Originally posted by: esquared
Thanks for the link engineer. The review makes it look a little noisy and a bit on the hot side.
Seek noise was quite a different story. The 7200.9 sample had sharp, abrupt seeks, and this aspect was even more in this 7200.10. In fact, the peaks measured 34 dBA@1m, making it the first drive we've measured above 30 dBA@1m. The implementation of Automatic Acoustic Management (AAM) to reduce the seek noise is sorely missed.
A new record was set for the amount of power consumed at idle: The 7200.10 is the first drive we've seen that consumes more than 9 watts at idle. As this would suggest, the drive ran quite hot; by the end of the acoustic testing, during which the drive was resting on a nonconductive piece of foam, I was unable to touch the drive for more than a second or two. (Editor's Note: Wimp! ?) According to the internal thermal sensor, the drive temperature at this time was 53°C and climbing.
The little brother of its acclaimed 750GB drive, the 7200.10 300GB is so new it's hard to find any information beyond promotional flyers! Also available in 16MB-cache versions, our ST3300820AS model ties an 8MB cache to a SATA 3Gb/s interface. The largest change from Seagate's "early" 7200.10 320GB of just a few weeks ago is the use of two higher-density platters rather than three, which should reduce heat and noise. Seagate credits the 7200.10 series' density to perpendicular-bit technology, but we've already seen platters up to 160GB in its most recent 7200.9 longitudinal-bit design.
Originally posted by: Engineer
4 way shootout featuring the 300GB (not 320) Seagate 7200.10.
Strange though that it mentions this...
So does the 320GB version have 3 platters or 2?
Edit: Datasheet says 2 platters/ 4 heads for the 320GB version.
Originally posted by: hube235
Dang, I wish it were that easy to upgrade drives for me... I"ve maxed out my SATA connections so that means I'd hafta replace one of my drives, and sure has heck not replacing my raptor. My main sata drive has all my crap and I'm not going through the process of installing that all that crap again...
Originally posted by: jlin101
I just compared my 74 gb raptor to a new WD1600JS with sata II. One on one, the raptor is a little faster on some benches, but not all. At the price of a raptor, though, you can easily buy two barracudas and do a raid 0--that should kill a raptor (unless you are a big spender and want to get raptors in raid).
