• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Say what you will, but Brady freaking wins!

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Ok - the comparison about the season with Cassell and the Manning/Colts situation...is nothing but the dumbest sports post I've seen in weeks on here - and that is saying something.

Matt Cassell -was unknown, but given the fact that he's now a starter on another NFL team, and in fact played in the pro-bowl last year - the guy can play.

The QB's the Colts brought in when Manning went out? A retired Kerry Collins - who lasted, what, 2 games? Curtis Painter? Dan Orlovsky?

All this tells you is that the Colts had really shitty backup QB's, the Patriots had a future NFL starter as a backup - period.

Brady is every bit as good and as important to his team as Manning is.
 
He's good, but I don't think his line gets enough credit for his success. While the team has changed a bit, it's still impressive that Matt Cassel was able to go 11-5 with the same team that Brady has. I think that speaks worlds to the team as a whole, and less about Brady himself. He's still a very good QB that deserves the spot he'll get in Canton, but I don't think it's all him. I look at the Colts and see a team that MUST have Peyton Manning to succeed at all, and then look at the Patriots that seem to be able to do okay if they have to go without Brady.

Put Cassel in with the current team and he'd probably go 3-13. The team that Cassel went 11-5 with was pretty stacked and still a defensive powerhouse.
 
Fact: God loves Brady more than Tebow.


Brady is the greatest QB to ever play the game, everyone just needs to accept that and we should be stoked we've been able to see him play live.
 
Tuck rule, Spy Gate, Vinatieri... so yeah he's had help. I hate the Patriots and Belicheck but can't deny he's got the talent.

It's nice to finally be able to root for him though, and both times he played Denver this year I got to do that, doesn't happen often.
And still Tobow's personal jesus couldn't get the job done ... unless that was the job of losing last night.

I know, I know, Jesus was stuck on the return flight from SF.
 
Brady is a great quarterback but he still blew the perfect season in the freaking Superbowl.

Huh? did you watch the game?, he did EXACTLY what a QB is supposed to, drove them for the go-ahead score with 2:30 left on the clock, at that point the defense should make a stop, first Asante Samuel let an INT go through his hands then the incredible "helmet catch" play. Given how well the Giant's defense was pressuring/ sacking Brady there was no way he or any QB was gonna hang 30 points on them. I don't mean to be rude but you should educate yourself more on how a game develops rather than blurt out "Brady blew the SB"
 
Tuck rule, Spy Gate, Vinatieri... so yeah he's had help. I hate the Patriots and Belicheck but can't deny he's got the talent.

It's nice to finally be able to root for him though, and both times he played Denver this year I got to do that, doesn't happen often.

Tuck rule, yep, an iffy call went in out favor but the Raiders just needed one first down to win and they didn't get it done. I LOL when I still read some Raiders players ring out "They stole our SB!!", right, that's assuming if they beat NE they would have beaten Pitt in Pitt AND beat the prolific Rams offense in the SB. No one really knows how much the videos helped the Pats, teams routinely change defensive signals but it surely brought shame to the entire organization, dumb idea by BB. Since they went 16-0 in the following season without any illegal tapes to watch kinda sucks the idea out of "they were so good because they had tapes!". Vinatieri, clutch kicker no doubt but it was the offense that got him the opportunity to do it..
 
Never knew he said this, but this helps me like Brady a little more under a new perspective.

7xlTa.png
 
Ok - the comparison about the season with Cassell and the Manning/Colts situation...is nothing but the dumbest sports post I've seen in weeks on here - and that is saying something.

Matt Cassell -was unknown, but given the fact that he's now a starter on another NFL team, and in fact played in the pro-bowl last year - the guy can play.

The QB's the Colts brought in when Manning went out? A retired Kerry Collins - who lasted, what, 2 games? Curtis Painter? Dan Orlovsky?

All this tells you is that the Colts had really shitty backup QB's, the Patriots had a future NFL starter as a backup - period.

Brady is every bit as good and as important to his team as Manning is.

Sorry, but Cassel is not good. He's a better passer than Tebow, but he's a lot closer to that than he is to Brady.

I don't quite agree. Manning is more important and I think a better QB all else being equal, but Brady has had better coaches and generally, team around him. I'd still put Brady just behind Peyton though.
 
Huh? did you watch the game?, he did EXACTLY what a QB is supposed to, drove them for the go-ahead score with 2:30 left on the clock, at that point the defense should make a stop, first Asante Samuel let an INT go through his hands then the incredible "helmet catch" play. Given how well the Giant's defense was pressuring/ sacking Brady there was no way he or any QB was gonna hang 30 points on them. I don't mean to be rude but you should educate yourself more on how a game develops rather than blurt out "Brady blew the SB"

You've gotta understand the truth: many people truly believe that all Wins and Losses fall squarely on the shoulders of the QB. It doesn't matter if they only play on offense.
 
Sorry, but Cassel is not good. He's a better passer than Tebow, but he's a lot closer to that than he is to Brady.

I don't quite agree. Manning is more important and I think a better QB all else being equal, but Brady has had better coaches and generally, team around him. I'd still put Brady just behind Peyton though.

I put Manning and Brady on pretty much the same level. Both are amazing.
 
OP,
You ain't one of 'dem homoos! R ya?...

Pretty boy does git r' dun doh!
No homo, secured in my sexuality, but can recognize a good looking human being - that's what being secured is all about. If you don't understand that, you may want to step out of the closet.
 
Be that as it may, but that's the best record that any team has put up, to date. Had the '72 Dolphins played a full 19 games season, I highly doubt they'd have a perfect record.

I think you need to study the NFL a little more. The '84 49ers and '85 Bears also finished the season 18-1 and unlike the Patriots, they can call themselves "champions" that season. Who gives a flying crap if the Pats were the first to finish 16-0; they didn't finish when it counted.
 
Last edited:
I don't care if you hate the guy, but let's face it - he wins! Don't hate him because he's pretty. Don't hate him because he beat the living crap out of your teams. He just wins.

Three super bowl rings - WIN.
Numerous Division championships - WIN.
Owner of numerous NFL records - WIN.

Here, his accomplishment is so staggering, that I can't list them in this thread, but you can read about it here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Brady

On top of that, he's married to one of the most beautiful woman on the planet, has nice looking kids. If that's not winning, I don't know what is. WIN!

And, as it turns out, he's currently setting playoffs record, as I type. WIN!

I'm surprised the most prolific quarterback of our generation doesn't have his own thread. So, here it is.

Can you give this loser a colonoscopy while you are up there.
 
Back
Top