Originally posted by: TheShiz
Originally posted by: jlin101
I've never tried raid so I can't speak from experience. But if raid 0 is bad, why is it used by all the major pc vendors on their performance pc and gaming rigs? I know if 1 drive goes down, you are screwed, but the same goes when you only have 1 hd and it dies.
think of it this way, the odds 1 out of 2 hard drives will fail is twice as likely as a single drive failing, so there definately is increased risk. for real world you are much better off just having 2 hard drives in your system since the performance gains are insignificant. that way hopefully the one that fails is not your system drive. or you could raid to duplicate the data across the drives, which will greatly reduce the risk.
this dude needs to take a probability class.
once you go RAID, chances are, you'll never go back. u can get the fastest, unreleased, MIT-developed hard drive scheduled for 2010, and the first thing you'll think about is putting 2 of them in RAID0. desktop software isn't too bogged down by hardware these days so in the grand scheme of things, not a big deal, right? so what if you wait an extra 1, 2, 3... however many seconds?
BUT... i'll tell you, and anyone else with RAID will tell you, it IS faster -- oh so VERY NOTICEABLY faster.
on failure rate, 1 or 2 in RAID0 or 3 in RAID5... all setups have failure
rates. is it easier to recover from any of those setups? no, you still have to start from scratch after a failure. spare yourself the failure rate BS and just have a recovery plan. ghost will do.
you seem like an reasonably adventurous fellow. i think the little man inside you says you ought to at least
try it! RAID yourself free. i highly doubt you'll think "hmm, i know my failure rate is higher now because it's in RAID0... i shouldn't have done that."