That's an expediency argument. Theoretically if such a thing exsists, it'll be discovered sooner or later. This would just lead to sooner. And it assumes that the person saved is in a position to recieve very high level education in biology. Really, bio isn't like mathamatics; there are no savants there that can work out advanced theory from introductory textbooks. With Africa the way it is, they'd have to be one of those miracle success stories.Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Well, with that arguement, how do you know that someone you save won't be some super genius who invents the cure for HIV or AIDS or finds a cure-all for cancer? The idea of just throwing them away is sickening, but the idea of avoiding our own to try scratching the surface with someone else is all the more sickening.Originally posted by: fredtam
The people of Africa have largely failed to evolve and are on the way to extinction. Sould we step in and save this "endangered species"? I don't know if it is in the best interest of modern man. Sure we can help them, feed them, industrialize them, but what will that accomplish? Nothing but the soaking up of the resources of the "fittest". The money would be much better spent here or at leat on cool endangered things like whales or rainforest.
In the end, I'd take the safe bet (Western, government/private funded research) over the impossible long-shot (your idea).
