raptor is a little faster on some benches, but not all. At the price of a raptor, though, you can easily buy two barracudas and do a raid 0--that should kill a raptor (unless you are a big spender and want to get raptors in raid).

Raid 0 sucks



Have you ever tried RAID 0? Have you ever benchmarked a RAID 0 array?

I've got 2 of the new Raptors in RAID 0 and they are blazingly fast!


the new Raptors are better because they are faster and quieter. They have a single platter which is more dense than the older platters and thus are faster. They also have double the cache.
 

CliffordDawgie

Junior Member
Jul 10, 2006
16
0
0
Originally posted by: soloz2
Originally posted by: CliffordDawgie
Originally posted by: jlin101
I just compared my 74 gb raptor to a new WD1600JS with sata II. One on one, the raptor is a little faster on some benches, but not all. At the price of a raptor, though, you can easily buy two barracudas and do a raid 0--that should kill a raptor (unless you are a big spender and want to get raptors in raid).

Raid 0 sucks



Have you ever tried RAID 0? Have you ever benchmarked a RAID 0 array?

I've got 2 of the new Raptors in RAID 0 and they are blazingly fast!


the new Raptors are better because they are faster and quieter. They have a single platter which is more dense than the older platters and thus are faster. They also have double the cache.
It's the raptors that are fast, not the RAID and yes RAID0 has better benchmarks but as far as performance doing real things, it's insignificant, im basing these on articles not taking it outta my ass so..

 

Mellman

Diamond Member
Jul 9, 2003
3,083
0
76
lol @ newegg & ups...

ordered 2 min apart, i get one drive yesterday, the other is coming today...not to mention UPS took them both on completely different routes.

Oh well, so long as my D50 comes back today I"ll be happy with UPS.

 

Lurker1

Senior member
Sep 27, 2003
666
0
0
Originally posted by: CliffordDawgie
It's the raptors that are fast, not the RAID and yes RAID0 has better benchmarks but as far as performance doing real things, it's insignificant, im basing these on articles not taking it outta my ass so..

Actually, you are talking out of your ass. Read that article closely again, there's a sentence that states for certain applications, there will be a significant speed up.

Guess what a major, relatively common application is? Video/audio editing and encoding. You'll most definitely note a major speed improvement there, as long as you have a fast enough CPU(s).

I'll grant you that for reading email, word processing, and web browsing that RAID0 is overkill. So is a P4 or AMD 64, for that matter. It's all about purpose. You don't buy a ferrari to haul trash, and you don't buy a pickup to race formula 1. For those that are experiencing disk I/O bottlenecks, RAID 0 is a perfect answer, as long as increased failure rates are taken into account.

[edit] BTW, I should add that RAID1, if properly done by the software/hardware, will imperceptibly slow down writes over a single drive solution, but reads should be equivalent to 2 drives in RAID0. (Striped reading is possible on mirrored drives) Unfortunately, to get that performance generally means having to go to expensive RAID controllers, unless something's changed recently.
 

CliffordDawgie

Junior Member
Jul 10, 2006
16
0
0
Sorry buddy, I don't agree that a video editing and encoding is a very common use for computer users. I'm sure a lot of people can agree with me here. Also the majority get P4 and AMD 64s for gaming purposes, but there is no faster load time for RAID 0 unfortunately.
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
7
81
Originally posted by: CliffordDawgie
there is no faster load time for RAID 0 unfortunately.

There is... just that us mere mortals can't count on our fingers that fast. :p
 

promposive

Senior member
Jun 15, 2004
912
0
71
Originally posted by: CliffordDawgie
Sorry buddy, I don't agree that a video editing and encoding is a very common use for computer users. I'm sure a lot of people can agree with me here. Also the majority get P4 and AMD 64s for gaming purposes, but there is no faster load time for RAID 0 unfortunately.

I do video encoding alot... Burn many dvds?
 

shamgar03

Senior member
Jul 13, 2004
289
0
0
I used Raid 0 for my 2 raptors for like a week or 2 and couldn't figure out why CPU usage was so high all the time. Turns out raid 0 support in the mobo is software based. Think about it like this: software based = cpu usage = basically not using DMA. If you have ever not used DMA its not the raw speed thats a problem its the complete waste of CPU time. In OTHER news I think I might have to jump on this. thanks OP
 

boggsie

Platinum Member
Mar 31, 2000
2,326
1
81
Originally posted by: SKORPI0
Originally posted by: shamgar03
BTW dead?
Yes, combo deal is dead. But HDD is still avialable for $99.99 with free shipping.

I've had these drives for about a week and they are much, much quieter than the maxtor SATA drives I also have - fwiw.

 

rockytong

Junior Member
Jul 13, 2006
10
0
0
Man, it sucks that I just got 2 of these for $99.99 three days ago and today they drop it down to $94.99. I just lost $10+tax. Do you guys know if Newegg will honor price adjustment?
 

CrazyGamer

Senior member
Sep 19, 2003
356
0
0
From the Newegg FAQ (product section):

The price of an item I purchased has dropped prior to shipment. Is it possible to get a refund of the difference?

Newegg.com does not offer any price guarantee, because industry prices change too often and too fast. If your order has not shipped, you can cancel the order online and re-order to take advantage of the new prices. All prices are as posted at the time of purchase.

On a side note I know the feeling, I paid $5 more each drive over the weekend as well and missed out on the free dvds.
 

Parkre

Senior member
Jul 31, 2005
616
0
0
Alright... I can't pass up the 94.99 for 320 GB with free shipping

I am in for 2 HD and a SATA card (since my mobo's full)

All for $214 shipped..
 

BIGFOOTPI

Golden Member
Mar 8, 2005
1,029
0
0
MUUUUHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Just ordered one and applied my price mistake $25 credit ;)

(and my boss too)

so two drives for $69.99ea shipped- booya!
 

Parkre

Senior member
Jul 31, 2005
616
0
0
Originally posted by: BIGFOOTPI
MUUUUHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Just ordered one and applied my price mistake $25 credit ;)

(and my boss too)

so two drives for $69.99ea shipped- booya!



What????!?!?!?!?!?!??! What happened???
 

BIGFOOTPI

Golden Member
Mar 8, 2005
1,029
0
0
what do you mean what happened? We applied our $25 price mistake credits to our orders and got the drives even cheaper...
for those that missed it, there was a big fiasco covered here in the forums about a super deal on 160gb IDE drives on serious discount at newegg- everyone who ordered 160gb seagate HDDs from newegg for 30some bucks got shafted ( CC cards charged but orders cancelled), and then got $25 store credits for their trouble if the called and whined like we and many other ATers did..
 

Parkre

Senior member
Jul 31, 2005
616
0
0
ah, I thought you meant you got 25 from a pricing error on the 320 drive.

a previous order...jeez.. where's my head at today??