SCOTUS hearing on Roe V Wade

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,082
136
The problem is not the law. Its how propagandists and fundamentalist's interpret the law.
Theres a metric fuck ton of christians in this country who honestly believe that the first amendment means they can do whatever the hell they want to other people and other people have to respect it. It is not helped by nutjobs and snake oil salesmen pushing that agenda for decades.
 

uclaLabrat

Diamond Member
Aug 2, 2007
5,632
3,046
136
Exactly, and freedom of religion is important, bit not.more important than freedom FROM religion. Those hypocritical assbags want to decry the threat of sharia law, all the while violently attempting to implement their own version of it.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,726
17,376
136
Okay then. Don't read what I posted in the quote and just say whatever you want to. But from what I read, and posted a quick summary from from LII, is that there are sometimes points of contention between these two requirements (as there almost always are - this is why we have a SCOTUS!). You made a blanket statement. I'm just saying that such a statement is simplistic. That's all.

Of course it’s complicated, it’s also contradictory.

The constitution says the government is to be neutral when it comes to religion but immediately says that people are allowed to exercise their religion. You can’t be neutral if laws interfere with religious practices or religious practices interfere with laws.

I’m guessing the courts have tried to take a balanced approach where an undue burden test is used to balance religious beliefs with legislation.

My statement was more of an opinion of how I wish things were interpreted not as a matter of fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pmv and Ajay

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,712
48,518
136
Still more than enough time. It's not like it's a "surprise when you win an election". The bills should have been ready to go.
Especially if the bills are things that don't really cost money and are mostly just policy and rule changes


I disagree. Sometimes due diligence and consensus building isn't easy, or brief. Who is in charge for the next 2 or 4 years can mean a lot to corporations. Personally I don't feel 4 months is enough for leadership of an economy this big to all be on the same page, not with so many special interests vying for political advantage, progress, profit, whatever. American conservatives have the benefit of heavily funding the 'think tank' and diploma mills for lobbying going on several decades now. The liberal analog is much younger and smaller, less experienced and typically not as well funded. Remember you save time when you're fond of having industry and special interests just hand in the legislation pre typed, ready for signing and submission. Overall the Dem party is no where near as homogeneous as the GQP, more views. Then there are Indies. Now add the constant obstruction and scheming of people like Ryan and McConnell, also that filibusters only really apply to Dems. This all adds up and it's not in the Democrats favor.

I'm not happy about it either, wish they'd figger it oot as you can't blame everything on the Manchins and Sinemas. Plenty of scorn over here for the Dems. They did their duty impeaching Trump the Traitor; it was the GQP traitors* in the Senate to blame for the rest. But not fighting dirty over Merrick Garland or January 6th* sticks in my craw. I wish the Dems would get lean and mean. Give Katie Porter a License to Kill plus a captive bolt cattle gun and just stand back.


*some notable exceptions
 
Last edited:

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,712
48,518
136
Think of the dichotomy pro lifers protect that fetus until born. Now that baby is subject to catching COVID because those same pro lifers are fighting mask mandates for heath care workers.

COVID then kills the baby. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED

"Pro-life" was already a joke, it's been lowered to a bad joke now though. So many disconnects completely ignored, they just don't care, but that's what you get with a cult. Gotta punish those unwed whores.

This sums it up:

KAQhTFq.jpeg
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
I disagree. Sometimes due diligence and consensus building isn't easy, or brief. Who is in charge for the next 2 or 4 years can mean a lot to corporations. Personally I don't feel 4 months is enough for leadership of an economy this big to all be on the same page, not with so many special interests vying for political advantage, progress, profit, whatever. American conservatives have the benefit of heavily funding the 'think tank' and diploma mills for lobbying going on several decades now. The liberal analog is much younger and smaller, less experienced and typically not as well funded. Remember you save time when you're fond of having industry and special interests just hand in the legislation pre typed, ready for signing and submission. Overall the Dem party is no where near as homogeneous as the GQP, more views. Then there are Indies. Now add the constant obstruction and scheming of people like Ryan and McConnell, also that filibusters only really apply to Dems. This all adds up and it's not in the Democrats favor.

I'm not happy about it either, wish they'd figger it oot as you can't blame everything on the Manchins and Sinemas. Plenty of scorn over here for the Dems. They did their duty impeaching Trump the Traitor; it was the GQP traitors* in the Senate to blame for the rest. But not fighting dirty over Merrick Garland or January 6th* sticks in my craw. I wish the Dems would get lean and mean. Give Katie Porter a License to Kill plus a captive bolt cattle gun and just stand back.


*some notable exceptions

The rolled over when it came to Barrett. That was particularly egregious. I mean at the end of the day the democratic party has been a bunch of wimps of recent, kowtowing to the idea of taking the high road all the time assuming that'll force the other side to do the same, when the other side is just getting bolder, crazier, and less negotiable.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,712
48,518
136
The rolled over when it came to Barrett. That was particularly egregious. I mean at the end of the day the democratic party has been a bunch of wimps of recent, kowtowing to the idea of taking the high road all the time assuming that'll force the other side to do the same, when the other side is just getting bolder, crazier, and less negotiable.

There are a few ballbusters in there, but yeah you're right for the most part. Still blows my mind the last 3 judges put on SCOTUS were put there by the guy who created an insurrection and is still running a slow moving coup. That Jan 6th Commission really needs to hurry the hell up, even though I get doing it right and the opposition is stalling. At least Biden will be CiC for 2022 and 2024, even if he's been one of those guilty in acting like he's been dealing with republicans of a different era. The transgressions of Mitch McConnell alone should be haunting every Dem at night, without end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,905
6,788
126
I think the left is dreaming. They operate as if all the bad things that will happen if Roe is lost is somehow important to the argument. But to a conservative life is full of evil, evil done by liberals and not conservatives. There is one primary sin and that is to treat life as if it were not sacred, that each person born is a person with a soul created by God within, and that to murder that soul is the highest evil there is. To allow the state to allow people to commit that form of murder makes them complicit and they will not have that. Whatever evil befalls others is their problem to deal with. Whatever sin others commit they are responsible for but state sponsored murder drags them right into it. They refuse to belong to a state that kills people because that also makes them killers. There can be no higher priority for them than not to be that.

Look at what you feel about living in a state that would force you to place the of value of a piece of hamburger meat above the life of yourself, your sister, your wife or your daughter.

This whole issue exists, in my opinion, because the simplest way to to think today and scientifically, is that human life begins at the moment of conception. That notion is utterly compelling and utterly devastating, which is why the Jews of old had the great good sense and, I think, compassion not to conceive of the beginning of life at the first moment it can be detected. So many fetuses would die before being born so many misfortunes befall pregnant women, that to imagine all of these unborn to be ensouled would have produce so much more by way of crushing sorrow.

The problem then is one that is generated by fundamentalist religious belief, belief that is full of absolute principles, principles not shared by people of different religious or non religious origin. It is an issue of religious entitlement, the certainty that one's own personal certainty should prevail over the certainty of others.

I do not know the answer to this while i believe I know some things that it isn't, but I can see that the greatest danger to Christianity in America is it's will to dominate in politics. I can't help but anticipate, that more and more as time goes on, more and more will begin to see them as the enemy within.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dank69

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
This sums it up:

KAQhTFq.jpeg

Yeah, my trumpie family / Biden haters have been pissed over that child credit expiring, and I tell them THEN YOU NEED TO SUPPORT BIDEN AND HIS BBB PLAN BECAUSE THAT CHILD CREDIT IS EXTENDED IN THE BBB. And they put on their deer in the headlights face. So sadly, they are clueless, and will vote for republicans who give them nothing but BS excuses. And they wonder why things have become so bad for them. :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and kage69

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,082
136
I listened to the arguments. They are utter horse shit. None of them could come up with a good reason to let the government violate medical privacy. They were all based on current economic trends and other unrelated issues. Its obvious they are setting up a narrative before taking away American rights.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,611
33,330
136
I think the left is dreaming. They operate as if all the bad things that will happen if Roe is lost is somehow important to the argument. But to a conservative life is full of evil, evil done by liberals and not conservatives. There is one primary sin and that is to treat life as if it were not sacred, that each person born is a person with a soul created by God within, and that to murder that soul is the highest evil there is. To allow the state to allow people to commit that form of murder makes them complicit and they will not have that. Whatever evil befalls others is their problem to deal with. Whatever sin others commit they are responsible for but state sponsored murder drags them right into it. They refuse to belong to a state that kills people because that also makes them killers. There can be no higher priority for them than not to be that.

Look at what you feel about living in a state that would force you to place the of value of a piece of hamburger meat above the life of yourself, your sister, your wife or your daughter.

This whole issue exists, in my opinion, because the simplest way to to think today and scientifically, is that human life begins at the moment of conception. That notion is utterly compelling and utterly devastating, which is why the Jews of old had the great good sense and, I think, compassion not to conceive of the beginning of life at the first moment it can be detected. So many fetuses would die before being born so many misfortunes befall pregnant women, that to imagine all of these unborn to be ensouled would have produce so much more by way of crushing sorrow.

The problem then is one that is generated by fundamentalist religious belief, belief that is full of absolute principles, principles not shared by people of different religious or non religious origin. It is an issue of religious entitlement, the certainty that one's own personal certainty should prevail over the certainty of others.

I do not know the answer to this while i believe I know some things that it isn't, but I can see that the greatest danger to Christianity in America is it's will to dominate in politics. I can't help but anticipate, that more and more as time goes on, more and more will begin to see them as the enemy within.
I ask pro-lifers if they think there is a line of souls in heaven waiting for their conception and if once they are conceived if they miscarry or are aborted do they go back to heaven where God says "sorry, that was your one chance to live." It's entertaining to watch cognitive dissonance in real time, yet frustrating to see someone instantly believe whatever bullshit they invent on the spot knowing they know deep down it's bullshit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,115
136
I ask pro-lifers if they think there is a line of souls in heaven waiting for their conception and if once they are conceived if they miscarry or are aborted do they go back to heaven where God says "sorry, that was your one chance to live." It's entertaining to watch cognitive dissonance in real time, yet frustrating to see someone instantly believe whatever bullshit they invent on the spot knowing they know deep down it's bullshit.
Allot of people don’t know what Christian churches teach, hence their reaction. They are just human. From past discussions here, I found out that I haven't kept up with what the church teaches wrt new technology used in abortion.

Expecting every Christian to be an expert in all areas of their faith is expecting too much from us (or any typical person). That would be like expecting everyone to be well versed in both physics, chemistry and biology, something the average Joe/Jane just doesn’t posses. Our priests and pastors have spent years in seminary studying the faith and are trained in ‘apologetics'. Laymen/women rarely invest that much time. I fail at times to just say 'I don’t know', or 'is it okay if I get back to you'. I know that the vast majority of people make the same mistake in speaking with others, no matter the subject.

Just my 2 cents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,584
13,273
136
Allot of people don’t know what Christian churches teach, hence their reaction. They are just human. From past discussions here, I found out that I haven't kept up with what the church teaches wrt new technology used in abortion.

Expecting every Christian to be an expert in all areas of their faith is expecting too much from us (or any typical person). That would be like expecting everyone to be well versed in both physics, chemistry and biology, something the average Joe/Jane just doesn’t posses. Our priests and pastors have spent years in seminary studying the faith and are trained in ‘apologetics'. Laymen/women rarely invest that much time. I fail at times to just say 'I don’t know', or 'is it okay if I get back to you'. I know that the vast majority of people make the same mistake in speaking with others, no matter the subject.

Just my 2 cents.
expecting them to know that jesus wasn't an asshole, and tended to the the weakest and outcasts in society, is like asking any scientist to understand basic scientific principles, even if they're aren't experts. my degree is in materials science, but i have a reasonable understanding of multiple scientific fields (mechanical, structural, chemical, electrical engineering; chemistry, physics, etc.)

having been raised catholic, my opinion is that modern christianity is largely hypocritical. would jesus be "backing the blue" or fighting for the oppressed? would he advocate for policies that uplift the poor and society in general - like housing and education initiatives and universal healthcare - or would he ensure that they are held down? would he give money to the rich or have them taxed?
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,667
48,251
136
expecting them to know that jesus wasn't an asshole, and tended to the the weakest and outcasts in society, is like asking any scientist to understand basic scientific principles, even if they're aren't experts.

The number of self proclaimed christians who miss or simply ignore the most obvious broadest strokes of the gospels is amazingly high.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,905
6,788
126
I ask pro-lifers if they think there is a line of souls in heaven waiting for their conception and if once they are conceived if they miscarry or are aborted do they go back to heaven where God says "sorry, that was your one chance to live." It's entertaining to watch cognitive dissonance in real time, yet frustrating to see someone instantly believe whatever bullshit they invent on the spot knowing they know deep down it's bullshit.
Allot of people don’t know what Christian churches teach, hence their reaction. They are just human. From past discussions here, I found out that I haven't kept up with what the church teaches wrt new technology used in abortion.

Expecting every Christian to be an expert in all areas of their faith is expecting too much from us (or any typical person). That would be like expecting everyone to be well versed in both physics, chemistry and biology, something the average Joe/Jane just doesn’t posses. Our priests and pastors have spent years in seminary studying the faith and are trained in ‘apologetics'. Laymen/women rarely invest that much time. I fail at times to just say 'I don’t know', or 'is it okay if I get back to you'. I know that the vast majority of people make the same mistake in speaking with others, no matter the subject.

Just my 2 cents.
I am very happy to have read these two quotes. In trying to find a way to deal with both I went to check out a Christian Mystic, Meister Eckhart, I long ago remember reading about. A Catholic, I think. Anyway, I read just this first page of quotes I found on the internet and for reasons you may well be able to imagine, I am, what? quite impressed:

“If the only prayer you said was thank you, that would be enough.”

“The eye through which I see God is the same eye through which God sees me; my eye and God's eye are one eye, one seeing, one knowing, one love.”

“Be willing to be a beginner every single morning.”

“And suddenly you know: It's time to start something new and trust the magic of beginnings.”

“Only the hand that erases can write the true thing.”

“Spirituality is not to be learned by flight from the world, or by running away from things, or by turning solitary and going apart from the world. Rather, we must learn an inner solitude wherever or with whomsoever we may be. We must learn to penetrate things and find God there.”

“Theologians may quarrel, but the mystics of the world speak the same language.”

“Nothing in all creation is so like God as stillness.”

“If the only prayer you said in your whole life was, "thank you," that would suffice.”

“Truly, it is in the darkness that one finds the light, so when we are in sorrow, then this light is nearest of all to us.”

“Wisdom consists in doing the next thing you have to do, doing it with your whole heart, and finding delight in doing it.”

“I am as sure as I live that nothing is so near to me as God. God is nearer to me than I am to myself; my existence depends on the nearness and the presence of God.”

“Some people prefer solitude. They say their peace of mind depends on this.
Others say they would be better off in church.
If you do well, you do well wherever you are. If you fail, you fail wherever you are.
Your surroundings don't matter. God is with you everywhere -- in the market place as well as in seclusion or in the church.
If you look for nothing but God, nothing or no one can disturb you.
God is not distracted by a multitude of things.
Nor can we be.”

“When the Soul wants to experience something she throws out an image in front of her and then steps into it.”

“Love is as strong as death, as hard as Hell. Death separates the soul from the body, but love separates all things from the soul.”

“The price of inaction is far greater than the cost of making a mistake.”

“We are all meant to be mothers of God...for God is always needing to be born.”

“Some people want to see God with their eyes as they see a cow, and to love Him as they love a cow - for the milk and cheese and profit it brings them. This is how it is with people who love God for the sake of outward wealth or inward comfort. They do not rightly love God, when they love Him for their own advantage. ”

“A human being has so many skins inside, covering the depths of the heart. We know so many things, but we don't know ourselves! Why, thirty or forty skins or hides, as thick and hard as an ox's or bear's, cover the soul. Go into your own ground and learn to know yourself there.”

“One must learn an inner solitude, wherever one may be.”

“One must not always think so much about what one should do, but rather what one should be. Our works do not ennoble us; but we must ennoble our works.”

“There’s a place in the soul where you’ve never been wounded.”

“I am what I wanted and I want what I am.”

“My Lord told me a joke. And seeing Him laugh has done more for me than any scripture I will ever read.”

“If I had a friend and loved him because of the benefits which this brought me and because of getting my own way, then it would not be my friend that I loved but myself. I should love my friend on account of his own goodness and virtues and account of all that he is in himself. Only if I love my friend in this way do I love him properly.”

“I need to be silent for a while, worlds are forming in my heart.”

“All God wants of man is a peaceful heart.”

“God is not good, or else he could do better.”

“Nobody at any time is cut off from God.”

“Run into peace.”
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,115
136
expecting them to know that jesus wasn't an asshole, and tended to the the weakest and outcasts in society, is like asking any scientist to understand basic scientific principles, even if they're aren't experts. my degree is in materials science, but i have a reasonable understanding of multiple scientific fields (mechanical, structural, chemical, electrical engineering; chemistry, physics, etc.)
And most people don't have degrees in science . The vast majority of Christians do not have degrees in theology either. Same issue for vast numbers of people in our society.
having been raised catholic, my opinion is that modern christianity is largely hypocritical. would jesus be "backing the blue" or fighting for the oppressed? would he advocate for policies that uplift the poor and society in general - like housing and education initiatives and universal healthcare - or would he ensure that they are held down? would he give money to the rich or have them taxed?

Jesus railed against the religious rulers of Judea and pointed out the perils of being rich. But that wasn't why He came. If he were here now, he would be most interested in bringing individuals to a saving knowledge of God. I'm pretty sure he would have no love whatsoever for either political party. Satan offered Him the opportunity to be a political leader, so long as Jesus would bow before him - hard pass. What do I say to people who say most Christians are hypocrites - yes, and we always have room for one more. Just take a hard look at humanity. I would think this would be self evident.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,380
24,602
136
Allot of people don’t know what Christian churches teach, hence their reaction. They are just human. From past discussions here, I found out that I haven't kept up with what the church teaches wrt new technology used in abortion.

Expecting every Christian to be an expert in all areas of their faith is expecting too much from us (or any typical person). That would be like expecting everyone to be well versed in both physics, chemistry and biology, something the average Joe/Jane just doesn’t posses. Our priests and pastors have spent years in seminary studying the faith and are trained in ‘apologetics'. Laymen/women rarely invest that much time. I fail at times to just say 'I don’t know', or 'is it okay if I get back to you'. I know that the vast majority of people make the same mistake in speaking with others, no matter the subject.

Just my 2 cents.
As an anti choice Christian, are you anti choice from the moment of conception? Or at a certain point after a woman finds out she is pregnant?
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,115
136
As an anti choice Christian, are you anti choice from the moment of conception? Or at a certain point after a woman finds out she is pregnant?
No, I'm literally pro-life, womb to the tomb. Standard Catholic social and bio-ethical philosophy based on the inherent dignity of man. That teaching has been around for a long time - but has changed as advancement in social welfare, scientific knowledge and philosophical understanding have made some concepts more opaque. Going back a bit, unknown thing developing in a mothers womb wasn’t considered a living child until it's heartbeat could be detected, using crude instruments no less.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,380
24,602
136
No, I'm literally pro-life, womb to the tomb. Standard Catholic social and bio-ethical philosophy based on the inherent dignity of man. That teaching has been around for a long time - but has changed as advancement in social welfare, scientific knowledge and philosophical understanding have made some concepts more opaque. Going back a bit, unknown thing developing in a mothers womb wasn’t considered a living child until it's heartbeat could be detected, using crude instruments no less.
So you believe the moment there is conception, a woman loses all rights to her body and is basically a slave vessel to some cells that got together which will form a zygote. Those cells have more rights than a living breathing woman.

I mean that's just obscene.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,380
24,602
136
No, I'm literally pro-life, womb to the tomb. Standard Catholic social and bio-ethical philosophy based on the inherent dignity of man. That teaching has been around for a long time - but has changed as advancement in social welfare, scientific knowledge and philosophical understanding have made some concepts more opaque. Going back a bit, unknown thing developing in a mothers womb wasn’t considered a living child until it's heartbeat could be detected, using crude instruments no less.
To add to my statement above, your brother in arms on this is the great Madison Cawthorn, that women are 'earthen vessels'



I mean I'm sorry, but there is nothing but sickness in thinking women have no rights the moment conception happens. No matter what you say, you agree they are now earthen vessels bound to perform their duty.

Creepy and crazy.
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,115
136
So you believe the moment there is conception, a woman loses all rights to her body and is basically a slave vessel to some cells that got together which will form a zygote. Those cells have more rights than a living breathing woman.

I mean that's just obscene.
Yes, your characterization is obscene. Motherhood is something greater than just being an incubator. But the modern world is so effed in the head about love and responsibility that many only look at this in dispassionately scientific manner. As if that is all that is going on here - the mechanics of biology. It’s like some kind of scientific fundamentalism from my perspective - and I'm a trained scientist and believe in its value to mankind. We are losing our way.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,380
24,602
136
Yes, your characterization is obscene. Motherhood is something greater than just being an incubator. But the modern world is so effed in the head about love and responsibility that many only look at this in dispassionately scientific manner. As if that is all that is going on here - the mechanics of biology. It’s like some kind of scientific fundamentalism from my perspective - and I'm a trained scientist and believe in its value to mankind. We are losing our way.
Willing mothers are beautiful. You are forcing motherhood, that's obscene. You conflating the two is horrific.

There is nothing great about forced motherhood onto people who don't want, are not ready and/or can't provide- and especially into a society who does little to help along the way.