We wouldn't. To do so would be ludicrous. But anti-patriots like Zakath15 and others would love to see the US be doomed to failure and take on criticism for doing so. Of course, we are not going to drop biological weapons on the Iraqi people
I'm sorry, back on track here folks... defecting inner-circle bodyguards... secret arsenals... the smoking gun...
<tries to steer the screeching thread back onto the pavement>
<tries to steer the screeching thread back onto the pavement>
0roo0roo
No Lifer
- Sep 21, 2002
- 64,795
- 84
- 91
interview with Dr. Khidhir Hamza
link to book on amazon
withreviews and written way before 9/11 he was educated in the states of course.
Yea! Who are we even to say who is good or bad! Just because Saddam has a different way of expressing himself...
ROTFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Originally posted by: StattlichPassat
And the rest of 'them'? Like stated further up (or in another thread)... they're readying their "So why haven't we gone to war yet???" signs.
Yea, any minute now they are going to be saying, "Darn it, Bush isn't doing his job, he is pandering to the UN and wasting time, why haven't we attacked yet!"
LOL!
Hopper
Originally posted by: Grasshopper27
ROTFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Originally posted by: StattlichPassat
And the rest of 'them'? Like stated further up (or in another thread)... they're readying their "So why haven't we gone to war yet???" signs.
Yea, any minute now they are going to be saying, "Darn it, Bush isn't doing his job, he is pandering to the UN and wasting time, why haven't we attacked yet!"
LOL!
Hopper
No, sadly any amount of proof is not going to please some people.
Originally posted by: flyfish
Yea! Who are we even to say who is good or bad! Just because Saddam has a different way of expressing himself...
you obviously missed the sarcasm
Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
Originally posted by: flyfish
Yea! Who are we even to say who is good or bad! Just because Saddam has a different way of expressing himself...
you obviously missed the sarcasm
No, I was just adding to it!
This is unfortunately true. The entire city of Berkeley, CA is going to be in denial. They will then go live in their own little world where they ignore world events.
Or perhaps you will be in denial when this article is discredited and Bush's incriminating evidence turns out to be a convoy of trucks driving down a highway that are certain to contain nukes because of top secret intelligence
I don't know who you think you're fooling, the majority of those advocating restraint in the war on Iraq do so because of the lack of solid evidence, and would be happy to see such evidence and subsequently attack once it is presented. We have no cause for embarrasment if it turns out everything Saddam is accused of is true. Only people like you who somehow manage to get the issue mixed up in patriotism and similar BS stand to lose if nothing turns up.
Originally posted by: aswedc
Or perhaps you will be in denial when this article is discredited and Bush's incriminating evidence turns out to be a convoy of trucks driving down a highway that are certain to contain nukes because of top secret intelligence
I don't know who you think you're fooling, the majority of those advocating restraint in the war on Iraq do so because of the lack of solid evidence, and would be happy to see such evidence and subsequently attack once it is presented. We have no cause for embarrasment if it turns out everything Saddam is accused of is true. Only people like you who somehow manage to get the issue mixed up in patriotism and similar BS stand to lose if nothing turns up.
Well keep watching and we'll see. There already IS solid evidence. People like you choose not to accept it. You won't agree until D.C. gets nuked.
I could say something really funny with your nick, but I won't. That reminds me, I have weeds to pull.
ThePresence
Elite Member
- Nov 19, 2001
- 27,727
- 16
- 81
Originally posted by: aswedc
Or perhaps you will be in denial when this article is discredited and Bush's incriminating evidence turns out to be a convoy of trucks driving down a highway that are certain to contain nukes because of top secret intelligence
I don't know who you think you're fooling, the majority of those advocating restraint in the war on Iraq do so because of the lack of solid evidence, and would be happy to see such evidence and subsequently attack once it is presented. We have no cause for embarrasment if it turns out everything Saddam is accused of is true. Only people like you who somehow manage to get the issue mixed up in patriotism and similar BS stand to lose if nothing turns up.
Evidence? What kind of evidence do you need? All you need to know is that Iraq did not comply with the UN treaties that were put in place at the end of the Gulf War as a requirement for ending the war. They kicked out inspectors etc. Why? So they can create baby formula? Truth is, the reason is not important, what is important is the fact that they do not comply with the UN and the latest UN reports just confirms that.
Bingo. Breaking the rules and refusing to comply and account for WMD is reason enough. But not for liberals.
Originally posted by: StattlichPassat
Originally posted by: SlowSS
Saddam's troops are going to be pretty busy relocating all those evidences.
Underground bunkers below sand dunes? Underground passages? No way. He's hosed.
I'd be very surprised if they let any inspectors in any of those facilities. If they did then I doubt they would actually see 'everything'.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 20K
-
-
-
Facebook
Twitter